I believe there shouldn’t be a ban on hiring smokers because if you really think about it majority of today’s society does smoke. There will be many places that would be underemployed because there won’t be enough people out there to hire because they smoke. If they want to smoke there needs to be a designated place for them to smoke and they either A need to bring a change of clothes to smoke in or B just don’t smoke while working. The change of clothes could be used because the smell of the smoke stays in the clothes and say they are taking care of a patient who has asthma, well the smoke smell on the clothes wouldn’t be good for the patients and there is nothing that covers up the smell of smoke once on your clothes or in your hair. So therefore I think there should not be a ban on hiring smokers.…
America is recognized for its laws regarding freedom. By allowing smoking in public places, we are taking away the freedom of health from nonsmokers. Through banning areas where smoking is permitted, we limit freedoms of the smoker, but do not eliminate the freedom entirely. The ban would be seen more as a restriction on where these freedoms can be exercised to ensure well being for all people, smokers and nonsmokers. These limitations are for the good of the American people as a whole, which makes the ban an appropriate course of action.…
What about the non-smoker who always has to respectfully get up and move tables every times someone lights up, or the couple that covers their nose while walking down the street to avoid the smoke traveling in front of them, And let’s not forget the children who are easily sickened and is forced to play in the sand while someone’s father is having a quick smoke on the bench at the park. Smoking should definitely be banned on the non smoker behalf. It is worse for those that work in a bar, café or a restaurant. They have no way of escaping that dirty stale cigarette smell, and it’s not…
Smoking cigarettes can cause lung problems. Both first-hand and second-hand smokers are affected by cigarette smoke. Scientific findings and researches show that the chemicals in cigarettes, apart from the smoke, can lead to health problems such as lung cancer. Smoking cigarettes should be banned in public places. In public places, more people, both young and old, can be exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. My position differs from those who might say that smoking altogether should not be banned. My position is that smoking in public places should be banned. It does not include smoking in private places like homes. Smoking in public places should be banned because it poses health risks to individuals who are non-smokers and who do not want to inhale the fumes from cigarettes. The risks are double to those who already have lung ailments.…
| The United Kingdom is considering the appeal and revocation of a partial public smoking ban that exempts non-food serving bars (pubs). According to a public poll performed, 72% of the U.K. people preferred a full-scale public smoking ban. The U.K. Parliament will vote on changing the partial ban to a full ban with no exemptions (“New hope for a complete smoking ban in public places,” 2006).New hope for a complete smoking ban in public places. (2006). Lancet, 367(9506), 184. Retrieved July 24, 2008, from EBSCOhost database.…
Many smokers argue that a smoking ban infringes on their rights to enjoy a cigarette. But really, it’s the non-smoker whose rights are violated when they are forced to gamble or work in a cloud of secondhand smoke. “Research from Stanford and Tufts universities shows secondhand smoke is a danger to millions of casino patrons and thousands of workers” (Myers). People have a right to enjoy a casino without being in danger. Baskies sums it up well:…
Some states already started banning cigarette smoking to protect the health of the masses. In fact, more states and local cities started giving ordinances and prohibitions on smoking in public area. One of the leading causes of preventable death in United States is the tobacco products, it kills nearly thousands of Americans each year. They were saying that smoking is such a harmful activity and should be removed and banned, and then there are many other activities that should be banned due to the fact…
Smoking is one of the number 1 killers in the world. It not only kills the people smoking, it also kills the people who around it. Tobacco contains nicotine which is highly addictive. So people addicted to it even they know smoking gives you cancer, heart desease, asthma and other health problems. Therefore we are totally think that tobacco products should be banned because it is harmful, waste of money, and affects to the environment. Smoking can shorten your life by 10 years.…
Banning smoking from the workplace means a cleaner and more approachable environment for all to enter. It also means that less breaks will be required during shifts for employees, because they won't be needed extra breaks for smokes in between their work. Banning smoking for employees in the workplace is also more hygienic because it doesn't leave a 'smokers' smell on the employees uniform therefore leaving a smell wherever they pass.…
I fully support a ban on smoking in all public places. The best way to reduce the number of smokers is to help prevent people from starting in the first place. A partial ban for smoking will not work.…
Smoking has been revealed as a cause of many medical complications such as cancer to smokers, and non-smokers who inhale the tobacco smoke. Considering its adverse effects on public health, banning smoking in public is the most suitable course of action for governments, and other organizations offering public services. Smoking cause damages to the health of non-smokers against their will as they are forced to breathe in smoke exhaled by the smokers. Various countries in the world have laws prohibiting smoking in public places due to its effect on second hand smokers and especially children. Although various arguments have been raised in support and in opposition of public smoking, banning remains the most suitable course of action.…
Smoking is still a major part of the public’s life, but in a much different way due to the smoking ban laws in restaurants and bars. I do believe the laws are a very significant because not only does smoking effect the culprit it affects the people around them who are by choice non-smokers, and these laws will help to improve the health and appearance of society.…
There are many arguments for and against a smoking ban, however the fact remains that the legislation has been implemented. Hospitality has always been a dynamic industry, fast paced and ever changing. The most successful businesses have always been the most adaptable to change, whether the changes are economic, demographic or on this case legal.…
Smoking ban in almost all work places and public areas has made hotly debated issue of late. While many people approve of this legislation, some take issue with it for fear of their freedom being restricted. Nevertheless, from my personal standpoint, I am convinced that banning smoking has its pros and cons for the reasons illustrated below.…
Forcing restaurants and pubs to ban smoking in their establishments is an infringement of the owners’ rights. Despite the numerous hazards of smoking, smoking itself is not an illegal act. Restaurants,…