Preview

Oppression Of The Ideas Of Rousseau, And Marx

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
836 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oppression Of The Ideas Of Rousseau, And Marx
Throughout the centuries philosophers have been contemplating similar situations coming to a different end result. 18th century enlightenment thinkers influenced the way 20th century thinkers perceived humans which influenced later generations. Rousseau, Marx, and Nietzsche all believed that humans are trapped by society which forces them to be less than they can be. Rousseau and Marx wanted to create forms of government in order to limit the amount of inequality that was presented within the society, but Nietzsche argues this only creates more suppression for the people. The only way for humans will be able to reach their full potential is by eliminating government and governing themselves.
Human beings are trapped not by nature but by society.
…show more content…
Human society is bound up with the institution of private property. Private property creates alienated labor. This, in turn, means that human society alienates humans from their true humanity and does not allow them to reach their full potential. Unlike Rousseau who creates man in his natural state, Marx focuses on the scientific study of political economy to find the root of alienation. "and finally, the division of labour offers us the first example of how, as long as man remains in natural society, that is, as long as a cleavage exists between the particular and the common interest, as long, therefore, as activity is not voluntarily, but naturally, divided, man’s own deed becomes an alien power opposed to him, which enslaves him instead of being controlled by him” (Marx). Alienated labor cuts humans off from the product and work itself, from the activity of work, from other humans, and turns human value to that of mere private existence. Marx believes that communism will abolish alienated labor and restore true …show more content…
He says, “the strong are as naturally inclined to strive to be apart as the weak are to strive to be together, when the former unite, this takes place only with a view to an aggressive collective action and collective satisfaction of their will to power” (101). This shows that he may believe with the overall concept of being trapped, but that Rousseau and Marx only trap us further into those conventions. Rousseau believes in a social contract bound by an agreement between the rulers and ruled, in which Nietzsche says that the weak are those who strive to be together. The establishment of law is a way for the weak to hold down the strong, in which both are kept from being the best they can be. Marx also believes in a government, a communist one. Meanwhile, Nietzsche believes the ideal person would be a sovereign individual. Nietzsche did not trust government and did not believe in government the way Marx and Rousseau did, creation of government is what keeps people being less than they can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We need to come together and demonstrate Rousseau’s, Social Contract. Rousseau believes we need to stop making decisions based on our own needs and think about…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1) Estrangement of the worker from his product; Workers suffer from being ‘alienated’, and impoverishment due to the political economy of private ownership, society is divided into classes. “Political economy does not disclose the source of the division between labour and capital, and between capital and land” (p. 32).…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Walmart

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx, K. (2010). “Estranged Labor.” Pp. 32-38 in Social Theory: The Multicultural Readings (2010) edited…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adam Smith and Karl Marx are both considered few of the most influential giants in social and economical history. When viewing their economical standpoints, it is not difficult to recognize the difference in ideas that they have regarding society. Adam Smith is an advocator for capitalism and the wealth that can be accumulated in it, while Karl Marx critiques on the flaws of capitalism and praises communism that will overthrow the capitalist society. However, both of them base their theories on the characteristic of labor. Even though Marx and Smith both point to the significance of one's labor in a capitalist society, Smith views labor as having the potential, in conjunction with the division of labor, to stimulate the public wealth and encourage the growth of an ultimately unregulated opulent commercial society. Marx, while starting at a conceptually similar point, observes that in a capitalist system people cannot acquire the wealth produced by their labor due to the alienation between the laborer and his/her means of production. The result of this alienation is exponential division of wealth between the rich bourgeois and the deprived proletariat, leading to revolution in the capitalist economy.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The fundamental problem facing mankind, according to Rousseau, is that "Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains."(Social Contract, 181) His "freedom" can only be attained when each man is independent and is not ruled by the private interests of any individual or group. Until this is accomplished, each person is still a slave to others and his freedom is forfeited. Man united form a civil society, but Rousseau is dissatisfied with the one they form. He feels the people are still oppressed and are only equal in…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man never progresses because he lacks the ability to solve problems. By taking step aback, Rousseau is not assuming that humans were once solitary, whereas in Hobbes’ version, people did have social interaction, but only government was absent. However, in absence of reason, humans do have emotions like pity, which helps them live in harmony. With everything well balanced, savages are happy within themselves, making inequality hardly noticeable. Even though he thinks that the state of nature never existed and never will, Rousseau’s preference for the savage human over civilized human is fascinating because this implies that Rousseau does not want the humans to develop. However, when we look at the modern society, humans are oppressed at every moment in contrast to the state of nature. Today, as Lincoln said, democracy is defined as for the people, by the people and of the people. Is the power really in people’s hands? Or are they politically enslaved by the leaders they voted to represent them? As Rousseau says, laws are just made by the rich, here political leaders, to secure their power and position, keeping the weak, the citizens, in the illusion of…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx's Theory of Alienation

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Alienation, a concept that became widely known during the 19th and 20th century has been looked at extensively by a number of leading theorists. Theorists such as Georg Hegel first used the idea of alienation as a philosophic idea, but his work was later grasped upon by theorists known as Ludwig Feuerbach and more importantly Karl Marx. The world till now has been witness to a change in different social structures and forms in which society operates. We as human beings must ask, what purpose do we serve within society? What means do we have to sustain an effective or prosperous way of living? Marx believed we have been through different economic stages and ownership of the things we need to live, beginning with the times of the ancient to feudalism (land granted from the crown) to now where we have arrived at capitalism (private ownership). He saw this as historical stages of development where each stage has the characteristics of a system of production and division of labour, forms of property ownership and a system of class relations (Morrison,K.1995:40). This brought forward Marx’s idea of historical materialism which centred on how to interpret the history of mankind and the development of one stage of society to the next. In turn it looks for reasons for changes in human society and how humans together produced the necessary requirements to live. In relation to historical materialism there was another idea of dialectal materialism. This was a term used by Marx to study natural phenomena, the evolution of society and human thought itself as a process of development which rests upon motion and contradiction (Clapp,R: Acc 10/11/2012). Marx further explains historical and dialectical materialism which will be looked at further in the essay. By understanding how humans produce the necessities to live (historical materialism) and how a way of reasoning helps us to see the growth…

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    He wrote “From the cultivation of land, there is necessarily followed the division of land; and from property once recognized, the first rules of justice” (Rousseau 52) and that inequality “derives its force and growth from the development of our faculties and the progress of the human mind, and eventually becomes stable and legitimate through the establishment of property and laws” (Rousseau 70). Rousseau believed that it is the establishment of a civil society that produced moral inequality, where there are differences in wealth, power, status or class. While the creation and the implementation of law is meant to secure the rights of the people and protect them from political domination, it can be exploited entirely and resulted in the subjugation of the people who are not in power. This is apparent in the current judicial system of the United States, where African Americans and Latinos are unjustly targeted and incarcerated just for belonging to certain demographics that is stereotyped as violent, criminal and…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 is a compilation of thoughts regarding German economic and political concerns. Karl Marx conceives capitalist society’s responsible for the estrangement of the laborer. The capitalist mode of production ensures that man’s labor necessarily restricts him from acting in accordance with his humanity. The theory of capitalism diverts him, in the sense that it provides false hope for betterment, while the structure of capitalism, in coercing him to fluctuate his priorities away from that of an autonomous social being towards that of a collective individual, debases man’s special bond to his species- what is self-contradictory is it asks him to abandon his deepest bond to humanity, while at the same time offering him the hope of becoming a better social being. As a result of this contradiction, Marx affirm, man’s labor alienates him from himself and from his species. Yet I am here to argue, although man may feel alienated from himself and product of work, man has the choice, option to free himself from notions of capital enslavement. Within this essay, I will define estrangement of labor and the four main dimensions of alienation, evident in a capitalist society. I will discuss how alienated labor comes about as a result of capitalism and why said labor is not socially commend. Furthermore, I will elucidate on what non-alienated labor would be like, compared to alienated labor, in a capitalist society. Ultimately, I will annotate why Marx’s critique of capitalism is unfound and how labor under capitalism is in fact, engaging.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Race Class Gender

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. the alienated labor is when” private property and its owners hires and controls others and defines labor for them” Instead of results of one’s labor benefiting one’s self, the labor becomes a function that benefits the property owners (184). Therefore, capitalist get to hold on to their money by the “means of production”(184). In a capitalist society Owners vs. non-owners, conflict the rises between the “haves” and the “have not’s” are inevitable. Class structure is maintained by 3 mechanisms; State (ruling class asserting their common interest 185), Ideology (Ideas that support and legitimizes the position of capitalist 185) and the capitalist structure itself due to custom an training views the condition of capitalism a normal process and creates a dependency of workers on the system which makes it hard to resist or rebel. For Ma0rx the important issues structure of economic relations that drives everything else(185, 186. His ideology correlates with contemporary society because of the overabundance of productions which then leads to bankruptcy (2009 housing crisis)(188).…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rousseau believed that in order for a society to be justified it must 'best affirm the individual freedom of all citizens'. In Rousseau's theory of a state of nature, he claims that human beings were once able to live 'uncorrupted by society' and could essentially do as they wished. Within all states of nature, when conflicts being to arise each society needs some form of structured government to offer protection and security. For this theory to be successful, each individual must relinquish a portion of their freedom for choice in order to gain protection and maintain physical freedom within their society. Rousseau believed in a 'collective will' theory where the people are represented by a 'sovereign' who expresses the general will that aims for the common good. The sovereign is not one singular person although they defend the rights and desires of individuals. However, Plato believed that the theory of giving the people the choice over the actions of their society cannot be successful as it is assumes that they have the ability to determine what is the best decision. By assuming this one is not considering that when making a decision, people are often…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau as Totalitarian?

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    But the methods suggested for discovering the general will were basically democratic. This concept was introduced to prevent exploitation and this will only take effect if it is willed by the citizens. In this case, we can see that Rousseau was proposing that the best way for a community to make decisions was really to use democratic procedures. Hence, we cannot condemn him being a totalitarian advocate just because general will reigns. After all, even if it controls every citizen, it still comes from all and it tends always to the preservation and welfare of the whole and every associate.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau is a firm believer that humans are born good, and society corrupts them. Throughout his Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, he attempts to give many reasons and examples on how this is so. One of my favorite arguments of his was from p. 34, “I ask if anyone has ever heard tell of a savage who was living in liberty ever dreaming of complaining about his life and of killing himself.” Although this argument is very blunt, he does make a good point. Being a part of society and dealing with its influences can be very stressful; it can also lower self-esteem. However, I still cannot seem to lean to his side on this argument.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Few philosophers viscerally strike a chord with their readers, regardless of the subject in question. Yet there is something within Marx's essay, Alienated Labor, that is able to communicate directly to working people laboring even over one-hundred and fifty years subsequent to its publication. There is good reason for this: Marx elucidated a theory of labor in which workers become subservient to the objects they produce, a theory where people are not exalted by their labor, but devalued by it. Marx's concept of alienated labor describes the internal conflict and disparity of workers, be they from the 19th or 21st century, when their existence is contingent upon fulfilling the desires and wants of another and neglecting their own.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays