"Expectancy theory directs us to determine employees ' current views or perceptions about the odds of achieving certain goals and relative preferences for different rewards or "outcomes" in their work.…
As Judge describes in Organizational Behavior, the Expectancy Theory, initially developed by Victor Vroom, proposes that an employee can be motivated to maximum levels of performance when a manager can match the organizational rewards to the personal goals. The personal goals are those that they are attractive to individual employees. In order to achieve this, Vroom examines the three key components and relationships that take place between the following aspects of the employer-employee relationship: individual effort, individual performance, organizational rewards, and personal goals.…
In my past I have experienced working for a management that used achievement motivation as a tool for motivation personnel. This attempt at motivation the workers worked to some degree. Supervisors would select employees whom they felt performed admirably over a 4 month period and would select 5 of them to receive 250 dollars or 3 days off with pay, an excellent performance reward, and public recognition. This type of reward inspired to motivate many employees but everyone is not inspired by this method of motivation. Although it reached the majority of the employees, some were still not motivated and eventually failed because they were not motivated to perform better. I think that will or drive theories would have increased…
The expectancy theory was developed by Victor H. Vroom in 1964 as a systematic explanation of individual motivation within the workplace. This theory put forth three key components: expectancy, performance, and valence. From the base component of the theory, which is expectancy, behavior is built by an individual’s value of the reward or valence. Vroom’s theory of expectancy is used by manager to understand how individual employees are motivated and how they will respond to rewards closely tied to the tasks given. Expectancy is proposed to be an individual’s understanding of how their effort leads to a given performance level. Vroom put forth in his theory that individuals believe the more effort put into a task or objective, the better the performance on the task. Therefore, effort leads to performance or E P. This effort is closely related to the individual’s belief that they can perform the given task (self-efficacy), whether they believe the task is perceived obtainable, and the individual can control the goal or performance. If the result of a strong effort is a good or exceptional performance, than the result of good performance should be a given outcome, P O. This outcome should be a reward tied closely to the task and performance. A reward that is tied significant to the performance will help to motivate the individual’s effort. The third key factor of Vroom’s expectancy theory is valence. Valence refers to how much value the individual places on the reward, V(R). Again, the reward should be tied to the outcome, but without a perceived value by the individuals, performance will not put forth any effort to begin with. A summary of the Vroom’s expectancy is seen with the following notation. (Web site, Expectancy Theory, 2013)…
Some theories of motivation use individual needs to explain the behaviors and attitudes of people at work and all the theories agree that needs cause tensions that influence attitudes and behavior. Good managers and leaders establish conditions in which people can satisfy important needs through their work. They also take action to eliminate things that can block the satisfaction of important needs. (Chapter 10, Section 10.1) As a manager expectancy theory is one motivation you want to keep within your teams. People believe that working hard will result in a level of task performance being completed. A person also believes that successful performance will be followed by some sort of reward or other means of an incentive. People place value on their work also just because of the possible rewards and other work-related outcomes. Being an observant manager an applying this theory when necessary will keep employees fulfilled and wanting to do their jobs to the full…
If people know that their employment may be in jeopardy or that the company is looking to downsize, they will likely be motivated to perform their jobs in a highly effective manner. Ultimately, external factors in this author’s opinion can be more effective than internal factors. Not all human beings have the same work ethic; thus knowing that their job is on the line, most human beings will naturally be inclined to increase their work…
First of all, the individual assesses his skills and abilities to determine if in fact he can deliver the performance required to accomplish the assigned task and he also assesses the likelihood that his effort will be recognized. He then assesses the likelihood that his performance will lead to an actual reward. He then determines how much said reward means to him. This can provide guidelines for a leader who’s seeking to enhance employee motivation by altering the individual’s effort-to-performance expectancy, performance-to-reward expectancy, and reward valences.…
Organizational culture consists of the values and assumptions shared within an organization. It defines what is important and unimportant in the company and, consequently, directs everyone in the organization toward the “right way” of doing things.…
2. “Expectancy theory rests on four basic assumptions. First, it assumes that behavior is determined by a combination of forces in the individual and in the environment. Second, it assumes that people make decisions about their own behavior in organizations. Third, it assumes that different people have different types of needs, desires, and goals. Fourth, it assumes that people make choices from among alternative plans of behavior, based on their perceptions of the extent to which a given behavior will lead to desired outcomes.” (Textbook page 455). To increase an employee’s motivation they could do some sort of a reward plan. For example Starbucks employees earn stock as a function of their seniority and performance. By doing this, their hard work helps them earn shares of ownership in the company.…
According to Montana and Charnov (2000), expectancy theory shows that rewards could motivate employees to increase their efforts…
If an employer recognizes their employees and worked to show them how important their jobs are, then they would be more motivated to improve their…
The best way to ensure employees’ commitment and quality of work is to identify and properly address the intrinsic factors that motivate them and bring out their best. Where employees are given “opportunities for self-actualization they are likely to remain with the organization and the company image is consequently improved and enhanced.” Seeing that everyone has individual personality, there are many different ways one can be motivated. Some are self-determined individuals with inner drive and passion to be the best at what they do just because they would like to be the greatest. Applying new motivation theories not currently in practice provides an avenue for leaders to “examine alternate avenues of approach before making decision that affects the individual and organizational…
Lunenburg, F. (2011). Expectancy Theory of Motivation: Motivating by Altering Expectations. International Journal Of Management, Business And Administrations Volume, 15.…
Psychologically, management should state clearly their expectations. Their role should be to support, promote flexibility, provide advancement opportunities, and offer praise when it’s due. Employees are more likely to put forth great effort with the knowledge that those efforts will be noticed and reviewed. The energy that management puts into their employees is paramount to creating growth both in the individual and the company. (Robbins, et al, 2011)…
Second, the work and jobs in current business world can hardly be defined into predefined steps. We are facing a dynamic ever-changing world, the way we doing things yesterday might not relevant today--It helps but not hundred percent correct in most of the cases. If everyone still passively follow the yesterday defined steps into today’s work, it might be wrong. The If- then not always happens without exceptions. Also, there are many new issues, problem we are facing day by day. It is hardly to be all predefined. How to motivate employees to do right things can be challenge if the motivation is built upon extrinsic motivators. What often happens is people either still mindfully follow the old way to do things or just don’t do what is outside of the steps needed, even it should not be bypassed. The extrinsic motivator limited the thinking!…