Parallel Perspectives: Evolutionary Epistemology

Parallel Perspectives
There are various practices that study the way different notions between nature, human, and technology are connected. In fact, Evolutionary epistemology emphasizes its study in cognitive mechanism in both humans and animals, as wells as evolutionary biology based on the role of natural selection. Two philosophers and epistemologist, Heidegger and Foucault, present their perspective of this practice in different ways: Heidegger based his studies on a term known as “dasein” or to be part of the world, also technology and language. Under his perspective, things in the modern world are considered objects and resources. On the other hand, Foucault studied the relationship between power, knowledge, and language, and focuses on how selves become subjects. In addition, he argues that in order to differ away from the traditional history and common worldviews, there is “coexistence of multiplicities”. Based on the studies of both philosophers, a parallel can be drawn to determine how information was recorded and the structured based on being and language.
One of the most important elements of Heidegger ideology is based on the figure of god in humans. It is based on the Socratic principles of how knowledge was given to humans by god, without recognizing or feeling that a god itself is making them
Structuralism is the thoughtful and focused application of technology in order to reveal the world’s cultural structures. Foucault used the term “Scientificity” to define the act to represent facts without any relevant structure or discourse, thus he did not consider it an analysis. In fact, in his book he uses his archaeological method to validate how scientific knowledge is dependent on the structure of a culture in a precise moment in history. In the three main time periods of history, the Classical, the Renaissance, and the modern era, he defines language as a