Preview

Patricians And Plebeians Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
550 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Patricians And Plebeians Essay
The patricians and the plebeians
Introduction Ancient Roman lived under Roman Rule. Citizens were divided between the patricians who are noble and the plebeians who are the poor, the lower class. The patricians held most of the power and most of the wealth, so the plebeians felt inequality and started to fight to get more and more power. So, they created the Republic period of Rome.
Political inequality There are several developed political institutions during the Roman Republic period. The consuls, the executive power, were there. It was considered a very high title. There were two of them at any given time. They could veto each other to keep away any one consul from getting too powerful. And there was a Senate, which is elected to be the oldest and wisest of the citizens. In the early days, the consuls and senators were elected from the patricians who were mostly wealthy landowning families from
…show more content…
The plebeians withdrew from the city until they were given the right to elect their own leaders. This was the beginning of the struggle of the orders. Also, there were big differences between the patricians, and the plebeians caused many conflicts. Only the patricians could participate the government. However, intermarriage law permitted to participate the plebeians to the government. From this, the plebeians started to gain more and more power.
Conclusion The plebeians knew what they were treated and what they wanted. The patricians were wealthy and political power. The plebeians in Ancient Rome was not deserved in equally than the patricians economically and politically. The plebeians wanted to live next door to the patricians. They wanted to pass the written law to walk down the same street in the same society. So, they raised their voice. They make their own assembly and tribunes to reflect their interest. At last, the plebeians could be the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Consequences in the Roman Empire were also shown between the patricians and the plebeians. During the fifth century B.C.E, relations between the classes became so strained that the plebeians threatened to succeed from Rome and establish a rival settlement. This eventually led to the establishment of tribunes which altered the Roman government.…

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    APWH Rome and China Notes

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages

    c This caused the Patricians to benefit greatly, but the plebeians did not. This caused a larger gap between the rich and poor.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Conflict of Orders- Patricians vs. Plebeians became a fight between the rich wealthy class and the majority peasant class |…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were supposed to pay taxes and fight in battles. Which I think is wrong because nobody should be forced into battle. Plebs were also not allowed to vote in decision over wars and peace. They called the patrician the privileged class in Rome. They were the rich and had everything the plebs didn't. Plebes struggle with equal rights but soon got them.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early Roman Empires DBQ

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Forum was the central gathering for the Romans. The Forum was considered to be their capital, and with a centralized place, comes centralized government and laws (8). The Romans also held the importance of Senators, and ruling office very close. The senators were the ones who were able to keep the native-born citizens living a hectic free lifestyle (5). Religious views and inputs were also held very high in Rome. The Romans placed material goods higher up in their life (6). Rome also classified their citizens into three different social categories. First were the Egyptians and natives who were very poor citizens, second was the mercenaries who were an undiscipled body, and the third was Alexandrians who unlike their mercenaries, followed the Hellenistic customs, and were of Greek origin (10).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Romans began a republic which had a 2 consuls, a senate, assemblies, and officials. The consuls were similar to modern day presidents but stayed in office for only a year. The Senate led religious events and foreign policy. It also was in control of the revenue. Roman senate consisted of the wealthy men. The assemblies were created so the people other than the wealthy could have their say in the government. However the people in the assemblies had to be full citizen males, meaning no foreigners or slaves. Roman republic officials did have decent authority but there laws were made to ensure they did not get too much power, leaving more of it to the wealthy. Rome was also centralized, because of its location and saw many migrations and invasions, from Po River people and those in Sicily. At 44 B.C. Rome became an empire, led by an emperor, with senators, advisers, and of course the massive army. Over time, the Roman army became more and more powerful. When Romans would conquer and expand they would normally devastate that area. Eventually, Rome became a military monarchy. Rome then split its empire in two, having a emperor in the west, and another in the east.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romans According to the picture in document F, people in the senate usually come from the oldest Roman families and inherited their seats.Having an adverse experience and an omnipotent knowledge, objectives that allows a family to be considered old, and old people will more than likely teach there all knowing knowledge and splendid skill to their children. This stabilizes the senate to only contain smart and wise people. This helps encourage the senate's flow of great thoughts. This helps stabilizes the senate's sense of justice. While the Athenians let the the committee that oversaw the assembly, be decided by a lottery from a general citizenry, according to Document E. In lotteries, power might possibly fall into the hands of people that are careless or contain deep hatred about their state. Power in the hands of a fool could cause the bankruptcy an empire or citizen riots, or even worse. Power in the hands of a fool could cause the rioting of citizens. Power in the hands of a fool could cause the loss of an empire .Whether Athens gave power to the right people is a question for another day, whereas the Romans gave power to the appropriate…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To obtain political rights, the common people (Plebeians) formed their own assembly, the Concillum Plebus and named their leaders tribunes.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Romans had a basic law of sorts, called the laws of the Twelve Tables. This governed a lot of Roman daily life and proceedings, and was the basis of a sort of equal rights scheme for the plebeian class. In addition to this, the Lex Hortensia, passed in 287BC, further blurred the distinctions between plebeians and patricians. The twelve tables, and any laws passed by a plebeian assembly, would now be binding to both plebeians and patricians, a sort of social justice.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imperial Rome’s political control was mainly based on social status. For instance wealthy men dominated over women, and poor men. They had a written code of law that offered plebeians (poorer class) protection from abuse. This gave the plebeians an opportunity to shape public policy. Romans took great pride in this, and believed they enjoyed greater freedom than most of their neighbors. They had a rule of law, the rights of citizens, the absences of pretension, upright moral behavior, and keeping ones word. This was later recognized as “the way of the ancestors.”…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The success of the Romans started with their organization within the city. Almost all citizens could vote, and after plebeians were allowed to hold office, almost anybody could be appointed to the Senate and other governmental positions. Voting created a pride in the city, as every person held a stake in the city. It created a sprit that could be seen on the battlefield. Voting also allowed for merit…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This disparity in power was evident in the political structure. During the centuries of the Roman Empire, there were many changes in the governing. A monarchy became an oligarchy which became a military dictatorship which became emperor rule. However, throughout that whole history, the rich remained on top, and the poor remained lesser.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Flaws

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The early Roman Republic will always be remembered for its revolutionary government. Citizen-elected leaders who represented both the rich and the poor worked together for the well-being of the country as a whole. After the decline of the Empire began, however, politics in Rome became less and less respectable. The emperor, who was at one time chosen fairly and based on merit and potential as a leader, was now being given away on other terms. The Praetorian…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Rome, patricians were known to be the ruling class of the society, while plebians were the peasants or commoners without opportunities to move upward on the social ladder. The lack of social mobility in Ancient Rome poses a comparison against modern time United States. One of the very core foundations of the U.S. is that citizens are encouraged to pursue the American dream. People still hold true the promise of the better life by achieving education attainment…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays