Preview

Peace During The Cold War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peace During The Cold War
What is the reason behind the peace between the United States and the U.S.S.R. during the cold war? How were their relations and reasons for peace different from that of second-tier powers such as Japan? The United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics emerged as the two most powerful nations in the aftermath of World War II. After five years of fighting the Germans, the soviet nation was more powerful than ever, and Joseph Stalin wanted to continue their rise to power and become the world hegemon. The United States also experienced a rapid increase in power, both economically and military, due to the war. The United States’ military was the largest that it had ever been, and the conflict with Germany and Japan had forced the United …show more content…
For the nature of this essay, peace is defined as a period without a conflict involving fatalities of more than 1,000 military members. The United States and the U.S.S.R. knew that a war could be started by the push of the button, 2 pounds of force. There are many reasons for why a war was not started during the 43-year period, one of which is known at the Security Dilemma. Part of the Offense-Defense Model, the Security Dilemma is a Neorealist tradition whereas one state increases its security it subsequently decreases the security of others. In relation to the Cold War, Gaddis writes that after the fall of Germany, “there was less of an incentive for these former allies… to keep their anxieties under control. Each crisis that arose fed the next one, and with the result that a divided Europe became a reality.” The Security Dilemma is just one of the possible outcomes of the Offense-Defense …show more content…
during the Cold War. John Mearsheimer wrote of the four different power balances that can be in a system, balanced bipolarity, unbalanced bipolarity, balanced multipolarity, and unbalanced multipolarity. In a bipolar system, there are only two great powers, while a multipolar system contains more than two powers. After WWII, there were two great powers to emerge, the United States and the U.S.S.R. They created a bipolar system, once which theorist claimed, “would last for as far into the future as anyone could see.” According to many theorists, a bipolar system is the most stable balance type that a system can have. Kenneth Waltz cites four factors for why a bipolar system is the most stable. First, two world powers means there are no peripheral powers to get in the way. Second, “the range of factors included in competition is extended as the intensity of the competition increases.” The United States was now not only competing with the U.S.S.R. economically and militarily, but also socially, to the point where Nixon considered the Supreme Court’s desegregation decision as the greatest victory of the war. Third, with a bipolar system, there is a constant pressure and reoccurring crises, where eventually “the absence of crises becomes more disturbing than their recurrence.” People are more aware of what to expect, so

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Lewis Gaddis Summary

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this book writer, John Lewis Gaddis has talked about how Russia and eastern Europe are changing the way history specialists take a gander at the icy war. The primary contention that was made by the writer in this book was " How Soviet's perspective of one-sided security crashed into US's conviction that security is multilateral to create two ranges of prominence: one of compulsion and one of assent." The Partners Atlantic Contract, August 1941,Roosevelt, and Churchill announced 3 Wilsonian after war goals to guarantee global security through a multilateral approach: self-assurance, open market, and aggregate security. Stalin had firmly connected state security with his very own security and trusted security must be accomplished by denying every other person of it and picking up an area while the US thought of security as an aggregate decent inescapable clash.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The end of WWII left the United States and the Soviet Union as the two dominant world powers, and they soon became locked in a “cold war” confrontation. The Cold War spread from Europe to become a global ideological conflict between democracy and communism. Among its effects were a nasty hot war in Korea and a domestic crusade against “disloyalty.”…

    • 4151 Words
    • 119 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We could only solve our problems by cooperating with other countries … we needed to put an end to the Iron Curtain, to change the nature of international relations … and particularly to end the arms race.” (Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev). Gorbachev was the former president of the Soviet Union and a former war leader. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1990 for his abilities to end the Cold War between the United States and Russia. Gorbachev made peace with the United States during the war, which eventually caused it to come to an end. Even though Gorbachev was a former war leader, he was also a very charitable man who founded his own organization. He founded Green Cross International, an organization that converts military bases to civilian use; The organization also remedies the effects of nuclear contamination, especially on children (PBS). Gorbachev is a peacemaker due…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powder Keg Myth Essay

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Offense-defense balance: Argues that wars are more likely when the offense is perceived to have relative advantage on the battlefield. Central argument scholars make when discussing how perceived offense dominance can cause crises to escalate to war – useful explanation for why states with essentially defensive foreign policy aims can stumble into war…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peaceful coexistence developed as a policy designed to meet the short term needs of both the East and the West. It was a superficial policy that disguised the continuation of fundamental differences between the two superpowers during the ‘thaw’ of 1953-1956, and was therefore never fully supported by either side. During this time, the arms race escalated, ideological conflict continued and security remained a distinct priority. By 1956 peaceful coexistence was shown to have been nothing more than a facade as the differences between the two sides returned to the fore.…

    • 990 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    McDermott, Rose. Journal of Cold War Studies. Fall2002, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p29-59. 31p. DOI:…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Haab, T. F. (2009). Payments for sustainability: a case study on subsistence farming in Ecuador. Harvard International Review.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What views and actions chosen by the Soviet Union and United States contributed to the Cold War?…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cold War

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    the Cold War. While the Cold War affected United States foreign policy, it also had a…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Buzan, B. 1997. Rethinking Security after the Cold War. Cooperation and Conflict. Vol. 32, No. 1: 5-28.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cold war and communism

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Watching the duck and cover makes one think, would hiding under a desk or jacket against a wall really save someone. Seeing this makes one think if living during the time of a nuclear war would be desirable, not that one has the choice but it would have to be a thought. According to this duck and cover video, a nuclear bomb warning can happen at any time and one would find somewhere that was considered safe and a good distance from windows to duck and cover. If one saw a bright flash then they were to duck underneath any clothing available and against any type of structure as soon as they possibly could to protect themselves. This era had to be extremely stressful, especially for the young children this video was being shown too. This video had to wreak havoc on a child’s subconscious.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cold war and communism

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For me living under the threat of nuclear war would have been horrendous for me and my family. Living in fear everyday knowing that at any moment a country could drop a nuclear bomb on me and my family and annihilate us is a very scary thought. To live under threat of a nuclear war is to have the realization that your destiny and your family destiny is in the hands of a country that your country may be at odds with. It is the realization that you may not have control over what is going to happen tomorrow.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cold War and Communism

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are situations in life that can arise at any moment, without our control. Nuclear war and terrorism are two of these situations. There are things we can do to prepare for these situations, but are we ever really prepared?…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays