Pennsylvania was founded by William Penn and was founded as a “holy experiment.” William Penn and wanted equality to all, even woman, indians and even blacks. This religious practice was adopted by the quackers. Quakers were the first to believe in abolitionist. Quakers had very good relations with the indians since they believed in equality.…
Penn – advertised colony as place of religious toleration – heavily promoted it to immigrants…
The colonies of Massachusetts and Virginia were located in separate regions of the New World and had many social and economic variations. The very laws and ideas these people have put into work are what have shaped America into the county it is today. When looking at these two colonies we know one thing is for sure, trade, land, religion, and natural resources were vital parts of their being. In this free-response essay I will contrast the colonies by how their societies were ran and how their economies affected their way of life.…
Arriving to North America, the Indians grew worried of the growing population of European settlers and colonists coming in and taking their lands. Though both Penn and Winthrop sought to gain lands for colonization, Penn had a more peaceful approach to the Indians. Penn would create good relations with the natives and the Quakers would negotiate over the lands in a just manner. Penn encouraged the Indian culture to come into the Quaker communities while Winthrop wanted to exclude the Indians out the Puritan communities. The Puritans in turn would just take lands from the Indians and force the Indians to fall back into the backcountry. Winthrop believed that the Indians “inclose no land, neither they have any settled habitation, nor any tame Cattle to improve the land by...we may lawfully take the [land].”…
As the settlement of the New World continued, more and more young men filtered in. The agonizing tradition of fortune being left to the oldest son was not satisfactory for many second sons, and so the prospect for fortune, land, and recognition commenced in America. While many did not have land in the Mother Country, it was easy to come by in the New World. Opportunities for wealth were bountiful and run rampant as cash crops swept the settlers. Tobacco, the “brown gold” was cheap and in-demand in England. This crop was literally turned into instant…
By the 1700s, New England and the Chesapeake region had developed very distinct societies. This dichotomy can be traced from the very foundation of the colonies. The New England colonies were founded as examples of pure religion, each was to "be as a city upon a hill."1 In contrast to this worthy cause, the Chesapeake colonies were originally founded during the great search for gold, and later continued as slave-supported plantation colonies. The New Englanders would come to prosper through their hard work, thrift, and the quality of their commitment to God and each other. The South, conversely, prospered because of the quantity of her land and the great staple crops harvested there.…
And since their masters placed such a high importance on wealth and making a profit, giving out the bare minimum to their servants would have played well into their bottom line and their pocket books. And then when you think of the 1620’s and the colonies farming, plantations, and crops are what first comes to mind, doctors and the availability of medicine on the other hand, are not. And this could be because there were many miles between each of the plantations, due to the lack of roads and cities around. So they had to endure all this and more with no help to get them through it. And to top it off, after everything they endured, they were subject to their masters wants and needs so they had to push on, and keep on with the…
William Penn brought a group of Quakers from England to Pennsylvania for freedom of religion for themselves and others. Silver describes the immigration of Irish and German settlers who came for religious freedom or financial reasons. They came for free land and became squatters on land owned by Penn and spread out to land claimed by the Indians. Silver describes the chaos between the different nationalities, the religious groups and the Indians. Although a few men tried to bring unity to provide support and protection, Silver states that it seemed it was a “collection of people, all laboring to deepen the trenches between them”. (20)…
The History of the United States of America would have differ greatly if not for the founding of the Pennsylvania Colony. One of our most sacred beleifs might not be the same if not for the Quakers in Pennsylvania. While most of the other colonists did believe in the idea of freedom of religion they were only okay with it if you were practicing their religion. Another major change in American history the Pennsylvania colony had was the advancement in technology and Higher education. While I believe that Americans would eventually get on the same path as the Pennsylvania colonists it would have taken much longer which could alter history greatly. Without the Colony of Pennsylvania the Scrolls of American history would have been completely…
The region’s economic success was second to religious beliefs. New England originally existed as a plantation of Religion, not a plantation of Trade. (Doc J). The Puritans believed that wealth was a sign of God’s favor, and they worked hard to make sure that they were at the “top of the hill”. They became merchants and participated in the commercial trading centers of the New World. The Puritan’s importance of being God’s favorite demonstrates the development of New England’s economy.…
New England and the Chesapeake region were very influential in the founding and prosperity of the United States. Both were founded by English explorers and both were able to thrive because of the determination and bravery of Englishmen. But even with these similarities, by the 1700’s, the settlements were drastically different. The New England settlement turned into an aristocratic colony focused on the belief in God and religious freedom while the Chesapeake region turned into agricultural society with men who also were seeking gold. When the settlers reached New England they were focused in starting a colony with a great sense of community and religion. The majority of people who went to New England…
Colonialism is a global phenomenon that’s been occurring for centuries in the world as we know it. It is the act of a foreign, more powerful nation taking control of a region, area of land or civilization and establishing it as a colony. William Penn’s colony, established in 1681 stands as a firm example of colonialism where an existing region or territory was taken control of by a greater foreign power (England, in this case). William Penn is praised today for his treatment of the native Lenape and his vision of religious harmony, however this era of symbiosis degraded over time. Dutch and Scandinavian settlers from before the colony was under Penn’s ownership shared and co-existed with the Lenape, with a fair and effective justice system,…
Should William Penn be a heroic figure to American history? Throughout British proprietary colonization of the Americas, there were many different motives for claiming American soil by those whom were audacious enough to consider the prospect of funding a distant statehood. Penn claimed to see his colony as a “holy experiment” (page XIII); who differed from its “peers” in the respect that it had intent to provide refuge to those whom faced religious persecution, even so, the “devout” Quaker, eventually allowed to fall into a state of neglect and sink to the level of its peers. Ironically the people of Pennsylvania became so intolerant of other religions, that, not even after four decades, Paralleled their English “oppressors”. Eventually, even Penn gave up on his colony and sold it, nullifying the basis of its moral foundation. Penn founded the colony on the idea that every man could love one another as a brother would his own flesh and blood, which, if truly observed by Penn, would never be compromised to the influence of social dogma. Penn should not, by any standard, be considered an American Hero.…
In the 1800’s women’s work exhausting, difficult the society was unappreciative. Women who couldn’t afford slaves to help were put permanently on household duties. Women would cook, clean, make clothing, take care of domestic animals, hunt, fish, and protect their family. There was a lot of work to be done as a colonial woman, especially since most had more than 8 kids to take care of. The wife of a family was an essential component. Without a strong and productive wife a family would struggle just to survive. Yet even though women had worked extremely hard day in and day out to ensure care of their family they were not allowed to speak among men, could not vote, and could not take part in government decisions.…
The primary factor in why the New England and Chesapeake regions developed into two distinct societies were their initial motives. The colonist that settled in New England went in search of religious freedom and to flee persecution by King Charles I and Arch Bishop Laud. As preacher John Winthrop stated in A Model of Christian Charity in 1630, the Puritans wanted to become “a city upon a hill”(A). By becoming this “city” the Puritans wanted everyone to look at them as a model for a perfect society. In contrast, the Chesapeake colonists’ motives were money and land. Initially all the colonist came with gold tests instead of supplies with the thought of striking it rich, as John Smith said onboard the Arbela, “There was no talk…but dig gold, wash gold, refine gold load gold…”(F). This obsession for gold was the main reason for the “starving time,” where all the gentlemen refused to hunt or gather, thus starving and dying. Eventually, as a result of the…