After choosing our
After choosing our
Dethorne Graham, who is a diabetic, asked a friend, William Berry, to drive him to a store to purchase some juice to neutralize the start of an insulin reaction. When Dethorne Graham entered the store, he saw the number of people that would be ahead of him, Dethorne Graham hurried out and asked William Berry to drive him to a friend's house instead. Connor, a Charlotte, North Carolina police officer, became wary after seeing Dethorne Graham quickly enter and leave the store. Officer Connor followed William Berry's car, about half a mile from the store, he made an investigative stop and ordered Dethorne Graham And William Berry to wait while he found out what had happened in the store.…
1. 01/01/2014, Matthew Penney's body was discovered copying on the Oakfield Park Road, a country region outside Halifax. He had been shot in the head. On January fifth, the police addressed Caitlin Thompson about Mr. Penney going to a New Year's Eve party at her home. The police came to trust Ms. Thompson had deluded them and she was in this way accused of open fiendishness.…
Before the supreme court case Plessy v Ferguson was put into action African Americans and caucasians had separate everything, due to racial discrimination. Plessy v Ferguson began whenever a man named Homer Plessy was arrested for sitting in a “white only” car. After going to court multiple times with this case, the supreme court set the doctrine Plessy v Ferguson in place. The doctrine stated that it was constitutional to have separate facilities for both caucasians and African Americans as long as the facilities were “equal”.…
The New York Court of Appeals decision should be upheld in regards to Riggs et al v. Palmer case because one should not be granted inheritance by murdering one’s ancestor. For this reason, the New York Court of Appeals has decided on a naturalistic approach, which has deemed Elmer Palmer guilty for murdering his grandfather, thereby prohibiting Palmer from getting anything from his grandfather’s will. This essentially means that the court argues that judges use their morals in order to determine the outcome of cases. Therefore, rejecting the idea that it is morally acceptable to murder someone in order to personally benefit from their death. As a result, there has been a heated debate between naturalists like Judge Earl who argue that Elmer…
McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States Introduction The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24, 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent them in defense. However the oral arguments in the case pointed out that it was unclear on whether the defendant’s right to an attorney allows for him to an independent expert who would be devoted in advocating specifically for the defense’s case.…
If nothing else, young George Stinney, accused and convicted of killing two young girls and executed at age 14 by the state of South Carolina in 1944, is the poster child for why now an appeal is automatic in a Capital Murder case where execution is a possible sentence. Secondly, Stinney’s death makes a case for why the Supreme Court has ruled that children and the mentally deficient should not be subjected to the death penalty – they cannot adequately stand-up for themselves against law enforcement and the criminal justice system. Thirdly, Stinney’s 3 hour trial (and guilty verdict handed-down in only 10 minutes by an all-white jury) is an illustration of why juries should be made-up of a group of the defendant’s peers – and fourthly, the…
In 2011 Lafler V. Cooper was a case where Cooper was being charged with assault with intent to murder and three other offenses for shooting a woman in the thigh and buttocks after missing a shot in her head. In criminal court they offered to dismiss two of the charges and to recommend a 51-85 month sentence on the other two in exchange for a guilty plea. After entering the guilty plea, he then rejected the offer after his lawyer told him that the prosecution would be unable to establish intent to murder because the victim had been shot below the waist. Criminal…
The reason I chose this case was due to the fact it was a popular case throughout my childhood and because my cousin was a quadriplegic and had a form of cerebral palsy where she was limited to being taken care of by medical and hospital staff I was just a small child at this time my family would have regular visits with her One summer she got extremely sick and went into a coma my aunt then had to make the decision to keep her on life support or to let her go So this case is very relevant to what happened but under different conditions and circumstances.…
In 1977 a 22-year female, Dianne Kimberly Rawlinson attempt to seek employment with the Dothard Alabama State prison system. Ms. Rawlinson only weight about 110 pounds when she applied for the occupation. Alabama State at the time had a weight requirement for employment was a minimum 120 pounds. Rawlinson’s application for employment as a correctional counselor in Alabama was rejected; therefore, she failed to meet the minimum 120-pound weight requirement of an Alabama statute, which also establishes a height minimum of 5 feet 2 inches. (Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977)…
United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments.…
Hartford Connecticut police arrested William Malloy during a gambling raid in 1959. After pleading guilty to a misdemeanor, for selling a pool, Malloy was sentenced to one year in jail and fined $500. However, the sentence was suspended after 90 days and Malloy was placed on two-year’s probation. Almost a year and a half after entering his plea, a Superior Court appointed referee ordered Malloy to testify about gambling and other criminal goings-on in Hartford County. Malloy refused; "on grounds, it may tend to incriminate [him]" he was in turn imprisoned for contempt and held until willing to answer questions. Malloy then filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his incarceration. On appeal from the Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors ruling, upholding an adverse Superior Court denial, the Supreme Court granted certiorari.…
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (http://www.law.cornell.edu).…
Now, the reason the Bill of Rights is one of the topics I chose is because it was a monumental undertaking for the nation to establish ground rules that would forever shape the American people’s civil liberties. Additionally, the Bill of Rights also highlights how the United States’ forward thinking differed from any other country of that era. Furthermore, I felt it is my duty as an American to learn the Bill of Rights more…
Cited: Alderman, Ellen, and Caroline Kennedy. In Our Defense: the Bill of Rights in Action.…
References: MAJEROL, V., & Liptak, A. (2011). The Bill of Rights, Then & Now. New York Times Upfront, 144(7), 18-21.…