Personal Idiolect Report

Reflect on some aspects of your own personal idiolect including perhaps some criticism made of it by adults.
According to the ‘The Daily Mail’ children will try to adapt linguistically when in different environments. This was evident in section two; the police adult asks whether I would like a “glarss” of water, I consequently respond “I would love a glarss of water”. In the current age, in my eyes, it is seen to be more posh when adding the “ar” sound in substitute of an “a” sound. There are many examples: bath to barth, etc. I also describe the upper class’ dialect to have a more ‘grizzly’ base – lower frequency. This may be seen as a lack of confidence in my idiolect and accent; I have noted that I don’t speak very comfortably with people of higher intelligence or authority as I am always conscious of my idiolect and sociolect.
This has probably derived from my desire of a fast paced conversation. However, they encouraged my use of my body language; face gestures (paralinguistic language as they believed it showed that I was interested whereas my use of phatic language did not leave me to an open conversation.
After several people I regularly converse with completed a questionnaire bases on my idiolect, I found that people can interpret my speech differently to how I think it sounds. For example, they noticed that I use the words ‘like’ frequently, although this comes naturally to me and is therefore not something I notice. Also, they noticed that my idiolect is explicit and gets straight to the point; therefore the individuals I questioned do not think I use a lot of hedge in my