The philosophy of zero tolerance was to deter students from suspension worthy activity or dangerous activity by incorporating police officers into the schools and programs that would suspend, expel and arrest you if you began to stray down the wrong path. This was a reaction to Columbine because they wanted to take preventative measures, not reactive measures. It is stated in the movie that they were scared if they didn’t address the issues in a serious way in the first place, even if the student had no prior record, then something more detrimental could happen. The change within schools to zero tolerance policies that could not only result in school related punishments but actual arrests as we see in this film led to the more placements in the juvenile justice system. Ultimately, zero tolerance rested on the notion that kids are mini adults and thought that a deterrence program would keep them from behaving like…
It was clearly humiliating to see all students against him. One of the students went to the point of chasing her down but luckily enough, she fell into a speeding car. The incidents…
Zero-tolerance policies often result in suspensions and expulsions, they frequently remove students from the classroom, which in turn moves them onto the school-to-prison pipeline. The school to-prison pipeline starts when teachers and school police assign punishments to misbehaving students that remove them from the classroom. These students then become much more likely to be introduced into the criminal justice system, even if their “crime” was relatively insignificant. The punishments that arise with zero-tolerance policies have been as drastic as leading to…
Skiba, R., et al. 2006. “Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations”. American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force.…
Zero tolerance policy is not appropriate for young adults at all times. Robert Oppenheimer, a theoretical physicist, got really depressed after his fight with his mother and broke up with his girlfriend at the age of twenty-one. After he was forced to make films of beryllium in a laboratory in Cambridge, he dosed an apple and tried to poison his tutor. Though this was a severe case, the staff at Cambridge considered that it was the student’s first violation and they did not want to ruin this young gentleman’s future, so they did not file charges. Many people, including me, would argue that zero tolerance policy should be applied since the student was attempting to kill somebody. However, admittedly, the use of discretion in this matter saved Oppenheimer’s future and changed the atomic history for he was later known as, “the father of the atomic bomb” for his contribution in the Manhattan Project and the World War II project. If Oppenheimer had been expelled by Cambridge because zero tolerance policy, we might have lost a great physicist.…
School institutions simply cannot tolerate misbehavior by students. It is the school’s responsibility to maintain a safe, and controlled learning environment for everyone within the school institutions. Students truly cannot learn and teachers cannot teach amongst disruption and chaos. This is no controversy. So, to try and achieve this goal, schools have adapted and fiercely implemented the zero tolerance policies. Schools feel these policies have made them more effective in handing disciplinary issues. It mandates a consistency of discipline for certain offenses. Parents feel the zero tolerance policies ensures the safety of their children while at school. Others feel removing the disruptive students altogether, creates a better learning environment for behaved students. But it is important to remember the zero tolerance polices do not distinguish between major and minor offenses. While school systems feel, this sends clarifying message to students, it could be sending the wrong message, ultimately forcing children into the prison…
There’s people who support the idea, in the middle, and those who are against it. David L. Stader in his article, “Zero Tolerance as Public Policy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”, partially leans on the side of keeping the zero tolerance policy. Stader tells us that drugs, physical assaults, and weapons are generally minor or not huge problems with less than 2% of schools ranking them as serious problems. Stader follows up with more statistics such as from 1993-1999, students in grades 9-12 had a percentage of 12 of carrying a weapon. The percentage then falls down to 7% down the road. Stader agrees that zero tolerance sends a powerful message to the school community that violent behavior will not be tolerated. Schools need strong, effective policies to protect our students and to help them feel…
Due to the financial crisis there have been many changes made to government programs to reduce costs and help with debt. Many of these cuts are happening statewide, in America’s public schools. The first programs that are being cut are the art programs, and the excuse is that the core classes are more important. The argument is that children need to be more focused on test scores in Math, Science, English and History. It is unfair to single out art classes, there should be a more even spread of budget cuts, not just the sole elimination of the arts. There are parents who are indifferent with the arts and they are unfazed by their removal from elementary public schools. What many of these parents do not recognize is that there are actually benefits of the arts that help with core subjects. Some benefits are strengthening problem solving skills, stimulating critical thinking and helping developmental growth. There is also a duel component that shows that there is a direct correlation between SAT test scores and art programs in schools, as well as higher participation and attendance. It has also been shown that the arts can help boost the economy.…
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore, send the homeless tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door.” Reference? America has long been the land of freedom and hope to the world, and the American military is what has kept her that way. People have forgotten how important and valuable the military is to the world that we live in. As part of the Budget Control Act of 2011, automatic sequestration calls for $1.2 trillion in lowered federal spending, with 50% coming from defense and 50% coming from non-defense budgets. If Congress cannot reach an agreement, these cuts will reduce the Department of Defense spending by about $55 billion dollars. On September 11, 2001, the United States faced a difficult time in which 3,000 lives were lost due to an attack upon the U.S. by terrorists who hijacked airplanes and crashed them into the Twin Towers in New York City, the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and the United States Pennsylvania! That day, 9/11, has become a day in which we remember the lives that were lost and the families who were affected by such a tragedy. We called on our military once again, and they were there to protect our country. I am against automatic sequestration towards the military and military programs for many reasons.…
The zero tolerance policy is not one to take lightly, however it seems a little harsh for an elementary school setting. What one child may think of as a toy, an adult might consider it a weapon causing the child to be expelled when all he or she was doing was playing. Suspensions have doubled over the past two decades(Carr, 2012). The policy is needed, yet it is very broad and should be looked into. Elementary students are not mature enough to realize what could be considered a weapon. In certain cases, such as the case being reviewed, the policy is too harsh and could be very damaging to a student. A 2011 study shows that students who were suspended or expelled were twice as likely to repeat a grade as compared to those who did not receive such punishment (Carr, 2012).…
Zero Tolerance policies need to be replaced with fair and reasonable alternatives. “The need for less-punitive methods in the reduction of problem behaviors in schools and mandated intervention is catching momentum, with a growing number of advocacy organizations and membership associations calling for more effective and fair approaches to school discipline” (Teasley 133). Zero tolerance policies need to be replaced with reasonable punishments, counseling, and programs designed to help the students. One alternative that some schools are finding success with is restorative justice approach.…
In the United States, the zero tolerance policy was put into place to help discipline the students and make school a better place for all. Increasingly, there has been many acts of violence in schools. School districts have decided to have tighter rules and policies to help keep the students safe but the real question is: Have they gone too far? I think schools should be lighter on the punishments when they believe a student has done something wrong. If they believe the student has done something against the rules, they should state their reasons why and how it affects the school, its environment and society itself.…
At my high school there was a zero tolerance policy which meant regardless of an act committed in school or out of school you would be held accountable. We had the local police stationed within the school which handled such matters. It was well known that if you did something wrong you would be going to “juvie” regardless of the severity. I noticed my junior and senior year that many students were being “locked up” for extravagant amount of time for small level offenses. For example, my neighbor got into a fight with his father at the dinner table. He threw the steak sitting on his plate in anger. His father, a military man, wanted to teach him a lesson so he called the police. With his intentions being to have the police speak with him in regards to authority. In all actuality his son was brought out in handcuffs, went before a juvenile judge and spent six months in a detention center followed by probation.…
The wise one once said that when in the early 20th century, most of the continent in Europe had imperialism. I believe that imperialism was the primary cause of the conflicts in Europe that became WW1. The definition of imperialism is one territory or country taking control over a lighter one to control them. Most people, historians disagree on whether the primary momentum for imperialism was cultural and economic. In early twentieth century, Spain’s imperial power was dwindling. Although, most people in every continent believe that imperialism was the main causal agent of the first world war. An Imperialism had an unequal relationship, form an empire, forced other countries and citizens, even resulting domination and subordination of economics…
A zero-tolerance policy was vastly adopted following the 1999 Columbine shooting. It was created in order to make schools safer by giving harsh punishments no matter the circumstances of the issue nor the child. By using this policy, minor mistakes made by students are criminalized and can give them a criminal…