Parents do not want to be bothered with meager problems such as taking their kids to practice or school. Most parents work, and go out of their way to take their teens where they need to go. Not only is it unfair to the parents, but the teenagers are learning no responsibility if they rely on adults for everything. They crave freedom, and a license is the only opportunity for them to grab a minuscule part of it.
Go to any family gathering as a teenager and be prepared to answer the ancient question, …show more content…
Two years is not a long time, so the level of maturity in drivers is not going to rise that much. An eighteen-year-old is still a high school senior, only a grade or two above a sophomore. Though numerous people believe waiting the two extra years would lower the risk of crashing, that is not entirely true. Most crashes caused by young drivers are caused by inexperience driving, but a sophomore and a senior with the same amount of time behind the wheel are equally inexperienced. If the law changes, two years of potential driving experience are wasted.
In conclusion, it is unfair to everyone involved to raise the allowed age. It is unfair to the parents who do not have time to take their kids everywhere they need to go, and to the kids who do not want to rely as heavily on their parents. In the end, no matter what age someone is when they start driving, everyone will be equally inexperienced, so why take away two years of time behind the