Preview

Persuasive Essay: Capital Punishment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay: Capital Punishment
When turning on the television, radio, or simply opening the local newspaper, one is bombarded with news of arrests, murders, homicides, serial killers, and other such tragedies. It is a rare occasion to go throughout a day in this world and not hear of these things. So what should be done about this crime rate? Not only is it committing a crime, but today, it is signing your life over to the government. This is a risk one is taking when he decides to pull a trigger or plunge a knife, but is it really up to our justice system to decide one's fate? There are many issues that address this question of capital punishment such as religion, the effect on society, restitution being denied, the possible "wrongly accused", and the rights of the convicted. But how often do these concepts creep into the public's mind when it hears of our 'fair, trusty' government taking away someone's breathing rights?
<br>
<br>The Bible states "Thou shalt not kill," and this being a sin should have to be amended within oneself. However, the Bible also states "Don't judge others' personal convictions." It is the government's responsibility to punish people that disobey the law to keep our world in tact but is it their right to take away their lives? It is a Christian's responsibility to point out to those who sin that they do so and this country, trusting in God as it says it does, should do just that. So if the government stands strongly by this statement that's on the dollar bill, may they line up all the liars, adulterers, Buddhists, thieves, covetous and murderers at the chair. If they shall look into this one sin as so evil may they see all ten commandments so holy.
<br>
<br>The society is so confused as to what is "right." More and more children are becoming murderers themselves. The reason is obvious: they see that if they kill someone they go to jail, get the death penalty, and the government, who they know as the "good guy" kills them for punishment. Lesson learned: the finger is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment is the ultimate sentence administered by the government for committing dangerous offenses. The word “capital” derives from the Latin word “capitalis,” meaning “of the head.” Original instances of capital punishment included beheading and hanging, leading to the use of word “capital” today. Through history, communities have considered some types of crimes so terrifying that the death penalty has been enacted for them. Over time, changing moralistic values and notions on government authority have limited the number and sorts of crimes considered worthy of death. Many countries have eliminated capital punishment totally, dismissing it as an inhumane reaction to criminal…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are not many absolute truths in the world. Almost every point can be argued and justified. But if there is one truth universally recognized, one truth upon which societies the world over have been based on, it is that murder is wrong. The willful termination of a life is immoral. If we as a society accept that to be true, how then can we condone the death penalty? How is government sanctioned murder a moral option? The legal system is not fool proof, nothing man-made is. How then can we claim that an imperfect court of law, pervious to human error and persuasion, has the power to lay down the most perfectly irreversible solution of them all: death. Even after the appellate courts have been exhausted, it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime they did not do. If there is even that small possibility, how can we, in all good conscious, make it legal to put someone to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of torture, most of us will readily agree that torturing someone in order to get information is not the answer. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how guilty a person is, and what should be done in the case of a bombing. On the one hand, people argue that torture is unconstitutional and should not be practiced because it questions a person’s morality and what they are willing to do in order to get results. On the other hand, however, others argue that we should allow torture because it is more just than allowing thousands of innocents to die because we didn’t want to question a single person. I have mixed feelings on the topic. While I recognize that our actions may be for the greater good, we cannot allow ourselves to lose our morality because of it. I do not believe that a person should be tortured for information unless it is under specific circumstances. What I mean by this is that people should not torture someone unless that person is obviously guilty or it is…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussions of ticking time bombs, one controversial issue has been how to deal with the alleged guilty terrorist once he is captured. On the one hand, some people, including Michael Levin, a libertarian writer and educator, argue that it is in the US government’s right to torture the guilty terrorist because his knowledge could be used to save the lives of millions. On the other hand, others, such as Philip Heymann, who is a writer that had worked in the government field, firmly states that torture should never be used because the chance that it will produce true and useful information is nearly impossible and it is vastly more crucial to preserve the international bans on torture. Shirley Jackson elaborates on Heymann’s view when she…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death penalty is the punish meant of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime and there are twenty-two countries in the world that still impose the death penalty for capital crimes, the United states is one of them. If you are charged with capital homicide, and the jury of twelve of your peers proclaims, “We find the defendant guilty as charged”(Condenaststore). Then it is simple, you are going to forfeit your life, so abolishing the death penalty or there’s no coming back from the grave.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her” (John 8:7). The death penalty is wrong…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you want a person who rapes, murders people or even acts extreme violence to hurt you or a loved one? There are families out there that lose a loved one to an adolescent just because they wanted to see what it's like to kill another human being. These families are the ones that suffer and can never get back what they lost. These teenagers do deserve a sentence of life without parole because they have committed such heinous crimes. I agree with the minority of the Supreme Court Justices who believe in mandatory life without parole because those adolescents broke the law, you must think about the victim’s family, and these teenagers killed another human being and planned to do so.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic in America, and people usually shy away from it, but speaking about controversial topics can help us come close to actually find solutions. This exercise was conducted in my survey of law class in which, we had gone over several homicide cases in which the criminal received the death penalty. In the end of the lesson, our teacher asked a simple question “raise your hand if you believe in the death penalty”. I was appalled to see that more than half believed it was worth it. In my mind it was clear that even though that person could have murdered another human being, we have no jurisdiction to kill them, and we would be no better as civilized being if we killed him.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in my generation I have noticed a huge amount of incarcerations that I’ve seen publicly on television and in the media. The Smarter Sentencing Act does not repeal any federal mandatory minimum sentences, but instead reduces prison costs and populations by creating a fairer, less costly minimum terms for nonviolent drug offenders (). The 4 main things it will do will be to save billions spent on incarcerating nonviolent drug offenders, save expensive prison beds for more dangerous offenders, remedy a long-standing racial injustice and strengthen black communities, and address over-criminalization ().…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steve Earle is just one of the many protesters of the death penalty, stating “. . . The death penalty is based on the idea that this is a democracy, and in a democracy the government is me, and if the government kills somebody then I am killing somebody.” His quote is one of many negative views people have on the death penalty. The death penalty is based around the idea that it is acceptable to execute someone for killing. However, this is disagreed on by many Americans. In a survey from the PEW Research Center, results show that 56% of Americans still support the death penalty, compared to the 62% in 2011, and the 78% in the 1996 survey. The percent of people that still support the death penalty is at an all-time low, and is drastically dropping. This is an almost surefire indication that shows society wants the death penalty to be abolished. Although the death penalty is still an option in some states, it should be discontinued because of the immorality of execution, the staggering costs, and the potential injustices such as false execution.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sixteen- year-old is prosecuted in adult court and is given the life sentence without any chance at parole. He doesn’t understand what is happening. His brain isn’t developed like any adults, nor does her comprehend the court surroundings. He is practically a victim to the justice system as he is being treated the same as a thirty-year-old criminal. Any offender under the age of twenty-one should be separated from adults in the justice system.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death row should be put to an end it can be prevented to save the money and obeys the rights of citizens.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They believe that the death penalty is the ultimate and irreversible denial of human rights. By working toward the abolition of the death penalty worldwide, Amnesty International USA's Program to Abolish the Death Penalty looked to discontinue the cycle of violence created by a system consumed with economic and racial bias and corrupted by human error. The death penalty is a violation of human rights. More than half the countries in the world have now abolished the death penalty in law or practice.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another argument is that death penalty is not a constraining factor. The most common argument for death penalty says that this measure of punishment is a strong restraining factor, since killing of a felon keeps others from committing similar crimes. At a first glance, this argument seems quite reasonable. However, it is important to approach the question of death penalty less disconcertingly. Effectiveness margins exist not only in death penalty, but also in other types of punishment, and that is not always taken into account ("Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty.").…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays