Death Penalty Argumentative Essay
A sixteen- year-old is prosecuted in adult court and is given the life sentence without any chance at parole. He doesn’t understand what is happening. His brain isn’t developed like any adults, nor does her comprehend the court surroundings. He is practically a victim to the justice system as he is being treated the same as a thirty-year-old criminal. Any offender under the age of twenty-one should be separated from adults in the justice system.
According to some, teenagers above the age of eighteen are mature enough, like an adult, to know the difference between legal and illegal. This isn’t exactly true because the teenage brain is not developed the same as an adult’s until the age of at most twenty-three. Their brains are not at the same …show more content…
However, the death penalty stops any chance of the juvenile offender getting better and being able to return to society. The life-without-parole is quite similar to the death penalty.
Granted, juveniles should be prosecuted in the same court as adults, assuming that teenagers understand the law like adults but this isn’t exactly true because juveniles are more likely the criminalize themselves by accident. This is because teenagers don’t know the law and they are more likely to say something without thinking because their brains aren’t fully developed.
It may be true that some believe that adult prisons are better for teenager offenders. However juveniles are actually more likely to commit suicide in adult …show more content…
While at Rikers, Browder faced constant physical abuse from prison guards and fellow inmates and spent most of his time in solitary confinement. He was never tried. After his release, he spoke openly about the trauma he experienced, saying,"I'm mentally scarred right now.... Because there are certain things that changed about me and they might not go back." On June 6, Browder committed suicide. (Raise The
According to some, teenagers above the age of eighteen are mature enough, like an adult, to know the difference between legal and illegal. This isn’t exactly true because the teenage brain is not developed the same as an adult’s until the age of at most twenty-three. Their brains are not at the same …show more content…
However, the death penalty stops any chance of the juvenile offender getting better and being able to return to society. The life-without-parole is quite similar to the death penalty.
Granted, juveniles should be prosecuted in the same court as adults, assuming that teenagers understand the law like adults but this isn’t exactly true because juveniles are more likely the criminalize themselves by accident. This is because teenagers don’t know the law and they are more likely to say something without thinking because their brains aren’t fully developed.
It may be true that some believe that adult prisons are better for teenager offenders. However juveniles are actually more likely to commit suicide in adult …show more content…
While at Rikers, Browder faced constant physical abuse from prison guards and fellow inmates and spent most of his time in solitary confinement. He was never tried. After his release, he spoke openly about the trauma he experienced, saying,"I'm mentally scarred right now.... Because there are certain things that changed about me and they might not go back." On June 6, Browder committed suicide. (Raise The