Preview

Persuasive Essay On Privacy Vs Security

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
997 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay On Privacy Vs Security
The debate between national security and privacy right is a debate that the country has been struggling with since 9/11. Privacy vs security is the trend of our generation. This topic always come to mind when we think of technology and its effect. And now in the wake of the San Bernardino terrorist attack, many may say giving up privacy is the price of security. Should we give up our Fourth Amendment Right for the sake of security? Apple and the FBI were in a court tussle about an iPhone 5c used by one of the shooters who died after killing 14 people last December in San Bernardino, California. Apple set a stage for legal showdown that could help define a constitutional right to privacy for Americans in the digital age. Apple is doing the right thing by saying NO and trying to guarantee that nobody can violate their customer’s privacy. It isn’t just about the San Bernardino killer’s secrets, it’s about everyone’s privacy. These iPhones contain important data and should be secured with all means. Apple also need to protect their worldwide brand by resisting the FBI’s request.
Apple has cooperated in the past to unlock dozens of phones in other cases, so why can’t it help the FBI unlock this one? Apple helped the government in unlocking some devices before, but they changed their stance after
…show more content…
If indeed they found a way to do it without the help of Apple, they better protect all the information. They wouldn't be ignoring the this kind of information, not the least of which would be what would happen if the very terrorists they claim to be fighting got hold of this information for themselves. This has less to do with security and far more to do with some in positions of power throwing their weight around trying to scare people into submission so that people will think more highly of them than they deserve. Privacy is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Binks Vs Mckay Case Study

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On May 12, 2016 the court case Binks/McKay vs the United States challenged the idea of the Fourth Amendment. The case explains the situation between Binks and McKay, who claimed that the FBI violated their Fourth amendment rights when the FBI searched through their Facebook messages after being suspected of being terrorists. This occured when Binks and McKay were discovered to have been communicating with a supposed ISIS member. They had claimed to have no intentions of joining the terrorist group. In this case, Sam and Melanie (petitioners) reminded us that a warrant and reason for searching is a necessity when it comes to violating one’s right to privacy. However, court justices Danny and Nick both asked similarly: “Why do you think that violates their privacy?…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How comfortable would you be with a government having access to your personal information and data on your phone? A recent incident involving a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, sparked a controversy between Apple and the Federal Bureau of investigation. Following the attack by two individuals committed an act of terror, killing 14 people, the iPhone belonging to one of the terrorists was found. As you may know, your organization is requesting the court for Apple's forced assistance in weakening the encryption on an IPhone related to the San Bernardino terrorist attacks and supposedly has vital information on it. These terrorist attacks were performed by ISIS's lone wolves, named Syed Rizwan Farook, who owns the phone and Tashfeen Malik, his wife. In my opinion, the phone shouldn't be cracked for three reasons. First of all because it undermines America's founding principles and it…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument being presented in the given piece is the FBI asking permission from Apple to have the ability to access people’s private messages in their apple products. This argument came into conversation after the terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. The author’s claim towards the argument is that the FBI should not be able to have the ability to tap into people’s individual cell phones. Although the FBI’s idea of decoding Apple’s encryption code in order to gain access to tapping into all iPhones under service, it seems that the cons outweigh the pros of this certain situation. However, there has to be a completely different way the FBI can develop a better way to combat terrorism without interfering with all of Apple’s customers.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 4th Amendment is extremely important to our country. This amendment in the United States Constitution provides the right for people to be secure in their own person, paper, and home, protects against unreasonable search and seizures, and states that no warrant will be issued without probable cause. 4th Amendment laws are more strict than any other amendment, and leaves absolutely no wiggle room to allow changes. Despite these strict laws being in place the government is at war with Apple because Apple encrypts everything to make a very good security, and they say allowing the government into people's phones would be against the 4th Amendment. 4th Amendment laws are very important, and should be followed closely. The 4th Amendment helps…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apple can not maintain security and provide the FBI with a master key. Apple believes that privacy is important, “people use them to store an incredible amount of personal information”. Everyone has smartphones now and people keep classified information on there in their messages, photos, emails and contacts. Apple acknowledges the fact that people lost their lives due to the San Bernardino tragedy, “We were shocked and outraged by the deadly act of terrorism in San Bernardino Last December” “We have no sympathy for terrorist”. Apple is sorry that this happened that the terrorist was a apple customers and that they don't feel bad for him, but they have already helped the FBI in every way that they could. Apple should have detected the terrorism…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A current event in need of ethical examination is the dispute between Apple and the FBI over the unlocking of a criminal’s iPhone. Following the mass shooting in San Bernardino that took the lives of many individuals in early December 2015, the FBI turned to the shooter’s personal iPhone data for evidence, however, were unable to bypass Apple’s security measures on their own (Lichtblau & Benner, 2016). Unwilling to compromise the security of data, and quite frankly the trust of customers, Apple did not respond favorably when the FBI reached out to the tech giant for help in breaking into the phone (Lichtblau & Benner, 2016). According to Lichtblau and Benner (2016), Apple CEO, Jeff Cook maintains that…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apple couldn’t have maintained security and provide the FBI with the master key. Apple agrees that they “have no sympathy for terrorists. When the FBI has requested data that’s in our possession, we have provided it”. Apple is all for help the government when it comes to terrorism but it seems that it has gone too far. On the other hand Apple argues that, “ The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond our legal hands”. Which in other words is saying that Apple would feel as if their customers will be evaluating the loyalty that Apple has towards them if they give the government the master key. This all…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many debates between the company Apple and the Federal Bureau of Investigation about whether or not Apple should unlock the phone of Syed Farook, one of the San Bernardino attackers. Many say disrupting their privacy violates the fourth amendment, “No unlawful searches or seizures against any man, without a probable cause.” I highly believe this allows Apple to help the FBI to unlock the phone of the attackers. In the article, “PRO/CON: Should Apple have resisted FBI pressure to hack an iPhone?” By the Associated Press, the author disputes the reasons why Apple should unlock the of the San Bernardino attackers. In the article, “Should Apple help the FBI access iPhone data?” by Brian Mastroianni, the author discusses the ideas the FBI had to convince Apple to not make the wrong decision.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only would Apple’s main policy of privacy be violated if they let the FBI hack into Farook’s phone, but it would have damaged the company and our rights all together. “Basic American rights were at stake, and the purpose of the law is to protect people’s rights” (“PRO/CON: Should Apple have resisted FBI pressure to hack an iPhone?” Newsela). Technically, Apple has a right to refuse the orders of the FBI that reflects their company in a negative way. If Apple would have accepted the order of the FBI, our rights as Americans would have been at risk. Moreover, not only would our rights as Americans be at risk, the entire company could have been damaged because of what the law was asking for. “The FBI did not ask Apple to turn over information…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In most recent events the debate over the United States citizen’s rights to privacy has come up more and more frequently starting after the attacks of 9/11. The United States government has put into motion a number of precautionary levels of security and restraints on the American citizen’s out of fear of another large tragedy such as 9/11 and even more recently the Boston Bombing. The matter of if the added security precautions are therefore infringing on our Constitutional rights is a matter all in its own.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Triumph of The Nerds

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    it was not successfully due to high price and Apple suffered due to crucial mistake of making…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persuasive Essay

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In today’s society, people of all ages and genders are with their cell phones at all times. Whether it is while driving, walking down the aisle in a grocery store, or even in class, cell phones have become a part of everyday live. However, it is always a controversy in the classroom between teachers and students whether cell phone usage should be allowed in school. Students might enjoy using their cellular devises during class but this inflicts more harm than help towards everyone. The most harmful attributes of using a cell phone in class can be narrowed to simple distraction and cheating.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At what point is the level of national security a much higher priority than personal freedom for Americans? Ever since 9/11, the country’s way of balancing this problem was that even though personal freedom is very important, the priority for national security is at a much higher point during a time of war. Whenever the United States goes into a time of war or conflict, there are usually some changes to help increase the security level. There is no exact right or wrong answer to when too much national security overpowers the freedom of the individuals in America. The United States has history in which they have lowered the priority of personal freedom in order to reach a stronger national security importance in other cases other than 9/11. Some of these changes included the Japanese Internment Camps during World War II and the Patriot act after 9/11. Is the freedom we give up, worth the extra security?…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike Google, which makes Android openly available to a whole host of handset manufacturers (most recently Amazon's Kindle), targeting a mainstream audience and wide distribution, Apple has taken a more controlled approach to capturing the smartphone market. Very much like Rolls Royce, which targets the luxury market, so too is Apple targeting a higher end of the market. Indeed, the new Apple iPhone 5, which will debut later today, reaffirms Apple's position in the market place. High-end at a premium price with features, content and an end-to-end user experience superior to that offered by the competition.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apple

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For any product that Apple creates, the people who create it have to want it themselves…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays