Preview

What Is Apple's Loyalty To The Master Key

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Apple's Loyalty To The Master Key
Apple couldn’t have maintained security and provide the FBI with the master key. Apple agrees that they “have no sympathy for terrorists. When the FBI has requested data that’s in our possession, we have provided it”. Apple is all for help the government when it comes to terrorism but it seems that it has gone too far. On the other hand Apple argues that, “ The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond our legal hands”. Which in other words is saying that Apple would feel as if their customers will be evaluating the loyalty that Apple has towards them if they give the government the master key. This all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning of this book is about a test and how Jamee didn’t erase a problem on the board even though she got it right.Jamee felt like there was an imaginary spotlight on her she felt so nervous.The letter F was scrawled so big on Jamee’s paper but it was a different test that she took she barlely got that test back from her teacher.The teacher Mrs.Guessner was going over the answer’s with the class room when she handed back out the paper’s.Jamee was too mad to go over the answer because of that big F that she got on her paper.Mrs.Gussner told Jamee to take her school work a little more serious because of all the F’s she has had.Mrs.Gussner’s voice rose up at Jamee because it was an wrong answer.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How comfortable would you be with a government having access to your personal information and data on your phone? A recent incident involving a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, sparked a controversy between Apple and the Federal Bureau of investigation. Following the attack by two individuals committed an act of terror, killing 14 people, the iPhone belonging to one of the terrorists was found. As you may know, your organization is requesting the court for Apple's forced assistance in weakening the encryption on an IPhone related to the San Bernardino terrorist attacks and supposedly has vital information on it. These terrorist attacks were performed by ISIS's lone wolves, named Syed Rizwan Farook, who owns the phone and Tashfeen Malik, his wife. In my opinion, the phone shouldn't be cracked for three reasons. First of all because it undermines America's founding principles and it…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apple, Inc is one of the most innovative and top companies in the technology industry, being present in areas such as the computer industry, mobile phone, and music downloads. However, in recent years Apple, Inc has been under extreme scrutiny for being average in implementing their ethical and social responsibilities.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9-11 Vs Napoleon

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    American citizens were willing to give up some personal rights. Some Americans were willing to allow the government to snoop around reading their emails, text messages and listening to our phone calls. The government and Americans think that having access to these personal things, from everyone, will ensure a safer country. Those Americans wanted to convince people that the Nine-Eleven attacks may have been preventable if the government had access to personal emails, text messages, and phone calls. American just like the French went through a hard time and trials and now were willing to risk it all, so that those hard times won’t happen…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978 which prohibited electronic surveillance in the United States without proper warrants. The National Security Agency (NSA) wiretapping program contradicts this by allowing the NSA to conduct electronic surveillance without a warrant (“NSA”). Prior to the War on Terror, the government was allowed to secretly wiretap Americans and access their electronics with a judge's order due to FISA. After the attacks of September 11th, Congress allowed wiretapping without a specific judge's orders or even probable cause. Due to the Patriot Act, an act as a result from 9/11, the FBI could demand information from phone companies, internet service providers, banks, and even the U.S. Postal service without any court order as well (“Costs”). The Patriot Act is still to this day one of the most controversial acts in American history. This act is constantly criticized and makes people feel as if their freedom has been violated. People also feel as if it is very unnecessary because the only person that has ever been arrested due to this act was a taxi driver who tried to donate money to al-Qaeda…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    September 11, 2001 was the deadliest day for New York. Thousands died because of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. Two planes crashed into the twin towers while a third crashed into the pentagon and a fourth into a field in Pennsylvania. Something this big could not have been decided that morning, it needed to be planned. All the people involved need to know what they were going to do. This meant they had to have some form of communication along the way, whether it was through calls or texts. Imagine if all of this could have been prevented. All those lives that were lost could have been saved. If only the NSA would have known. Even though it violates the privacy act of the constitution, it is better to be safe than sorry, potential terrorist attacks could be stopped, and it will not matter if you are not doing anything wrong.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason is the Revolutionary War, this was a disagreement between Great Britain and the American colonies. The king himself had created a swamp of new buildings and offices. Hitler swamped and took them out. This is showing the colonies were in need of general searches. The British officers were just trying to received taxed goods. The next reason is Carroll v United States 1925. The United States supreme court was doing warrantless searches through automobiles. This is taking it too far, the US supreme court should not be able to go through somebody's vehicle without a warrant. There is no reasonable suspicion, this is just too far. Allowing Farook's Iphone to be unlocked allowed him to set up a terror attack. He was able to send drivers to locations and set up an attack. Apple took it too far and a chance of unlocking his Iphone to do…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This started with letters the NSA sent out to only a few private companies asking them for all their data. After most of the companies hiding there clients data and not handing over the information, the adiministatain started secretly approaching Telecom Companies asking them to participate in the NSA’s domestic spying program. Soon after that these companies started sending Internet and Telephone content to the NSA (Office of the Inspector General). Later in the year, a huge proportion of global Internet traffic flows through networks controlled by the United States, simply because eight of 15 global tier 1 telecommunications companies are American -- companies like AT&T, Century Link, XO Communications and, significantly, Verizon and more companies start sharing their telephone and internet Metadata with the…

    • 2151 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans are in favor of the Patriot Act because they are under the impression that it will increase national security in these perilous times. Supporters state that it reduces terrorists ' ability to operate within the United States by allowing law enforcement to access information such as bank statements, library records and emails without notifying individuals of the search. Supporters also claim that the act cultivates cooperation between the FBI and CIA, allowing officials to easily obtain information about individuals suspected to be threats to national security. In this way, the two organizations work together in an unprecedented fashion to thwart criminal activity, including terrorist plots.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act, better known as the USA PATRIOT Act, or simply the PATRIOT Act was introduced on October 24, 2001, only 45 days after the devastating terrorists attacks of 9/11. It passed nearly unanimously, with only one person total in both the House or Representatives and the Senate voting against it. This law has many aspects, but perhaps the most controversial is the authorization of surveillance procedures, and the legitimacy of these provisions in regards to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The following is an examination of the moral and homeland security implications this Act has on the American people and the American Constitution.…

    • 2948 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 4th Amendment is extremely important to our country. This amendment in the United States Constitution provides the right for people to be secure in their own person, paper, and home, protects against unreasonable search and seizures, and states that no warrant will be issued without probable cause. 4th Amendment laws are more strict than any other amendment, and leaves absolutely no wiggle room to allow changes. Despite these strict laws being in place the government is at war with Apple because Apple encrypts everything to make a very good security, and they say allowing the government into people's phones would be against the 4th Amendment. 4th Amendment laws are very important, and should be followed closely. The 4th Amendment helps…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's Privacy

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a U.S. law called the Patriot Act was passed under the Bush administration. The goal of passing this law was to strengthen domestic security and broaden the powers of law-enforcement agencies with regards to identifying and stopping terrorists (Grabianowski). The privacy of the American public was first questioned in 2006 when USA Today reported that the NSA had “been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth” and was “using the data to analyze calling patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity” (Greenwald). This article referred to a secret…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    NSA's invasion of privacy

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The NSA surveillance executed an unlawful invasion of privacy through tracking. They were caught tracking people’s cellphones, but the information gathered was supposedly never used. They have no right to track people’s cellphones because it is considered an invasion of privacy. According to Wyden the NSA is quite secretive about the collection of tracked cell data. “…the intelligence leadership has decided to leave most of the real story secret-even when the truth would not compromise national security” (qtd. in “NSA Chief says”). The NSA is keeping information from people which create a less secure nation. This clarifies that the NSA is hiding more than just the information on the tracked cellphones. McDonald described the NSA’s surveillance as, “It’s like peekaboo, right? You have an entire world watching you and you just don’t know it” (qtd. in Chuang). She describes what it is like to be under NSA surveillance and not know anything about it. McDonald clarifies that by having the NSA track a person they are invading their privacy. This demonstrates that the NSA can track a person at any given time to see what they’re doing and the person could be clueless about it. The author states that, “The Times reported that the NSA was exploiting huge collections of personal data to create…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Patriot Act

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    September 11, 2001 America was changed forever. The United Stated felt the effects of terrorism and realized just how vulnerable we are as a nation. Having experienced such a horrific event forced our government to look at things more closely which brought about the USA Patriot Act. This allowed federal agents the ability to detain non-citizens while also monitoring such devices as email and internet and an increase in monitoring student visas. Many argue the USA Patriot Act and say it is a violation our certain rights. They feel as though the government is invading their privacy and civil liberties. This paper will address the advantages and disadvantages to the USA Patriot Act.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naikon the long-run this would have ended up being just another tool for the malicious users. The other way is what Mr. Tim Cook actually did i.e. to provide maximum support to the government on case to case basis but refuse to provide a backdoor or any information to bypass the securitythus,maintaining customer privacy. I believe Mr. Tim Cook took a wise, appropriate decision.He even so far as to update the security in the newer OS’s so that even his own engineers could not bypass the security anymore.This helped him maintain his commitment of Private Life, his responsibilities towards his customers (which is considered outside Firm’s boundaries as per the case study). Q3. Last yearSenatorsFeinstein and Burr released “Backdoor” Anti-Encryption Bill. Review the draft online and provide your insights.Answer. The Anti-Encryption bill called as “Compliance with Court Orders Act”was introduced by Senators Richard Burr (R-NC) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) (who represents California, where most of the companies that would be impacted are based) inthe month ofFebruary 2016as a result of increasingly rancorous debate over encryptionbetween the government agencies like FBI and the tech companies like Apple. If this bill was passed, it would have had requiredtech firms to decrypt customers’ data at a court’s request, essentiallyrequired theengineers to make their encryption reversible for investigators, create vulnerabilities into their products or servicesalso,potentially…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays