Peter Singer's Ted Talk Argument

1) Kuper uses a calm tone in his Ted Talk which allows the audience to be engage. His examples seems realistic and logical, for example: he talks about a woman who is working hard so that her son can attend university. Singer also uses a lighter tone in his Ted Talk which allows his argument to be more persuasive to the audience. However, his examples does not seems practical or realistic enough to grasp the audience attention. Instead, the examples pull the audience back because they do not understand what he is trying to emphasize or explain. Kuper believes that charity is limited, in order to help one we need to think about profit. He introduce the Gates Foundation and Micro Insurance Fund which are two organizations that allows one to see how profit works. He also believes that if one gives a small amount of his or her income every month consistently then it can make a huge difference. Kuper talks about the poor, but also those who are excluded. He concluded that giving also helps those who give (adding profit and external meaning). Kuper argument allows persons to make their own decision and give willing. In contrast, Singer talks about charity and donation has if those are the only solutions. He believes that the money we are spending on unnecessary things, like leisure should be given to charity. He also talks about effective altruism as a solution. He
The text explains that one is less interested in children in distant places. The text highlight the example of the child drowning in the pond to explain the contradiction of one’s moral reasoning. Like the dog, one feel responsible for one child not many children. One is best able to respond when dealing with a “single victim”. Thus, “mass suffering” would not get the attention it needs because there is too many people involved. That’s the reason why some people are not interesting in donating for poverty