ISSN 1948-5425
2013, Vol. 5, No. 4
Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in Scientific Texts: A
Hallidayan Perspective
Bahram Kazemian (Corresponding author)
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
E-mail: Bahram_kazemian@yahoo.com
Biook Behnam
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
E-mail: Behnam_biook@yahoo.com
Naser Ghafoori
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
E-mail: ghafoori@iaut.ac.ir
Received: August 8, 2013 doi:10.5296/ijl.v5i4.4192 Accepted: August 19, 2013
Published: August 28, 2013
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i4.4192
Abstract
Scientific Texts are generally concentrated on highly technical terms, and they are troublesome to understand due to their complexity in forms and meanings. Grammatical metaphor is divided into two broad areas: ideational and interpersonal. This paper focuses on the first type i.e. Ideational Grammatical Metaphor, which includes process types and nominalization. This paper adopts Hallidayan Systemic Functional Grammar to pinpoint and analyze nominalization and the role played by it. With a corpus of 10 authentic scientific texts drawn from very influential magazines, the analysis is conducted based on nominalization, its frequency and process types. The analysis displays that Ideational
Grammatical Metaphor has permeated scientific texts and the prevailing process types are material and relational types. Consequently, the tone of the writing is more abstract, technical and formal. Instances of IGM In scientific writing enable technicality and rationality. Based on the findings of this study, some implications can be drawn for academic and scientific
146
www.macrothink.org/ijl
International Journal of Linguistics
ISSN 1948-5425
2013, Vol. 5, No. 4
writing and reading as well as translators, students and instructors involved
References: Aronoff, A., & Miller, J. R. (2003). The handbook of linguistics. London: Blackwell Publishing Caffarel, A. (2006). A systemic functional grammar of French: From grammar to discourse. Cehan, A. (2004). Language metafunctions in classroom discourse. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 4, 265-272. Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum. Graber, P. L. (2001). Context in Text: A Systemic functional analysis of the Parable of the Sower Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1st ed.). London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. England: Oxford University Press. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science. Literacy and discourse power. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) Halliday, M. A. K., & Webster, J. J. (2009). Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics Knowles, M., & Moon, R. (2006). Introducing metaphor. New York: Routledge. Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. Murar, I. (2004). On grammatical metaphor. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 4, 167 Rose, D. (1997). Science, technology and technical literacies. [Online] Available: http://www.readingtolearn.com.au/images/pdf/Science_technology_and_technical_literacies. pdf (March 15, 2012). Taverniers, M. (2002). Systemic-functional linguistics and the notion of grammatical metaphor: A theoretical study and a proposal for a semiotic-functional integrative model. Taverniers, M. (2003). Grammatical metaphor in SFL: A historiography of the introduction and http://users.ugent.be/~mtaverni/publications.html (July 20, 2012). Taverniers, M. (2006). Grammatical metaphor and lexical metaphor: Different perspectives on semantic variation (June 25, 2012). Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold. Vandenbergen, S., Marie, A., Taverniers, M., & Ravelli, L. (2003).Grammatical Metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics Webster, J. J. (2003). On language and linguistics. London: Continuum. Webster, J. J. (2005 a). Studies in English language. London/New York: Continuum. Webster, J. J. (2005 b). Studies in Chinese language. University of Michigan: Continuum.