4/15/13
Brain theory vs Body theory
Ever since the human mind evolved enough to have a cognitive function above all other animals, we gained the gift (or burden) of self-awareness. With this blessing of self-awareness comes many advantages, but with one catch which is the question burning in all our minds, which is, who am I and how do I define my personal identity? There are two theories’ that attempt to answer this question the first of which is the Body theory, this theory states that your physical body is who you are and it’s how you know your identity. The brain theory suggests that you brain rather your mind defines your personality and identity. In my opinion the latter theory is correct, simply due to the simplicity of the body theory.
Basically the body theory suggests that you are your body and your body is how you define your personal identity. While at first glance this may seem like a probable correct answer to the personal identity question due to its simple and easy to understand nature, but it is riddled with flaws for a few reasons. The first of which is due to person stages and human biological process of continuously replacing its cells and molecules with new ones. For instance according to this theory the newborn stage of yourself is not the same person that you are today, because you are not comprised of the same exact molecules as you were when you were a newborn. Another critique of this theory is the limited affect that your physical body has on your identity. For example, while your body does identify a person physically, it does not consider the person personal identity in regards to personality.
The brain theory states that a person’s identity is solely represented by the individual’s brain/mind. This theory makes the most sense out of the two because it is not held down by the previously stated flaws of the body theory. For instance the brain theory takes into account person stages and acknowledges that just because an individual’s brain may change and add different molecules and cells over the course of a persons’ life it doesn’t mean it’s not their identity. A common critique of the brain theory is the brain transplant critique, which argues that if a person’s brain is put into another person’s body that that is not the same person. While that may make sense if you adhere to the body theory it fails to disprove the brain theory because according to the brain theory the brain is your sole identity and the body in which is contained in is irrelevant.
In conclusion the brain theory is the most plausible explanation to our personal identity question. Due to it suggesting in my opinion that the brain is your identity not because it solely defines you, rather because it is the only instrument available to you that allows you to continuously expand and store your ever changing and evolving personality.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Philosophers often say that it is important to find yourself, to identify who you are. But the self is not something one finds, it is something one creates through the process of change. The Encarta Dictionary: English (North America) defines identity as “the name or essential character that identifies somebody or something” (def.1). We all have sets of characteristics that we recognize as…
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
It could be argued that a person’s sense of personal identity depends on how they see…
- 2278 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Humans seem to be an entity made up by a combination of both physical properties and mental properties. Folk psychology of soul proposed by Bering (2006) suggested “common-sense mind-body dualism” is a cognitive adaptation that evolved through natural selection. According to this quote, it is believed that individual is fundamentally constituted of body, mind and volition. For centuries, people have tried to discover what makes an individual from philosophical, psychological and physiological perspectives. At different stages of this knowledge in understanding human beings, behaviourism, humanism and the study of consciousness will be critically evaluated in this discussion.…
- 892 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The accounts for personal identity, thought up by John Locke, were skeptical for several philosophers throughout time. Locke believes that we are the same person as we were yesterday because of our personal identity. He says that our personal identity is founded on consciousness namely, a continuity of conscious memories, but that the substance of the soul or body does not affect our personal identity. First, I will discuss what Locke believes to be a person. Second, I will explain why Locke believes personal identity has to be a continuous consciousness throughout time. Third, I will asses Thomas Reid's objection to Locke's account on personal identity and explain why I believe Reid's account is stronger.…
- 1152 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Entrenched in the “simple” view is the idea that personal identity, and the persistence of personal identity, cannot be measured through philosophical discourse or scientific investigation. There are a number of opposing arguments, known as complex theories of personal identity. In each of these arguments, the central claim is that either the body, the brain, or the psychological continuity of an individual determines how they persist as the same person (Garrett, 1998, p 52). To call them complex is a misnomer – for each is far too narrow to properly define and explain personal identity.…
- 1036 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Compare Browne and Nagel and give their arguments for why we should, or should not, be selfish. Give your own opinion and justify it.…
- 952 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This hence suggests that perhaps the solution to the question of personal identity lies somewhere between the body and the brain views – A conclusion of which can be better accommodated for by the scattered individual view rather than by the aforementioned…
- 586 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Ilana Moss (2009), “The mind is a tricky thing. Some say the mind is a result of electrical activity in the brain. Others believe the mind exists outside of the body and affects the brain, causing the electromagnetic activity that we can observe with technology. Either way, the mind is not something we can point to and say, "There it is"!” Dr. Candace Pert (Weiss, 2001) states that, “our bodies don 't exist to carry our heads around, any thinking has the whole body participating.” This means every aspect of thinking has our entire body included in the process. “Pert explains that each neuron in the human brain has hundreds of thousands of receptors. ‘Receptors are proteins, and these receptors literally vibrate and constantly change shape.’ She continues: ‘As more peptides were discovered in the brain, more were also found in other systems of the body. Therefore, the body-soul connection is actually physical. These receptors wax and wane depending on how much bombardment they get. They 're in a constant state of loud chatter.’" (Weiss, 2001).…
- 950 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Psychologist Erik Erikson defines identity as ‘a sense of continuity over time as a being or entity that is different from others’ (Clarke, 2009, Pg252). We all have our own identities that are different than the person stood next to us, but he believed that it doesn’t stay the same identity throughout a person’s lifetime. We all go through different stages during our lifetime; babies, childhood, adolescence, adulthood and then to old age – Each forging a new identity for us not only based on past experiences but on conflicts and experiences that challenge us in everyday life and the future.…
- 1397 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The self is: Fiske (2010) offers two definitions the conceptual definition, and the operational definition. The conceptual definition addresses the interpersonal self and the person’s collection of roles: student, swimmer (athlete), daughter, sister, friend, and psychology major (p. 179). A person’s true identity is not what he or she does but rather the identity of an individual is who he or she really is and how he or she fits into the community, society, and his or her place in the culture. A name does not make the person, but his or her characteristics give lead way to the truth of an individual. The operational definition explains how social psychologists measure the self (Fiske, 2010, pg. 179). This is achieved by looking at an individual’s…
- 1266 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
- understand that this is a debate regarding whether or not ethics is an objective or subjective discipline…
- 856 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Question: In dualism about the mind and body a more plausible view than the view that we are purely physical beings? Give reason for your answer.…
- 1476 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There has been a long-standing question in the world of philosophy on what determines one’s personal identity. Out of all the attributes that make up the individual, it seems difficult to decipher what actually makes up the personal identity. The most common choices to this question are the mind, the brain, the spirit, or the body. There has yet been no proof on which of these choices are actually correct but many individuals have sided with their one sole choice. Based on the different opinions presented in class this past week, I believe that the mind is solely responsible for the individual’s personal identity.…
- 702 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Identity is something human beings hold dear. Humans are very complex beings and it is difficult to pinpoint exactly what makes up who a person is or can be. Now, the most common generalizations as to what makes up an identity are: personality, likes, dislikes, experience(s), religion, soul, memories and beliefs. A physical form isn’t mentioned; because the body is a temporary thing. A body doesn’t necessarily mean that it is part of the identity since; what will last forever in not the body but the impact left by personality or ideas, for they are everlasting.…
- 792 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A number of further question need to be addressed if we take that our brain identity determines our personal identity. Between structural and functional identity one could argue that at the brain level can make a distinction. As new regions of the brain can become active and start performing the functions that previously process by the now-compromised parts. Structural damage does not always manifest itself functionally. Functional diseases of the brain like certain psychiatric diseases where cannot be pinned down to structural disorder. Foreign material to the brain would necessarily change the person’s identity. Our personal identity can be connected with the physiology. In this understanding of personal identity it is often utilized in justifying…
- 194 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays