Preview

Philosophy of Religion, Does God Exist?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1094 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy of Religion, Does God Exist?
The existence of God.

The question that millions of people ask themselves each day is does God exist?
What is God? Who is God? Throughout my life I have never questioned the existence of God; God just IS. However, there exists beings who need an explanation to how God can possibly exist as an eternal, all-powerful and all-knowing being. Through three different arguments, this paper examines some rational arguments for the existence of and eternal being, God. The first argument states that if something exist, then it has existed from eternity. Something cannot come from nothing, therefore something has to exist. If God exist He is an eternal being. God is something, therefore God must exist. God has to be an eternal being because he is the greatest conceivable being. Therefore, the premise must be that as an eternal being God exists, and his existence is accounted for. His existence does not depend on either a cause nor on mere chance. Then, if God exists, He is his own existence; meaning He cannot come into existence and he cannot cease to exist. Therefore, If God does exist, He cannot cause or destroy his own existence, which makes it necessary for God to exist. Now, either God exists or it is impossible that God exists. God is something; something does in fact exist. It certainly is not impossible that god exists. Therefore, it is necessary for God to exist. Therefore, God exists. The second argument says if some being exists, it can be dependent or independent on another being. Dependent beings exist; therefore, independent being must also exist. if all being were dependent then beings would be infinite and the answer to how beings started would still be unanswered. We have already concluded that God is an eternal being whose existence cannot be caused or cease to exist, then God is the ultimate source of all powers. God is an independent being. Because God is the ultimate source above all other beings, then this being is also the ultimate source
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Examine the ways in which the design argument provides evidence for the existence of God
    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examine the ways in which the design argument provides evidence for the existence of God

    One argument for the existence of God is the basic design argument. It states that: the world has purpose and order, the complexity of the universe shows evidence of design, such design needs a designer, the only designer of something as great as the universe is God. This provides evidence for the existence of God as natural objects, such as the human eye, are so complex that the chance of them occurring randomly are so minute that it is much more likely that the eye had a designer. This is because each individual part of the eye must be the exact right size and in a specific condition to be able to function at all. A designer who is capable of designing something so detailed must be omnipotent – no question. The only possible being who is able to create something so divine must be God. Therefore the Basic argument shows evidence for the existence of God.…

    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    phi105 Wk1 Open Book Philosophy Quiz 1
    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    phi105 Wk1 Open Book Philosophy Quiz 1

    I believe A and C are arguments more than B because both these statements say that God does exist and he created the Universe. Also these statements are open to different points of view and opinions.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According To Douglas Gasking's Arguments Against The Existence Of God
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According To Douglas Gasking's Arguments Against The Existence Of God

    So this argument is not good against the God existence. There are also some problems about the words used in this argument like- marvellous, incredible, formidable, merit etc. He should use words like greatness, greatest etc. We can give the example- let us take the premise 1 and use greatest in place of marvellous. World is the greatest achievement imaginable is more plausible than world is the marvellous achievement imaginable.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake

    The premises of the argument, can be restructured to say that premise one claimes that “There exists an order of causes. The second premise states that “This order of causes can not go in a circle”. The third premise asserts that “This order cannot go on forever” The fourth premise infers that if the first three premises are true, then that concludes that “There must be a first cause in the order of causes. This cause is what “everyone calls God”. Consequently “There is a first cause in the order of causes, which everyone calls God.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    to what extent is the cosmological argument a weak argument
    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    to what extent is the cosmological argument a weak argument

    All expect the contingency theory, another argument by Thomas Aquinas. This argument states that everything in our universe is contingent (does not have to necessarily exist) so if everything was contingent then at some time there would have been nothing and therefore there would be nothing, but there clearly is, so therefore there must be something which isn’t contingent which everything else depends on, a necessary being, this is God.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay

    The Ontological Argument (Question 1 part a and b) According to the Ontological Argument, the existence of God can be proven by merely appealing to the…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summarize Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summarize Anselm's Ontological Argument

    (96.) Premises which lead us to the conclusion about existence of God through his argument is defining God as a maximal perfection. Therefore it is impossible to conceive either that there is anything greater than God or possibility to imagine God being better than he already is. The Ontological Argument claims that the…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Part B. the Ontological Argument Is a Convincing Argument. Discuss
    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Part B. the Ontological Argument Is a Convincing Argument. Discuss

    These points, although confusing at first are relatively simple, the first statement simply means that God is the most perfect being imaginable and nothing is greater. Anslem then goes on to point out to be the greatest creature imaginable, God must exist. Finally to conclude his argument Anslem says that only the fool says there is no God. This is again very logical, and therefore convincing because Anslem is simply saying that something that exists in reality is greater that something limited to the mind, God is the greatest therefore only an idiot would say that God does not exist.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ontological Argument Analysis

    This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Why People Do Not Exist
    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Why People Do Not Exist

    I think this is a significant objection because it is very hard to prove that God did create the universe, because if he did, some people may question who or what first cause created him. Also, even though the Cosmological Argument states that there is a first cause for everything that exists, there is no way to prove that the first cause is omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent, this being said, because there is no way to prove that, the creator of the universe is omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent. If the creator of the universe is not omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent, the creator of the universe cannot be God. People also may question if it was an intelligent designer who created the universe. This is an example of Intelligent Design Creationism.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophical Arguments For The Existence Of God
    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophical Arguments For The Existence Of God

    Evaluate the arguments for the existence of god There are three main philosophical arguments for the existence of god; the Teleological argument (also known as the design argument), made by William Paley, which presents the central idea that the universe is so complex, perfectly designed and purposeful that it must have had an intelligent designer, the Cosmological argument, made by Thomas Aquinas, which is based on the main idea that everything has a starting point so an uncaused god must have made/caused the universe, and the (entirely a priori) Ontological argument, made by Anselm, based on the main idea that god is perfect, and that existence is a predicate of perfection so therefore God must be real both in our minds and reality as he…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes Deductive Proofs For God
    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Descartes Deductive Proofs For God

    The Problems with Descartes Deductive Proofs for God Descartes “Meditations of First Philosophy” put forward two arguments for the existence of God, both of which are a priori. These arguments are the Trademark argument and the Ontological argument. I shall be describing these arguments then demonstrating that they are unsatisfying in proving God’s existence. To do this I shall be discussing criticisms put forward in response to both the Trademark and Ontological arguments. These criticisms I shall be discussing are the Cartesian Circle, the origin of all ideas from experience and the problem of omnipotence and evil.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument Essay
    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cosmological Argument Essay

    There are two basic foundations of these arguments, and the simplest way to think of them might be the "vertical" and the "horizontal." These names indicate the direction from which the causes come. In the vertical form, it is argued that every created thing is being caused right now. The horizontal version shows that creation had to have a cause in the…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Existence Of God
    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Existence Of God

    First of all, we must ask: is the existence of God an analytic statement, or is it synthetic. An analytic statement is one which is impossible to think of as false. For example, a triangle having three internal angles which total 180 degrees is an analytic statement because it it impossible to think of a triangle in any other way. This therefore means that the proposition is logically necessary and it would be incoherent to be considered to be false.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics