Preview

Summarize Anselm's Ontological Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
477 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summarize Anselm's Ontological Argument
Anselm considers that, raising against Ontological Argument from side of creature(human) that was created by creator(God) is absurd, however personally I am not the only one who disagrees with this statement. First of all I will summarize Anselm’s Ontological Argument, than I will go on to object to his argument through Immanuel Kant’s argument and defend Immanuel Kant's argument threw the Anselm's and Rowe's arguments.
The formation of Ontological Argument started in eleventh century by St.Anselm of Canterbury, in his famous ontological argument. Anselm begins by defining God as being “than which nothing greater can be conceived”. (96.) Premises which lead us to the conclusion about existence of God through his argument is defining God as a maximal perfection. Therefore it is impossible to conceive either that there is anything greater than God or possibility to imagine God being better than he already is. The Ontological Argument claims that the …show more content…
So God exist in the understanding’’. (pg#) Therefore if one have a faithful understanding of what God essentially is, one must believe that God exists. However Anselm does not provide a penultimate step for understanding the concept of god, indeed the point of understanding is lost.
Anselm substantiates the existence of God simply from considering the concept or definition of God, additionally there are many words that has actual definition as Santa Claus or Fairy, but the existence of them are not guaranteed and proved by only understanding the concept and acknowledging the definition of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    • Explain Anselm's Ontological Argument (25 Marks)
    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • Explain Anselm's Ontological Argument (25 Marks)

    Anselm put forward his ideas about the existence of God through his book, the Proslogion. He started by simply giving the word ‘God’ a definition, and then explaining that to not believe in God was absurd. The Proslogion consisted of two main parts. In Proslogion 1, Anselm explained God as being…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument

    in the understanding, God must exist in reality as well as in the understanding. "No one who…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Does God Exist? Considering the Philosophy of Ernest Nagel from a First Person
    • 1537 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Does God Exist? Considering the Philosophy of Ernest Nagel from a First Person

    One burning and enduring problem in philosophy to which we have given considerable examination is the question of the existence of God--the superlative being that philosophers have defined and dealt with for centuries. After reading the classic arguments of St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas, the contentious assertions of Ernest Nagel, and the compelling eyewitness accounts of Julian of Norwich, I have been introduced to some of the most revered and referenced arguments for and against God's existence that have been put into text. All of them are well-thought and well-articulated arguments, but they have their holes. The question of God's true existence, therefore, is still not definitively answered and put to rest; the intensity of this debate probably never will mitigate. Many theologians and academics honestly admit that no matter what any philosopher may assert regarding this topic, whether or not a certain person believes in God's existence is a question of faith and nothing more.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On Behalf Of The Fool By Gaunilo
    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On Behalf Of The Fool By Gaunilo

    The key idea of the Ontological argument is that God exits in reality as well as in the understanding. Anselm’s first premise states that God exists in the understanding. The second premise states that God might have existed in reality. If something exits only in understanding and might have existed in reality, then it might have been greater than it is as stated in the third premise. If God can only exist as an idea in the mind, then we can imagine something greater than God. But we cannot imagine something that is greater than God. Therefore, God exists.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The weaknesses of the Ontological argument give support to Atheism. Discuss this statement
    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The weaknesses of the Ontological argument give support to Atheism. Discuss this statement

    Anselm’s ontological argument described in part (a), was refuted in his own lifetime, by Gaunilo, who demonstrated in a reduction ad absurdum of his own, that if the logic of the argument were applied to things other than God, it led to invalid conclusions. Gaunilo didn’t identify any specific fault with the argument, but argued that something must be wrong with it, because if there wasn’t anything wrong, then we can use its logic to prove anything, which we may have no reason to believe to be true.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examine the Key Concepts of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examine the Key Concepts of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God

    The ontological argument rests on the premise that the universe’s existence is contingent- it depends on something else to exist. The argument is deductive, analytic and a priori, and was first formed by St. Anselm, who prayed for a short argument that would prove God to be “that than which nothing greater can be conceived”. This prayer was called the proslogion and tried to prove God by means of reductio ad absurdum, which states that the existence of God is logically necessary. The argument is based on the word “God”, a being that possesses all perfections, therefore must exist. Anselm was aware that the existence of God is denied by atheists and in response to this, he states “the fool has said in his heart there is no God”.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anselm Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anselm Ontological Argument Analysis

    Anselm is not trying to say that whatever one can think of exist because, everyone can think of something that does not exist. Neither is he trying to saying believing in something without any doubt makes it exist. Finally Anselm might believe in God, he is not trying to convince us that God exist but rather he is trying to show us that once one understands or grasp the concept of who or what God, then based on logic it follows that God has to exist. Anselm ontological argument follows that if one makes an assumption and can show things that follow from that assumption lead to contradiction, then the initial assumption is rejected and conclude the opposite…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Logic Cannot Prove the Existence of God
    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Logic Cannot Prove the Existence of God

    For Anselm, using logic that can be deducted about God, it is clear to see that God’s existence is necessary. In the second ontological argument from Anselm, God is the greatest being possible; it is greater to exist by necessity than by contingence, it is therefore, impossible for God to not exist. In this argument, God’s existence is an analytic statement, it is impossible to prove that God exists and although Anselm believes that it does not need to be proven, there is no way of knowing that it is analytic. For example take triangles, every triangle that anyone can ever think of will have 3 sides that all add up to 180 degrees, that is simply a part of what a triangle is. Humans can however, prove this by drawing every possible triangle and testing them to see, with God’s existence that is not possible. For humans to consider his existence as an analytic statement, they would have to go faith and logic alone. In a way God’s existence could be a synthetic statement, which would mean that it would need to proven before the statement was true or not, the reason for this is because whether God exists or not does not prove his existence in reality as Anselm suggests in his argument. Kant would agree with this as he reviews Anselm’s ontological argument by saying that God’s existence is not a predicate, existence may be a part of the concept of God, but it does not proof that God exists.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anselm's Ontological Argument

    Anselm’s argument did lead to objections as most do. The first was that of a Monk Named Gaunilo, who argued against Anselm’s ontological Argument with the use of the concept of a perfect island. Gaunilo argued that concept of a perfect island does not prove that the existence of an island. In this case that perfection does not imply ‘existence’. Gaunilo claims that if the word God was replaced with the words perfect island, then Anselm’s ontological argument would not conclude that the perfect island exists. The fact Gaunilo was trying to bring across that a valid argument can never have true premises and a false conclusion, as the conclusion has to follow logically from the premises. Constructing a similar argument in which the conclusion is false shows that Anselm’s argument is flawed. Gaulino’s argument follows the basic form as such:…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Anselm's ontological argument.
    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Anselm's ontological argument.

    Anselm’s first argument is based on three premises followed by a conclusion. The first premise is that God is the greatest conceivable being. For someone to say ‘there is no God they must first have conceived an idea of what God is and Anselm suggests that god is usually conceived as the ‘greatest conceivable being’. He then followed this with the premise that God exists either in the mind alone or in the mind and reality as well. His third premise is that that which exists in the mind and in reality is greater than that which exists in the mind alone. For example unicorns may exist in the mind as a great concept but anything that exists in reality would be greater than the concept of the unicorn. Anselm therefore states that an idea that exists in the mind and reality has an extra quality in comparison to the idea that exists in the mind alone, this quality being existence. From this he therefore concludes that god must exist in reality as well as the mind because he is the greatest conceivable being.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay

    In Saint Anselm and Gaunilo’s “The Ontological Argument”, Anselm believes that God is the greatest of all conceivable things and nothing else can be ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain Anselms Ontological Argument
    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Anselms Ontological Argument

    Hence, Anselm states that God exists in the mind, even the mind of those who deny His existence. However he points out that it is greater to exist in reality and in the mind than in the mind alone. Take for example; a pile of notes worth £1000. If it exists in the mind it is merely a pleasant thought, however, if it exists in reality it can be spent and is greater. Since God is the greatest conceivable being, He must exist in reality and in the mind, because to think otherwise involves contradiction of the theory, which you agree with.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay
    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay

    The first line in Anselms ontological argument is “the fool says in his heart there is no god”, from this Anselm can deduce that the fool has an understanding of what god is .The fool has to admit that god is that than which nothing greater can be conceived, as this is the definition of god and is understood by believers and non-believers. Anselm then goes on to say, it is one thing to exist in the mind alone and another to exist in the mind and reality, for example a piece of art can exist in an artist’s mind but it is not until they paint it that it exists in the mind and reality. Anselm views God as ‘that than which none greater can be conceived’. From this definition we can say that god exists in the mind as the greatest conceivable…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Gaunilo's Perfect Island Argument
    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gaunilo's Perfect Island Argument

    The concept of God is uncertain in that there are no other beings in which one can even begin try to conceive parallels or even sub-parallels; it is impossible to hypothesise such grand God when there is nothing comparable. This supports Anselm’s argument in that it substantiates that God is unimaginable and so inconceivably great. Gaunilo’s argument works in showing…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Refutes Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Refutes Anselm's Ontological Argument

    Nothing that is distinctly conceivable implies a contradiction. Consequently there is no being whose existence is demonstrable” (Palmer, 161). Hume believes the Anselm’s ontological argument went from concrete and pure definition to a statement of fact that is all based on reality if anything happened. Hume believes the argument is invalid based on the transition from definition to statement. Along with Hume’s criticism of Anselm’s argument, Immanuel Kant also states, “If, then, I take the subject (God) with all its predicates (including that of almightiness) and say, God is, or there is a God, I do not ascribe a new predicate to the concept of God, but I only posit the subject itself […]” (Palmer, 161-162).…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics