Preview

Piety In Plato's Euthyphro

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
397 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Piety In Plato's Euthyphro
In Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates questions Euthyphro, a religious expert, who he runs into outside of a courthouse in Athens. Socrates was being indicted on the charges of corrupting the youth, and Euthyphro was prosecuting his own father for murder. Socrates was bewildered as to why Euthyphro would indict his own blood of a crime. In an attempt to explain to Socrates why it was the right thing to do, Euthyphro proclaims that he is acting piously by taking his father to court. Euthyphro adds that his relatives are mad at him because “it is impious for a son to prosecute his father for murder. But their ideas of the divine attitude to piety and impiety are wrong” (4e). Because of this, Socrates enquires about what Euthyphro believes piety truly is, to which he provides his four definitions that Socrates ultimately disagrees with. The first attempt in defining piety is when Euthyphro says, “I say that the pious is to do what I am doing now, to prosecute the wrongdoer…. whether the wrongdoer is your father or your mother or anyone else” (5e). He then goes on to explaining that it is impious not to prosecute to which Socrates replies, “you did not teach me adequately when I asked you what pious was, but you told me what you are doing now, in prosecuting your father for …show more content…
This time, Euthyphro says that “what is dear to the gods is pious, what is not is impious” (7a). With this response comes a slight sense of understanding from Socrates who still counteracts by saying, “…the gods are in a state of discord, that they are at odds with each other…and that they are at enmity with each other” (7b). This being said, the gods are opposed to each other and do not agree. This goes to show the contradiction that Euthyphro poses in his argument. According to his logic, it would seem as if some acts were both pious and impious, but these two things are quite the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This reading is so confusing, I read it three times and still have some confusion about the Socrates statements. Basically, it is a conversation or arguments between Socrates and Euthyphro. Socrates is in the court because a man whose name is Meletus prosecuted him about corrupting the youth. Therefore, Euthyphro is in the court to prosecute his father for the murder of the servant. It is not proven that his father is killer but Euthyphro is trying to get justice on behalf of the servant. Euthyphro thinks that a person has to pay if he/she does something impiety. Euthyphro explains that piety is something the dear to god and impiety is the thing that you do and god does not like. Euthyphro is trying to explain Socrates that he has knowledge…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meno's Paradox

    • 1703 Words
    • 5 Pages

    At Euthyphro 9e, Euthyphro claims that the pious is that which is loved by all the gods. In effect, he is claiming that the pious and the god-loved are identical. In reply to this claim, Socrates argues that “If the god-loved and the pious were the same, my dear Euthyphro, then if the pious was being loved because it was pious, the god-loved would also be being loved because it is god-loved.” Socrates is essentially arguing that if the ‘pious’ and the ‘god-loved’ are, in fact, identical, you should be able to use the terms interchangeably without changing the truth value of a particular statement.…

    • 1703 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To better clarify his question, Socrates makes an analogy; “a thing is not seen because it is visible, but conversely visible because it is seen” (15). Socrates later makes a distinction between being approved and getting approved; something is being approved because it gets approved, not the other way around. According to Euthyphro, something gets approved by the gods because it is holy and not the other way around; it is not holy because it gets approved by the gods. Furthermore, because it gets approved it is being approved, therefore it is something that is approved by the gods. Nonetheless, from this you can distinguish, that what is holy is something different from what is approved of by the gods. Something holy gets approved because it is holy, and something that is being approved by the gods is being approved of because it gets approved. If what is being approved of by the gods were the same thing as what is holy, and if what is holy gets approved because it is holy, then what is being approved of by the gods would get approved because it is being approved of, when in fact the opposite is true. On the other hand, if we accept that what is being approved of is being approved of because it gets approved, then the holy, too, would have to…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates looks to the priest to tell him what exactly is pious so that he may educate himself as to why he would be perceived as impious. Found in the Apology, another of Plato's Five Dialogues, Socrates aims to defend his principles to the five hundred and one person jury. Finally, the Crito, an account of Socrates' final discussion with his good friend Crito, Socrates is offered an opportunity to escape the prison and his death sentence. As is known, Socrates rejected the suggestion. It is in the Euthyphro and the Apology that it can be deduced that Socrates is not guilty as charged, he had done nothing wrong and he properly defended himself. However, in the Crito, it is shown that Socrates is guilty only in the interpretation and enforcement of Athens' laws through the court system and its jurors. Socrates' accusations of being blasphemous are also seen as…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an analysis of Plato’s Euthyphro, Peter Geach claims that Socrates commits the Socratic fallacy when he refuses Euthyphro’s first definition of piety. Socrates rejects the definition given because it does not give a formal definition of what piety is, but instead offers examples of things and actions that are pious. Geach believes that this is a substantial fallacy committed by Socrates, one that may prevent him from getting at the truth of the matter. I will first expand on Geach’s Socratic fallacy, as well as explain why this fallacy presents itself as a problem for Geach. Then I will examine Euthyphro to see if Geach is correct in assuming that Socrates commits the Socratic fallacy. In addition to Euthyphro, I will look at another one…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Republic begins with a debate on the subject of morality. One by one, Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymachus put forth their definitions of morality and one by one, they come up short. None survive the merciless scrutiny of the author’s mentor, Socrates.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Piety, says Euthyphro, is what all the gods love, and the impious is what all the gods hate. Socrates is not satisfied by this definition, either, and so he tries a different tack to extract a definition from Euthyphro. Socrates does this by asking: “Is the pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods?” When Euthyphro seems unsure, Socrates simplifies his question with an analogy. He asks Euthyphro if something is “carried” because it is “a thing carried,” or if it is “carried” because something is carrying it. Both men agree that the action confers the state of being. That is, a thing loved is so because someone loves it, and the thing itself is not creating a state of “loving” within the people around it. Likewise, being loved is not a state inherent to the thing loved, but is the result of the love others bear for the thing. Moving from his analogy back to Euthyphro’s definition, Socrates shows the fallacy in Euthyphro’s statement. Being god-loved cannot confer piety, as it confers “god-loved-ness” instead. Therefore, in Euthyphro’s statement, all the gods loving something would make that thing universally god-loved, but in no way makes it pious. An act is loved by the gods because it is pious, and not the other way…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    that goes by Meletos, who had plans of indicting the philosopher following the claim that he’d been corrupting the youth.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthyphro- Plato

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the writing called Euthyphro by Plato, Socrates is being charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in all of the Gods. He is being accused of this by a man named Meletus who feels as though he is guilty of not believing in the Gods of the states. Not only does he not believe in the Gods but he is accused of making up new ones. The crimes that he is being charged with go hand in hand with each other but he maintains his innocence because he feels he isn’t guilty. While on the other hand Euthyphro is prosecuting his father and indicting him for murder. Morally Euthyphro feels as though it’s the right thing to do and his family doesn’t agree only because it’s his father. In this essay I will summarize the dialogue and its message relating to piety/holiness.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Euthyphro Dilemma

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Religion and morality have been seen as inseparable since the advent of Western thought (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-morality/) - religion's fundamental characters being frequently ethical in nature, and morality often viewed as a derivative of religion. However, the relationship is not as clear cut as many people would like you to believe. A very old and important dilemma facing this relationship is the Euthyphro dilemma, discussed in Plato’s Euthyphro. In it, Socrates and Euthyphro argue about the nature of morality outside of a court. Socrates is being prosecuted for impiety, while Euthyphro is charging his father with murder. Although charging your father, even for murder, is frowned upon in Ancient Greek culture, Euthyphro justifies it by claiming that this is similar to what the Gods have been reported to have done, and therefore it is alright. After multiple definitions of holiness and piety, Socrates brings up the Euthyphro dilemma , which when adapted to a monotheistic context where God is an all-powerful, all-knowing being (which I will be using), goes:…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The primary philosophical issue Euthyphro and Socrates disagree on is “what is holy and what is not holy” p7, 5c11-d2. Socrates extracts Euthyphro’s thoughts on what the definition of holy verse unholy is in an attempt to use them in his own trial, and later to show Euthyphro that his ideology is flawed. Socrates takes the side of essential knowledge (the nature of something). Euthyphro takes the side of particular knowledge (the characteristics of knowledge). Euthyphro says “I’d say the holy is just what I’m doing now: prosecuting wrongdoers, whether in cases of murder or temple-robbery, or those guilty of any other such offense, be they one’s father or mother or anyone else whatever; and failing to prosecute is unholy” p7, 5d10-e3. Euthyphro believes it his duty to be a voice for the man that has died because no one else will do the morally correct action. Socrates says “Then don’t you realize that now you’re equating holy with what the gods love” p15, c7-8. Socrates unfolds a long and twisting sequence of questions to try and find out what the exact definition of holy is from Euthyphro. Socrates questions Euthyphro because Euthyphro claims to be an expert on religion.…

    • 665 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Piety Analysis

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly, I believe all life, ever created, to included humans, was created with a specific purpose and morals engrained into our essence, even though we lack the knowledge or comprehension of God. To be sure many men like Socrates made every effort to discover the origin of humans morality, even questioning a fellow Athenian Euthyphro. Paying with his life, Socrates embarked on a mission to question beliefs, and during this time he question Euthyphro about his expertise with "piety" and "impiety." As Euthyphro claimed his morality was something he gained from the god’s definition of piety, and was prosecuting his father for accidentally murdering a servant, but Socrates argues that even the gods are inconsistent. Socrates was being charged…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle and Piety

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Euthyphro is a much studied text of Plato’s, which unfortunately has left many people with some very serious questions. Primarily, why does the Euthyphro…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the prominent concepts discussed in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics is that of the ultimate good. Aristotle rationally philosophizes that "every action and choice […] aims at some good" and that this ultimate good is generally considered to be happiness (3). However, Aristotle makes it clear that happiness is a very subjective concept and that the connotations of the word are a topic of constant debate.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Piety is doing as I am doing: that is to say, prosecuting anyone who is guilty of murder, sacrilege, or of any similar crime—whether he be your father or mother, or whoever he may be—that makes no difference; and not to prosecute them is impiety. The next definition, ‘Piety is that which is lived of the gods,’ is shipwrecked on a refined distinction between the state and the act, corresponding respectively to the adjective and the participle, or rather perhaps to the participle and the verb. The third and last definition, ‘Piety is a part of justice’ and “Piety is what is dear to the gods, and impiety is what is not dear to them.’ Socrates hardly sees the first explanation as a true definition. The second appears to him as to be part of justice which attends to the gods, as there is the other part of justice which attends to men. Piety or holiness is preceded by the act of being pious, not by the act of being loves; and therefore piety and the state of being loved are different. Euthyphro is simply saying that piety and holiness is learning how to please the…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays