Preview

Socrates 'Dishonesty In Plato's Euthyphro'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
773 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates 'Dishonesty In Plato's Euthyphro'
In Plato’s “Euthyphro”, Socrates has a conversation with Euthyphro about a young man that goes by Meletos, who had plans of indicting the philosopher following the claim that he’d been corrupting the youth. In what sounds like a hellacious situation to be part of, Socrates remains optimistic when he says, “And he alone seems to be starting out in politics correctly, because the correct way is to first pay attention to how our young people will be the best possible, just as a good farmer probably cares first for his young plants, and after this to the others as well.” (page 1) This displays optimism because he steers away from the standard reaction that the average person would have, and instead takes a route that is far more tranquil and unflustered. It remains clear that remaining positive is just as …show more content…
He delves into very distinctive reasoning as to why it will be difficult for him to talk amongst the others in the room, claiming that it is because he’s never been in any situation in which he’d have to speak in front of the court. I personally believe it goes without saying that honesty is a key personality trait for people to have, be it in modern day society or decades ago. Though sometimes the truth may not always be the most audibly pleasing thing for a person to hear, and at times the whitest of lies may always seem the easiest of ways to get by, honesty is and always will be the more viable option.
In Plato's "Crito", another personality trait that Socrates displays is a sense of self-infatuation. In his discussion with Crito, they gloss over the escape plan they have arranged so that Socrates cans sneakily make his exit from prison. When delving into the worst-case scenarios that can play out, Socrates asks, " Is it fair enough that one should not value every human opinion but only some and not others? And not the opinions of everyone but of some and not others? What do you say? Isn’t this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The teachings of Socrates in Plato’s The Five Dialogues provide an answer to the dilemma of the portly fella. The book of Crito portrays the scene of Socrates in his jail cell awaiting execution when he’s approached by an old friend, Crito, a philosopher and nobleman with sufficient funds to help Socrates escape from his prison cell. Crito repeatedly argues with Socrates in an attempt to convince him to flee his cell. The first argument that Crito presents is his argument of reputation in which he states, “Surely there can be no worse reputation than to value money more highly than one’s friends, for the majority will not believe that you yourself were not willing to leave prison while we were eager for you to do so.” Crito is essentially saying that that people will think that Crito chose his money over saving Socrates to which Socrates simply rebuts, “My good Crito, why should we care so much for what the majority think? The most reasonable people, to whom one should pay more attention, will believe that things were done as they were done” (Plato, Five Dialogues; Crito: pg. 47). Effectively Socrates is saying that Crito shouldn’t concern himself with the majority but with the reasonable because the reasonable see it the way it is. Crito then responds saying that the majority has the power to inflict the greatest evils, which in this case is death for Socrates, “You see Socrates, that one must also pay attention to the opinion of the majority. Your present situation makes clear that the majority can inflict not the least but pretty well the greatest evils if one is slandered among them” (Plato, Five Dialogues; Crito: pg. 47). In the portly fella case, you must be reasonable, and the reasonable thing is to not push the portly fella onto the tracks. A reasonable person wouldn’t even think to murder somebody in order save others, especially when you share no association with the other…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the reading Euthyphro, it is an argument between Euthyphro (the priest) and Socrates (who is being indicted by another man). This reading is a dialogue between the two men arguing on the same topic, even though they each gave examples, they still can’t figure out the answer but going “around and around” with the original question. Since Euthyphro and Socrates gave a lot of examples during the argument, I was really confused when reading it. I couldn’t organize my thoughts on the reading. However with the example of Euthyphro persecuting his own father for “murdering” a drunk murder, I start to have an idea of what they are arguing about, in my opinion, it is a question with no right answer for. No matter which answer was given, the result…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates questions Euthyphro, a religious expert, who he runs into outside of a courthouse in Athens. Socrates was being indicted on the charges of corrupting the youth, and Euthyphro was prosecuting his own father for murder. Socrates was bewildered as to why Euthyphro would indict his own blood of a crime. In an attempt to explain to Socrates why it was the right thing to do, Euthyphro proclaims that he is acting piously by taking his father to court. Euthyphro adds that his relatives are mad at him because “it is impious for a son to prosecute his father for murder. But their ideas of the divine attitude to piety and impiety are wrong” (4e). Because of this, Socrates enquires about what Euthyphro believes piety truly is, to which he provides his four definitions that Socrates ultimately disagrees with.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Euthyphro unexpectedly run into each other outside of the Athens courthouse. Euthyphro went to the courthouse to prosecute his father for killing one of his servants, who was a murderer. Socrates was summoned to court to be charged with disturbing the youth. After Euthyphro stated his business at the courthouse, Socrates assumes that he must be a religious expert if he is willing to prosecute his own father on such a serious charge. Euthyphro then agrees with Socrates that he does indeed know all there is to know about what is holy. Socrates asks Euthyphro to teach him what holiness is, in hope that it will help with his trial.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's "Crito" is a dialogue between Socrates and one of his closest friends Crito. The entire dialogue takes place in Socrates prison cell, where he awaits execution. Crito visits Socrates before dawn in order to persuade him to escape from prison and flee to another city or country. Crito has made all the necessary arrangements to smuggle Socrates out of prison to safety. To Crito's despair Socrates seems quite willing to accept his execution, and so Crito presents as many arguments as he can to persuade Socrates to escape. Socrates manages through a logical thinking process to demount all of Crito's arguments for escaping the prison.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crito

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crito offers Socrates to escape prison and run away to another city, because he says it will be painful for him to lose such a good friend this way and that there are many people waiting to help, and also that they will be disappointed if he didn’t escape. Socrates says he is worried that if he escapes Crito and his companions will be in danger. Crito says it is easy to bribe them because he and his friends have enough money.…

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the reading Euthyphro, Plato’s end goal is to show that there is no rational relationship between “the pious” and “to be loved by the Gods.” The point of Socrates argument is that he is ultimately asking Euthyphro to explain piety by questioning the characteristics of something that is loved. Is something loved because it is good, is it loved because it is popular, what makes something loved?…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates lived a life of inquiry in order to achieve a fulfilled life of eudaimonia and success. I argue that the Socratic examined life is a process, which should be valued because it teaches one to be critical thinkers, and aids us in the understanding our true actions.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prodigious 16th President of the United States of America, Abraham Lincoln, once said “I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong.” (Lincoln) Such insight can be firmly applied to the dialogue Apology by Plato, in which Socrates offers his argument that he should be penalized by being fed at the Prytaneum. Socrates, a man of substantial intuition, wisdom, and insight, however disliked by the wealthier majority (for apparently corrupting the youth and others by asking questions to the upper class and spreading wisdom), doesn’t hold anything…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    • 1. In the Apology, Socrates recounts how he disobeyed the unjust order of the Thirty Tyrants to arrest a fellow citizen; he also claims that he will never stop philosophizing, regardless of what the legally constituted political authority commands. Yet, in the Crito, Socrates provides numerous arguments for obeying the decision of the legally constituted political authority, even though the decision (to put Socrates to death) was unjust. Critically assess whether Socrates’s view about political obligation in the two texts is consistent.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to reconcile these two seemingly contradictory claims, we must first understand who, according to Socrates, can be considered a true champion of justice, and what he considers to be ‘the true art of politics’.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    24c, of Apology, written by Plato about Socrates’ trial, starts off with Meletus accusing Socrates of corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates claims that if either of them is doing wrong it is Meletus because he involves himself in things that he does not really interested in or cares about. Socrates proves that Meletus is not concerned about the youth and also that he himslef is not a corrupter of the youth by asking Meletus a number of questions along with questions he answers himself. First he asks who would be the good influence for the youth, since he is considered to be the only corrupter. Meletus has no answer, to which Socrates replies “Do you see, Meletus, that you are silent and cannot tell? And yet does it not seem to you disgraceful and a sufficient proof of what I say, that you have never cared about it?” (24d). Socrates proves that Meletus has not even given thought to his accusations and to the youth in general. Socrates continues to ask for an answer and Meletus claims the laws make the youth better, but Socrates does not accept this answer because he asked who makes them better not what. Meletus claims that the judges, senators, and assemblymen all improve the youth of Athens, implying that Socrates is the only person of corruption to the youth. So…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What will they think if Socrates is not in charge of his kids? Socrates contends that the conclusion of a specialist is more essential than the sentiment of the dominant part. He gives the sample of somebody in preparing. Such a man does not pay consideration on the counsel of the overall population, however to his coach. In the event that he listened to popular assessment (take steroids, eat whatever you need, train 20 hours a day), he could hurt his body. Socrates extends the relationship to settling on what the right route is to act. On the off chance that we listen to the larger part instead of specialists we could hurt our souls, the some portion of us that is mangled by wrong activities and profited by right ones(Crito, 47a-48a). Socrates concedes that as a greater part, the overall population has the ability to kill individuals, yet he expresses that the most essential thing is not living, but rather carrying on with a decent life, so it is not worth after the assessment of the dominant part in the event that it means relinquishing something that is critical for living a decent life.(48b) . The above is one of Socrates' most key standards - that the truly critical thing is not to live but rather to live well. Thusly he considers whether it is ethically right to pay off the watchmen and escape. Socrates starts considering so as to tend to this issue the results for the city of Athens. He says that the laws and the city could be crushed on the off chance that he got away. Lawful judgments could lose their power in the event that they were invalidated by private nationals, and a city without laws would not stay in place for…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the world’s nations are in quite similar situation that the one Athens was in Socrates’s times. That is, that “skepticism and success” were the norm in those days. The Sophist stated, “All values and standards are relative,” and one of the main questions that you should ask yourself is, “Will performing this action be advantageous to me?” These are the criterion the many individuals, including presidents, follow these days. As a result, we have extremely corrupt individuals as presidents all over the globe. Having stated this point, now let’s analyze in general, what is a good president on Socrates’s norms?…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays