The passages present a debate about arguments concerning whether or not reusable bags should be put into mandatory use. This is an important debate because of the potential impact that it will have on both the environment and small business owners. The two positions argue whether or not stores should be made to use reusable bags. Both viewpoints have valid claims warranting consideration. For example, evidence suggests that reusable bags will be too expensive for small shop owners to afford. In contrast, opposing evidence suggests reusable bags are very inexpensive, costing only a dollar or two. While both sides of the issue have valid points, the viewpoint that reusable bags should be in put into mandatory use is the best-supported position, the position supported by the preponderance of the evidence cited in the passages. The strongest and best reasons supporting the argument that reusable bags should be put into mandatory use are that they save landfill space and wildlife, save trees, and are cheap to buy. Accordingly, these reasons and opposing viewpoints will be discussed next. The first pertinent point to make on behalf of the argument that reusable bags should …show more content…
The strongest and best reasons supporting the argument that reusable bags should be put into mandatory use are that they save landfill space and wildlife, save trees, and are cheap to buy. You may ask, why does this matter? The reason is simple. If we want to help preserve our planet and protect wildlife, if we want to help protect our planet for our children, and if we want to keep our planet clean for years to come, reusable bags should be put into mandatory use. Though it may be a small contribution to the environment, every bit helps, and in an ever more polluted world, the environment needs all the help it can