Point Of Interest Cases Of The 1960s

The 1960s were a period portrayed by much respectful distress. Citizens were not pleased with the social and political conditions, especially with treatment of minorities. Around the mid 60’s, the U.S. Supreme Court chose a progression of point of interest cases that restricted the investigative strategies utilized by cops. For instance, the court decided Mapp v. Ohio, that anything found during the search that violated the citizen’s 4th amendment could not be used against them in court. The exclusionary rule, Mapp ensured that the products of an illegal search couldn't be utilized during prosecution. In 1966, the court approved in Miranda v. Arizona that a presume must be educated with respect to his or her privilege against self-implication