Police Discretion
Policing Essay
Police discretion poses an interesting paradox in our democratic society. As Ramirez et al (2000) explains, we entrust the police to enforce the law, to maintain order, and to use legitimate force if necessary '. Not only do we expect police to complete this rather demanding task, but we also expect them to accomplish these tasks by treating the public in a fair and even-handed way '. Thus a major problem is the over policing ' and stereotyping ' of marginalized groups such as the mentally ill, homeless, indigenous or juveniles. The use of police discretion in the context of traffic stops is also an issue worthy of attention. Whilst some believe the use of police discretion unavoidably marginalizes these groups, others think the police should adopt and enforce a zero tolerance ' stance to combat the problems discretion causes. Despite the law enforcement problems discretionary powers have caused, to completely abolish it could in fact exacerbate the problems already present.
Brown (1981: 170) describes three types of indicators used by patrolmen in deciding whether or not to stop someone. These are incongruity, prior information and appearance. As two of these relate solely on looks and initial perception it is not surprising the most cited problem with police discretion is the tendency to over police and stereotype particular groups. In Australia, the empirical evidence shows that Aboriginal people are arrested at a far greater rate than others in the population (Smandych et al 1995:250) and similarly that that apprehension rates for young Aboriginal are approximately nine times higher than for non-Aborigines Luke and Cunneen (1995:81). Similar patterns emerge in other countries (such as the US) where people of African-American or Latino descent are in contact with the criminal justice system at disproportionate rate to the general population, with the youth being the major sub group affected. Teplin (2000) also identified those
Police discretion poses an interesting paradox in our democratic society. As Ramirez et al (2000) explains, we entrust the police to enforce the law, to maintain order, and to use legitimate force if necessary '. Not only do we expect police to complete this rather demanding task, but we also expect them to accomplish these tasks by treating the public in a fair and even-handed way '. Thus a major problem is the over policing ' and stereotyping ' of marginalized groups such as the mentally ill, homeless, indigenous or juveniles. The use of police discretion in the context of traffic stops is also an issue worthy of attention. Whilst some believe the use of police discretion unavoidably marginalizes these groups, others think the police should adopt and enforce a zero tolerance ' stance to combat the problems discretion causes. Despite the law enforcement problems discretionary powers have caused, to completely abolish it could in fact exacerbate the problems already present.
Brown (1981: 170) describes three types of indicators used by patrolmen in deciding whether or not to stop someone. These are incongruity, prior information and appearance. As two of these relate solely on looks and initial perception it is not surprising the most cited problem with police discretion is the tendency to over police and stereotype particular groups. In Australia, the empirical evidence shows that Aboriginal people are arrested at a far greater rate than others in the population (Smandych et al 1995:250) and similarly that that apprehension rates for young Aboriginal are approximately nine times higher than for non-Aborigines Luke and Cunneen (1995:81). Similar patterns emerge in other countries (such as the US) where people of African-American or Latino descent are in contact with the criminal justice system at disproportionate rate to the general population, with the youth being the major sub group affected. Teplin (2000) also identified those
References: Amnesty International. (1996). Police Brutality and Excessive Force in the New York City Police Department. Amnesty International Report. June 51(36) Associated Press (2005) ‘IBM Becomes Speed Enforcer in UAE ' Associated Press (2005) ‘Australia: Police Admit Average Speed Camera Error '. 20 July. Viewed 10 September 2007, Bray, R Beresford, Q. & Omaji, P. (1996) Rites of Passage: Aboriginal youth, crime and justice, Fremantle Arts Centre Press. 146 - 174. Bratton, W. (1997). Crime is down in New York City: Blame the police. London: Institute of Economic Affairs Brown, M,.K (1981) Cole, D. (1999). No Equal Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System. Engel, R.S. & Calnon, J.M. (2004). Examining the Influence of Drivers ' Characteristics During Traffic Stops with Police: Results from a National Survey. Justice Quarterly. 21(1), 49-90. Green, M (1997). Testimony of the Public Advocate before the New York City Council Committee on Public Safety. September 11. Greene, J. A. (1999). Zero Tolerance: A Case Study of Police Policies and Practices in New York City. Crime and Delinquency, vol. 45, no. 2: 171-187. Harris, D.A. (1997). Driving While Black and All Other Traffic Offences: The Supreme Court and Pretextual Traffic Stops. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Vol.87 (2) Harris, D Hodder, T., Teesson M., & Buhrich N. (1998) Down and Out In Sydney: Prevalence of Mental Disorders, Disability and Health Service Use Among Homeless People in Inner Sydney. Sydney City Mission: Sydney Joh, E Lock, E. D., J.M. Timberlake, & K.A. Rasinski. (2002) Battle fatigue: Is public support waning for "war"-centered drug control strategies? Crime and Delinquency, 48(3): 380-398. Luke, G. & Cunneen, C. (1995). Aboriginal Over-representation and discretionary decisions in the NSW Juvenile Justice System, Juvenile Justice Advisory Council of NSW, January. Luna, E. (2003) Race, Crime, and Institutional Design. Law and Contemporary Problems. 66(3). 183 -220 Markowitz, F.E Meares, T. (1998). Place and Crime. Chicago-Kent Law Review. 73:669 Pollard, C Ramirez, D., McDevitt, J. & Farrel, A (2000). A Resource Guide on Racial Profiling Data Collection Systems: Promising Practices and Lessons Learned 3. Reich, R Smandych, R., Lincoln, R., & Wilson, P. (1995). Towards a cross-cultural theory of Aboriginal criminality, Perceptions of Justice: Issues in Iindigenous and Community Empowerment, Avebury, Aldershot. Wortley, R. K. (2003). Measuring Police Attitudes Towards Discretion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 538-558. Zuckerman, A. (2004). Standards for Intelligent Transportation System Will Speed Up Supply Chains, World Trade