Preview

Political Violence During Reconstruction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
990 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Violence During Reconstruction
Samuel C. Hyde’s work, Political Violence during Reconstruction; makes it obvious that in many ways the struggles of getting along were far from over. The relationship between the white man and black man was in constant turmoil, and the political problems in the South did not help either. Harsh feelings and an extensive struggle for power was the problems which the United States faced. Many often think of the United States as peaceful after the Civil War was over, but this is far from the truth. Hyde shows how evident it was that unity of this nation was far from being reached. The carpetbaggers were northerners who supposedly carried all their belongings in a satchel made of carpet material as they came south to exploit the defeated region of the South. The white Southerners gave them this degrading name to them because they wanted to maintain control in the South. The old ruling aristocracy believed that they were born to govern, without question, not only their slaves but the white people too. The local people who supported the Republican Party and what they were trying to accomplish were known as scalawags. Scalawags and carpetbaggers were the names given to those by the white people in the South that wanted to keep running things their way. They did not want things to change. They had a lot of power and control not wanting anything to happen to it. One can only imagine the harsh feelings in the middle of these transitions after the Civil War. Along with these harsh feelings came the problems with the lower-class Louisianans in dealing with the planter elite. The lower-class Louisianans wanted to create equality between them and the planter elite in their state. They felt that things were not fair and change was needed for the better of society. They were encouraged to reassess their fealty to these planters. Through newspapers and other ways these Louisianans felt that they needed to raise their own crops and be independent from working

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    -Robber Barons were attacked very much, but believed that they had a commandment from God to help the poor (THE GOSPEL OF WEALTH)…

    • 4615 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immediately after the war ended, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation, declaring that the majority of the nation’s slave population should be set free. Two years after signing the Emancipation Proclamation, President Lincoln announced the Ten-Percent Plan, which required 10 percent of a Confederate state’s voters to pledge an oath of allegiance to the Union. However, on July 2, 1864, Radical Republicans from the House and Senate considered Lincoln’s Ten-Percent plan to be too lenient on the South, passing down the Wade-Davis Bill that required 50 percent of white males in rebel states to swear a loyalty oath to the constitution. Instead, Lincoln pocket-vetoed the bill, and as a result the Wade-Davis Bill was never…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.What were the economic and political policies of the states in the post reconstruction south? Throughout the post reconstruction period, the Democratic party dominated in almost every political aspect and controlled most state and local government decisions. The debt and finances were a huge issue in post reconstruction politics due to the debt reaching close to 17 million dollars by the year 1875. The debt itself consisted of a variety of bonds issued during the Reconstruction period. The simplest way to handle to debt would be to raise taxes, but raising taxes on manufacturing industries would ruin the government’s credit.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    conflict? To what extent and in what ways, did the Civil War and reconstruction transform…

    • 596 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1)No major social upheaval can be had without negative consequence and, coming on the heels of the most violent war in American History, Reconstruction was no exception. Given the fierce determination of the North to remake southern society and the stubborn ferocity in the south to reclaim their former lives, the African-Americans faced worse and more violent conditions during the Reconstruction period than they had during slavery. The harder the radicals in the north pressed down upon the south, the harder the south resisted. The African Americans were caught in the center. We see in Thomas Nast’s “Worse than Slavery” (p477) a depiction of how white terrorism in the form of the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremists , which the north could do little to suppress and the south felt was their only way to fight back, was actually worse than slavery. However, though many adversities and hardships were faced during Reconstruction, the net result of the effort was a positive one for the African -Americans because they attained freedom, citizenship and voting rights -- the means to improve their lives.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carpetbaggers were northerners who were searching for the possibility of economic gain. They could also be working on behalf of the slaves and fighting to make sure that their new rights were being respected. The nickname “carpetbagger” came about because the northerners would often come with very little of their possessions; they would have a small amount of their property in a satchel, or carpetbag. Scalawags were so-called “traitors” of the south. They supported giving political and civil rights to black men, but still had a white supremacy type mindset.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the main problems that the country was facing during Reconstruction was Wartime. President Lincoln issued a Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction, which offered Southerners to take an oath of loyalty to the Union and freedom’s legitimacy in December 1863. This idea was known as the Ten Percent Plan. It provided the voting population so they could set up a loyal government. By 1864, Louisiana and Arkansas states recognized a Unionist government. In 1864, congress declined to seat the Unionists voted to the House and Senate from Louisiana and Arkansas (Divine, page 368). A group known as the Radical Republicans wanted black rights protected and therefore would not engage in readmission of southern states. In July 1864, Congress passed…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I.After the war, there were many questions over what to do with the free Blacks, such as how to reintegrate the Southern states into the Union, what to do with Jefferson Davis, and who would be in charge of Reconstruction?…

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the year 1865, marks the end of the civil war with a victory to the North and granted freedom to some 4 million slaves but also marked the start of reconstruction. It was a process to put the pieces that were broken during the war back together. However, this wasn’t an easy task, for there were a lot of uprising challenges. In order to repair the nation there has to be a strong bond between the South accepting to be in the union and for freedmen to have rights but due to fear from the North who thought that it will lead to a race war and the South who believed that former slaves would come back to kill their slave masters it was nearly impossible. Reconstruction is a revolution because it was sudden, successfully caused a complete change…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Civil War the leaders of our fragmented nation were forced to face a daunting task. Government officials who did not have any constitutional guidelines on readmission had to pick of the pieces of a divided country and develop a plan that would bring states back into the Union. Furthermore, new economic and social policy was needed to accommodate freedmen. Reconstruction was a failed approach to reunite the Union because of weak policy and the inability of executives to develop a nonpartisan plan that would ease tension with the Southern states.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, despite the monumental accomplishments, reconstruction failed to dismantle the resistance of white supremacy. Numerous white southerners formed vicious organizations such as the White supremacist group the Ku Klux Klan, who used violence and intimidation to prevent black from voting as well as the whites advocated for them. Poverty also remained highly prevalent in the south, as they had benefited minimally from industrialization and were primarily still reliant on an “agricultural economy.” The widespread loss of many southerners land consequently created a dependency which precipitated reliance on borrowing and taking out liens just to survive.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Reconstruction; Reconstruction refers to the period after the civil war. It was during this time that America was beginning to clean up from the war and rebuild the country. The north and south were finally coming back together, and that brought great changes to America. The ways of living before were different compared to what they were during and after the reconstruction.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the Reconstruction began, the white community of the South bonded together, creating different patriotic organizations (or at least that’s what they called those racist associations), and trying to deprive black people from their rights and restore the old order. Instituting vagrancy laws and strict punishments for petty theft, imposing harsh penalties for not completing sharecroppers contracts, and many other harsh policies were implemented upon African Americans. Southern Democratic Party was very powerful, especially after federal troops were withdrawn from the south by Rutherford Hayes, Republican, who was given the election by Democrats. It was that time, during 1880s, when African American leaders, white and black farmers and sharecroppers, and Euro-American Populists were joining Republican Party even more actively, uprising against the Southern Democratic Party which was only presenting interests of white elite. However, that alliance between white and black republicans and populists wasn’t successfull.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democrats Vs Republicans

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Democrats had a strong opposition to Ames’ politics that steamed from a hatred for blacks and Republicans. As governor, Ames wished to fund public education through taxation, allow blacks to own land, and uphold Negro citizenship rights including voting. On the other hand, the majority of white Mississippians, nicknamed Bourbons believed that racial hierarchy was the natural order. “They considered themselves not as prejudiced against Negroes but merely as protectors of that natural order;” they did not support public education because “literacy and land tenancy would be disruptive to the plantation tenant system.” Also, the Democrats worked with the Taxpayer’s leagues in Mississippi to address concerns with taxes levied by Republicans. In addition, the viewpoint of many white southerners agreed with Congressman of Mississippi, Lucius Lamar. Lamar was “the model of the southern Bourbon politician” and a defender of slavery before the civil war. In a speech Lamar described Republicans as “gross and shameless dishonesty, their exorbitant taxation, their…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fate of Their Country

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays