Preview

Politically Correct to a Fault

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4084 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Politically Correct to a Fault
Politically Correct to a Fault For the first time in our history, Americans have to be fearful of what they say, of what they write, and of what they think. There is an importance of using politically correct statements to address the diverse population. They have to be afraid of using the wrong word, a word denounced as offensive or insensitive, or racist, sexist, or homophobic. (Lind) The First Amendment is not supporting the theory of free speech currently because everyone from authority figures, to the schoolyard population is challenged by what they say.
Politically correct, or PC for short, is defined as: of, relating to, or supporting broad social, political, and education change, especially to redress historical injustices in matters such as race, class, gender, and sexual orientation. In most recent history, the phrase “not politically correct” was introduced in the U.S. Supreme Court case, Chisholm v. Georgia, in 1793. (Blazquez) The term defined a statement that literally defied the U.S. political status at the time, and was therefore incorrect. Following the Cold War, the term described a challenge to social and political changes within the curriculum of American universities and high schools. (Beard) To deal with the changes, the American population decided to declare certain topics off-limits, and essentially ban the use of derogatory language. There are notions of political correctness that are concerned with aspects of language and power; however, such use is to do so with social groups who are in some way seen to be a minority and disadvantaged. This extreme protest to the progress of society and the education system is still felt by American citizens today.
A survey conducted by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE last year found that more than half of college students at both public and private institutions believe that a student club espousing traditional beliefs about women 's roles should not be allowed on campus;



Bibliography: Atkinson, Philip. “Political Correctness.” Our Civilisation. 2008 <http://www.civilsation.com/pc.htm>. Beard, Adrian. Language Change. Kentucky: Routledge, 2004. Billings-Harris, Lenora. “Political Correctness and Diversity in Public Speaking.” The Sideroad. 2008 <http://www.sideroad.com/Public_Speaking/political-correctness.html>. Blazquez, Agustin & Sutton, Jaums. “Political Correctness: The Scourge of Our Times.” News Max. April 8, 2002 <http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/4/4/121115.shtml>. Bleifuss, Joel. “A Politically Correct Lexicon.” In These Times. Feb. 21, 2007 <http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3027/>. Closson, Don. “Politically Correct Education.” Leadership U. July 14, 2002 <http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/pc-educ.html>. Kuphur, Shanat. “The Dilemma of Public Speaking.” AdOne Publishing. Jan. 4, 2008 <http://www.adonepublishing.com/articles/4346/1/The-Dilemma-Of-Public-Speaking/Page1.html>. Lind, Bill. “The Origins of Political Correctness.” Academia. 2008 <http://www.academia.org/lectures/lind1.html>. Paulson, Kenneth A. “Politically Correct Speech.” Freedom Forum. Oct. 7, 2001 <http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=15083>. Robertson, David. A Dictionary of Modern Politics. Kentucky:Routledge, 2002. Smith, Wesley J. “Politically Correct Eugenics.” The Weekly Standard. 13.28 (2008) <http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/014/915cuzel.asp>. Tshelska, Maryna. “Teaching Politically Correct Language.” English Teaching Forum. 2008. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. <http://exchanges.state.gov/forum/vols/vol44/no1/p20.htm Wheatley-Billeter, Martha Lou Wilson, John K. The Myth of Political Correctness: The Conservative Attack on Higher Education. North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1995.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    |Political correctness | Term which denotes languages, ideas, policies, and behaviors seen as seeking to minimize |…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment is all about your rights and how these are used in the world today. The "clear and present danger" test is a basic principle for deciding the limits of free speech. It was set by the famous Schenck v. the United States case from World War I. Anti War activist Charles Schenck was arrested for sending leaflets to prospective army draftees encouraging them to ignore their draft notices. The United States claimed that Schenck threatened national security, and the justices agreed. The principle was established that free speech would not be protected if an individual were a "clear and present danger" to United States security.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the fact that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, the Supreme Court has created a category of unprotected speech that consists of “fighting words.” In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Court defined fighting words as “words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace.” The Court established that in order for the speaker's speech to fall under the fighting words doctrine the speech must be directed to an individual face-to-face and the words must have a tendency to cause the average person to respond with an immediate violent action. Fighting words are not subject to First Amendment protection because they don’t convey ideas and are not of social value.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the editorial, “Discrimination by Another Name,” by the Washington Times, the author talks about the different problems of discrimination in colleges accepting people of a certain minority, and discarding others. The editorial also uses different rhetorical devices, connotation, and bias to affect their argument and the audience’s opinions on it. The author mostly talks about how it is wrong that colleges are still allowed to do this, even though they should not be able to. Overall, though, the author’s argument was mostly solid, except for a few times throughout the editorial when the author expressed their opinions. “Discrimination by Another Name,” an editorial about people not being accepted into different colleges, due to their race,…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article was written about the topic of political correctness in American society. This is a very relevant subject in today’s political issues. Not until recently, has America seen such a push towards this idea of political correctness, to avoid saying certain statements, facts, or truths, just because it may “offend” an opposing viewpoint. The author believes that political correctness is extremely detrimental to American…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This language restricts government’s ability to constrain the speech of citizens, however, the prohibition on abridgment of the freedom of speech is not absolute. Notwithstanding the often broad freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment, there are some historically rooted exceptions, as the Supreme Court has identified categories of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment and may be prohibited entirely. Among these categories are “fighting words” and words and actions that create an incitement of violence, both of which lay beyond the shield of First Amendment protection. I. Background In 1942, the United States Supreme Court established the “fighting words” doctrine by a 9-0 decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, where the Court held that fighting words “by their very utterance inflict injury or tend…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Duke Lacrosse Scandal

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Krauss, M. (2007). Until proven innocent: Political correctness and the shameful injustices of the Duke lacrosse rape case, by Stuart Taylor, Jr., and KC Johnson. Academic Questions, 21(1), 114-121.…

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Roger Rosenblatt endured in countries of constrained inhabitants, “the secret publication of books, the pirated music, the tricky subversive lines of poetry read at vast gatherings of tens of thousands. And the below the surface comedy” (503) will continuously arise no matter the discouragement present. In a country founded on its freedoms, the retraction of any of those privileges will be met with extreme adversity. Moreover, “since free is the way people's minds were made to be” (Rosenblatt 502) the restriction of verbal expression will only cause riots and outrage. Currently, various universities and colleges have faced the backlash of unjust speech limitations on their campuses. One student attending a college in Arizona prepares to sue the school for, “her school’s so-called “speech zone,” arguing the policy “severely limited” her right to free speech and due process” (Harkness). Reactions to a decrease in the liberty to speak freely induces immediate retaliation and hardship, in addition, to being entirely unnecessary. To keep the peace and stability, the United States must keep the freedom of speech as it was intended to be used, freely.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Political correctness |According to the Wikipedia this is a term which denotes language, ideas, policies, and |…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Christopher Newfield- assistant professor of English at the University of California, Santa Barbara- wrote an article called “What Was Political Correctness? Race, the Right, and Managerial Democracy in the Humanities”. The article was written about the challenges of politics and racial difference in humanities research. As Newfield begins his article he says, “If everyone gets the enemies they deserve, it doesn't seem fair that pluralistic liberal humanists last year found themselves denounced as the threat to…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: The American society has become so politically correct, that no one is able to speak their mind without facing major judgment or discrimination.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Matt K. Lewis of the Week Magazine,” Now, Ben Carson is very much against political correctness in general. He makes a point of saying so. During his famed National Prayer Breakfast speech, he said: "PC is dangerous because, you see, this country, one of the founding principles was freedom of thought and freedom of expression. And [political correctness] muffles people. It puts a muzzle on them. And, at the same time, keeps people from discussing important issues, while the fabric of this society is being changed." The issue on being politically correct has kept many people from saying what they want to say or feel like saying for risk of being seen as a prejudiced person. We must stand up for what we believe in and not suppress our thoughts, and feelings. According to LifeCourse Associates, magazine article “Another factor is widespread disaffection with the political establishment. Voters fed up with years of public-sector paralysis are buying into the argument that political correctness stifles the ability of our nation’s leaders to speak freely and act decisively “(Why do millennials love political correctness? Generational Values, Howe) According to a Rasmussen poll, 71% of Americans think “political correctness is a problem in America today,” up from 58% four years ago—with little difference across age groups. At a campaign event in New Hampshire, back in October, Ben Carson…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite originating in early 1990, the term political correctness did not gain notable traction until more recent years. Today the term political correctness is aimlessly thrown about in the political arena from both sides of the aisle-but what does the term truly mean? Does it achieve its purpose? To fully understand the complexities surrounding this ideology, one must first examine the raw intention and foundation of the term. Political correctness is wildly accepted as the avoidance of expressions, actions, or microaggressions that can be perceived to offend, marginalize, or exclude specific groups of people who are inherently socially disadvantaged and/or discriminated against. However well intended the terms roots may be, political correctness in America has rose to a dangerously high level; the unwavering effort by the politically correct conscious to avoid offending any certain group or individual has lead to a highly sensitive, censored, and tip-toeing society.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College students that belong to the majority group usually aren’t fond of being told that their unintentional actions mean they’re actually a racist. Conversely, those who support these checks on language grow more angry, discouraged that their majority counterparts cannot agree with strict rules on communication. Whenever something offensive is spoken, students adopt a victimized sense of self, creating a tirade of upheaval. Rather than developing mob mentality, calling for major change, peaceful discussion should instead be…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics