Preview

POST PROJECT EVALUATION

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8415 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
POST PROJECT EVALUATION
ARTICLE IN PRESS

Technovation 28 (2008) 633–643 www.elsevier.com/locate/technovation Post-project reviews as a key project management competence
Frank T. Anbaria,c,Ã, Elias G. Carayannisb,c,1, Robert James Voetschd,2 a Department of Decision Sciences, School of Business, Funger Hall 415, 2201 G Street, NW Washington, DC, USA
Department of Information Systems and Technology Management, School of Business, Funger Hall 415, 2201 G Street, NW Washington, DC, USA c The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA d Bethesda, MD, USA

b

Abstract
There is a general belief that post-project reviews are beneficial. However, such reviews are not conducted in a consistent manner, if at all, in many organizations. Therefore, there is a need to discuss post-project reviews as part of effective project management.
This paper explores the nexus of knowledge management and project management. It addresses the role of post-project reviews and their impact on the success of future projects, improvement of the overall performance of the organization and its long-term competitive position, and development of its learning processes. It discusses critical aspects and useful techniques in the implementation of postproject reviews.
The data gathered from post-project reviews provide the historical database from which future project teams can develop meaningful project plans based on their organization’s project learning cycle. This database can provide project managers and teams with the information they need on specific staff skill set needs, and the profile of the customer and operating environment that can impact the ultimate success of projects and project management.
The paper discusses where post-project reviews fit into the project life cycle and project management processes. It assesses how such reviews can assist an organization in improving the manner in which its projects are conceived, planned, implemented, reported, and evaluated. r



References: Anbari, F.T., 1985. A systems approach to project evaluation. Project Management Journal XVI (3), 21–26. Argyris, C., 1999. On organizational learning, second ed. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Busby, J.S., 1999. An assessment of post-project reviews. Project Management Journal 30 (3), 23–29. Carayannis, E.G., 1998. The strategic management of technological learning in project/program management: the role of extranets, Carayannis, E., Coleman, J., 2005. Creative system design methodologies: the case of complex technical systems Carayannis, E.G., Voetsch, R.J., Anbari, F.T., 2005. Stakeholder mapping and the execution of successful projects: embedding and Cleland, D.I., 1985. A strategy for ongoing project evaluation. Project Management Journal XVI (3), 11–17. Collier, B., DeMarco, T., Fearey, P., 1996. A defined process for project postmortem review Drucker, P.F., 1995. Managing in a Time of Great Change. Truman Talley, New York, NY. Forman, E.H., Gass, S.I., 2001. The analytic hierarchy process—an exposition Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J., 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25 (7), 735–755. Huemann, M., Anbari, F.T., 2007. Project auditing: a tool for compliance, governance, empowerment, and improvement Kerzner, H., 1984. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, second ed Kerzner, H., 2006. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, ninth ed Kull, M.D., 2005. Scaling the water cooler: digital storytelling for knowledge continuity Kwak, Y.H., Anbari, F.T., 2006. Benefits, obstacles, and future of Six Sigma approach Locurcio, R.V., 2005. Project management during the reconstruction of Kuwait Malik, K., 2002. Aiding the technology manager: a conceptual model for intra-firm technology transfer Newell, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Scarbrough, H., Swan, J., 2006. Sharing knowledge across projects Nissen, M.E., Snider, K.F., 2005. Defense project management knowledge flow through lessons learned systems pp. 1133–1186. Nonaka, I., 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., 1995. The Knowledge Creating Company. Project Management Institute, 2004. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOKs Guide), third ed Russell, J.P. (Ed.), 2006. The ASQ Auditing Handbook, third ed. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI. Scholtes, P.R., Joiner, B.L., Streibel, B.J., 2003. The Team Handbook, third ed Senge, P., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization US Army, 1997. Center for Army Lessons Learned Handbook, Fort Leavenworth, KS, pp von Zedtwitz, M., 2002. Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R&D Williams, T., 2006. How do organizations learn from projects? In: Proceedings of PMI Research Conference [CD], Montreal, Canada,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    It Management Mgt2 Task 3

    • 4060 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Cited: A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide 5th edition).Newtown Square, Pa.: Project Management Institute, Inc., (2013)…

    • 4060 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CMGT 410 week 5

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This MEMO will cover the benefits and drawbacks of a Post Mortem review. It will notify all who are going to be required to partake in the final review meeting. It will also go over what we hope to discover after the termination of the project.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Project Management Institute. 2004. A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge Third Edition. Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute, Inc…

    • 13536 Words
    • 144 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK guide (4th ed.). Newton Square, PA: Author. ISBN: 9781933890517.…

    • 13779 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Project Management Institute. (2000). _A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (4th ed.)._…

    • 1150 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    It301 Unit 5

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Institute, P. M. (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. (4th edition). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Post Mortem Review

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The benefits of this review are to list the goals versus outcome of the project, the budget against the final costs, and stakeholder participation. It is also helpful to document what went well and what did not go well during this project. Areas to review are morale, communications, and cost components such as hardware, software, office space, people, time, and budget. This should also include project scope, requirements, conflict management, and deadlines.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Piatkiewicz, E. (2007). Lessons learned process aligns with project life-cycle, operations and engineering governance. AACE International Transactions, (15287106), PM101-PM101-PM105. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/208175738?accountid=35812…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While project audits use performance measures and forecast data, they are generally more inclusive than the performance measurement control system discussed in Chapter 13. Project audits include a review of why the project was selected, a reassessment of the project’s role in the organization’s priorities, a check on the organizational culture, an assessment of team performance, lessons learned, and a check on external factors that might affect the project direction or importance. A project audit is intended to include all factors relevant to the project and managing future projects.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Synaptic Corporation

    • 2810 Words
    • 12 Pages

    PMBOK. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. (4th ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Inst.…

    • 2810 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to, Chapter One of our book, which identifies some of the characteristics of a project, I can identify several that apply to this project. For one, it has an established objective to increase the number of monthly project reviews. The life span of the project consists of completing it by the end of our fiscal year. This project has involvement from multiple departments and professionals. This project will involve several disciplines and professional staff. The cooperation from the…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamilton, Albert. Managing by Projects: Achieving Success in a Changing World. London: Thomas Telford, 1997. Print.…

    • 4370 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    - Post-project audit: tend to include more detail and depth than the in-process audit. These audits emphasize improving the management of future projects and are more long-term oriented. Although this type of audit does check on the project performance, it really represents a broader view of the project’s role in the organization.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    maximum megahertz

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thirdly, during the fourth week, a report on studies should be composed on the basis of similar projects elsewhere (Goleman, 2000). This basically aims at understanding how others have approached a similar project. It also gives an overview of various challenges that may arise in project implementation, and the process of handling these challenges. The project manager…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the evaluation process an assessment is made on cost, efficiency, programs outcome, programs impact, program implementation, design, and program logic. A reflection of the project scope takes place during the evaluation process where a comparison between what was needed and what was provided is examined. An impact evaluation measures whether the project has achieved its intended outcomes. Cost effectiveness analysis assesses the efficiency of a project. During the evaluation, an outline of the benefits and cost of the program will be reviewed for comparison. Throughout the life cycle of the project, the project team will collect lessons learned. While the project is in cycle, the team members will record both good and bad lessons learned. In essence, the team will record new events that occurred within the life cycle of the project. This type of evaluation will both strengthen individual team members and the project team. The evaluation process will include both internal and external evaluations. The internal evaluation will be done by the project manager. The project manager will have a better overall knowledge of the program and also possess informal knowledge of the program. The project manager is already familiar with the project staff allowing the evaluation process to be less threatening. Finally having the project manager perform the team evaluation is cost effective. The…

    • 3705 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics