Preview

Power Struggles

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
814 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Power Struggles
There is a constant struggle for power in today’s society. There are citizens who are defending their rights, such as the freedom to protest, while authority figures try to reprimand them. The people are becoming more united and they are realizing that there is power in numbers, and that scares the government. The three branches have to keep innovating ways to have the people under control, and an effective method that is used is the “scare tactics” method. The government essentially uses guinea pigs, or in this case alleged terrorists, to set example for the other people of what power the government possesses. In the “Power to Kill” an editorial in The New York Times a controversy which involves the American government killing American citizens is brought up. In the editorial it is stated “President Obama, who came to office promising transparency and adherence to the rule of law, has become the first president to claim the legal authority to order an American citizen killed without judicial involvement.” This is a clear example of what the government is capable of. These forms of action should not go by unnoticed and they should not be tolerated, the killing of American citizens executed by the government is a step in the wrong direction. We the people need to keep gathering our strength in numbers and fight for what we believe in. Currently, the president has the right to order a “hit” on an American citizen is there is compelling evidence that they are an imminent threat and capturing them is out of the question. The ticking bomb scenario would be the appropriate name for said circumstance. The only time that the government is incapable of capturing a citizen is right before the citizen commences their attack. But since there needs to be compelling evidence, wouldn’t the government need to be tracking said citizen for a long time? Before they go in and kill someone the government needs to build a strong case to protect themselves against

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The practical application of the defence power in an age of terrorism is difficult to determine, as it is reliant upon a set of circumstances that can have a plethora of different interpretations from a range of variant perspectives. Unlike some other powers, the defence power is purposive and elastic; it waxes and wanes, and its application “depends upon the facts, and as those facts change so may its actual operation as a power”[1]. Recent developments, such as the Thomas case, have led some theorists to comment that “the elastic of the defence power has become stretched all out of proportion”[2]. In its present interpretation, the defence power is no longer simply fixed on an external aggressor. Instead, the enemy is disguised domestically. It no longer depends upon judicial notice, or requires an expression of proportionality “in a context where the fact of war or piece is important”[3]. However, the reasoning behind this breed of jurisprudence is hard to decipher. The balance between liberty and safety seems to be somewhat askew. In this essay, I will attempt to argue that the defence power is, at least in its present reincarnation, excessively aggressive and at odds with other constitutional guarantors to freedom of speech.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author Jonathan Alter has written essay titled:”time to think about torture.” Mr. alter refers to the time. It in the United States history as the: “autumn to of anger.” He describes multiple torture methods and gives examples in detail their uses. He refers to the time: Prior to September 11th, “hopelessly September 10th.” Mr. Altar explains that that era of time had many wrong assumptions about law and its enforcement in reference to terrorism. By a vote of 98 to 1 PM The Anti- terrorism bill was passed and history was made. Chief Justice Robert Jackson stated:”the Constitution is not a suicide pact. “This comment by the Chief…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    September 11, 2001 changed America forever. The 9/11 cases challenged the government power and its relation to individual rights during times of war. Al-Qaeda, a terrorist organization funded by Osama bin Laden targeted the American government in a series of deadly attacks on 9/11 that killed over 3000 people and injured scores of others. The United States declared an act of war against Terrorism and soon was heavily involved in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Similar to the Korematsu v. U.S. (1944) Supreme Court cases where Congress authorization forces the government to comply with an order. The 9/11 cases were no ordinary in nature but it was different from similar cases. One must understand the complexity of the cases and the course of action…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although in the 1990s capital punishment was popular among most American citizens, the pendulum has swung to an uncomfortable middle where people are either completely for or completely against it (“National Polls and Studies”). In Zachary Shemtob and David Lat’s “Executions Should be Televised” and David Bruck’s “The Death Penalty,” the authors believe that American citizens should be against capital punishment because it not only takes rights guaranteed to us by our nation’s constitution away from those who must suffer the eternal punishment, but also away from the tax-paying and law-abiding citizens. When examining these essays together, readers can get a glimpse of how some of their rights, such as the promise from the government that as a democracy it will remain transparent, or promises from our nation’s constitution, are being hindered.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    America is spoken so highly of for giving its citizens all these freedoms and rights, but it does not make itself look good when it strips its people of those rights during times of war. Civil liberties have been suspended for many citizens who the constitution states are lawful citizens of this country. The question though, is whether this is lawful, just, and should be allowed to be executed on America’s citizens. Not prisoners of war, not convicted felons or terrorists, not known threats to the country, but America’s very own innocent citizens.…

    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the wake of the worst terrorist attacks in U.S. history on September 11, 2001, just six weeks later with little Congressional resistance or analysis; the U.S. Congress passed into law the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act titled “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” granted an unprecedented and vast power to federal investigative services, which greatly undermines the civil liberties and constitutional freedom of the American people. The main objective of the Patriot Act is "to deter and punish terrorist acts in the U.S. and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes," (Act, 2001, p. 1). Despite this purpose, the Act represents both good and bad points with respect to fighting terrorism and negative consequences on the civil liberties of U.S. citizens. For the most part, I believe the USA Patriot Act does little to combat terrorism and represents a threat to the liberties of the American people.…

    • 2951 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the primary themes Mark Twain uses throughout The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is that of deception. Twain uses many forms and styles of deception not only to illustrate varying degrees of it, but also to draw a distinction between morally permissible and morally corrupt lies. Twain introduces different forms of deception brought about by a myriad of catalysts. Throughout the book, Twain uses Huck, the Duke and the King to compare and contrast different forms of lying, and to illustrate how context plays a large role in the moral weight of a deception.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    George Bush Dbq

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page

    In George Bush's speech on September 20, 2001, after a major terrorist attack on America, he states that the country will take whatever means necessary to stop terrorists around the world. He makes it clear that all Americans will have to put forth an effort to end terrorism. They would also have to understand that they may have to give up some things in order to gain justice. During the Salem Witch Trials,which took place far before the Bill of Rights were written, the courts believed that by condemning and killing these so called "witches" they were working toward the greater good. They were convinced that they were cleansing the world of evil. If the government finds it necessary to violate people's personal liberties for the betterment…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not agree that a power differential places blame on the victim. That discrepancy makes the perpetrator much more culpable. In incidents between children there must be an age difference of at least three years for the actions to be considered abuse. Two years and 364 days between the two is considered inappropriate and not abusive. A power differential between the victim and the perpetrator is always an issue. The differential is not always age or size. I cannot think of an abusive situation where there is not some sort of power distance. I believe this is exacerbated when dealing with children who are abused. Is it a child’s fault that she is smaller, poorer, and less emotionally mature than the person who rapes her? Absolutely…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties History

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Habeas corpus and the war on terror have only grown increasingly relevant as days pass. One of the more well-known uses of habeas corpus stems from the September 11, 2001 attacks against the United States. It was on the wake of this historical tragedy that President Bush not only launched a war on terrorism, but the USA PATRIOIT Act of 2001 was passed. As a wartime measure, the PATRIOT Act allowed federal authorities to arrest and hold suspected terrorists without filing formal charges. Individuals detained on suspicion of terrorism were not entitled to an attorney (Levin-Waldman, 2012). In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), the Supreme Court ruled the prisoners had limited rights at his or her disposal with which to challenge the enemy combatant characterization (Foley, 2007). The debate over habeas corpus has erupted in an emotional time of healing for United States citizens. What is difficult to grasp is that in the midst of tragedy, in the center of emotional turmoil, in the middle of a nation full of questions, habeas corpus is a civil liberty, like many others that desperately required clarification in a changing…

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Con Torture

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In a post-9/11 world, where it seems that terrorism is rampant and increasing numbers of extremists threaten the safety and wellbeing of American citizens, is it ever justified to bend the rules of legality and morality while fighting the war on terror? Whether or not the use of torture as an interrogation tactic is justified in these circumstances is questionable because of controversy about its legality, morality, and effectiveness; the use of torture would violate several international and domestic laws as well as compromise American morals and beliefs. Despite this controversy, the United States has employed these tactics in recent years to questionable effect; however, the use of it is illegal, immoral and ineffective. Torture should not be used in any circumstance because it violates American morals, political treaties, and laws, would diminish the reputation of the United States in the world, has not been proven effective by scientific evidence, and would create a future of uncertainty regarding the use of torture.…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law enforcement agencies and governments have long used torture to question criminals and terrorists. It is used to coax confessions or to find out any sort of information that may lead to the arrest or capture of other criminals. Although the torturing of prisoners in the United States is strictly prohibited by the constitution, the government started using the tactic waterboarding against terrorists. Although the government says waterboarding has led to prevention on mass terrorist attacks on U.S soil, it is not accepted by all of this country’s citizens. It is believed by certain people that waterboarding is torture and others do not believe it is. I believe this method is wrong and it is my goal to explore why the United States deemed this technique necessary and why I believe it is unconstitutional.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays