Pros And Cons Of Death With Dignity Act
Three states have achieved Death with Dignity Act: Oregon, Vermont, and most recently in 2008 Washington. These laws grant mentally competent, terminally-ill adult state residents to voluntarily request and receive a prescription medication to hasten their death. Death with Dignity Act which allow a terminally ill patient to precipitate an impending and unavoidable death. However this not suicide or euthanasia; rather, a possible choice if the pain from the underlying illness gets to be too much or quality of life too degraded. While many faith traditions adhere to ancient traditions and understandings of physical life's final journey. Death with Dignity Act offers dying individuals an opportunity to ponder an important final life question,
…show more content…
People that are against, say that it is God’s decision when a person dies and no one should hamper with that. Others say it is a humane and compassionate thing to allow people who are close to death and in pain decide to do. The conversely over the Death with Dignity Act as has inspired many pros and cons, for example, legalizing Death with Dignity will help in alleviating the patient’s suffering of terminal ill. It will be unfair and inhuman to allow them stand the intolerable pain vs. Death with Dignity or mercy killing is ethically incorrect and must be prohibited by law, and that is to be considered as homicide and killing or murdering another individual may not be rationalized on any circumstances. Given that Death with dignity must be a normal extension of the rights of the patient enabling him to make a decision about the value of death and life. Keeping a life support method against the wish of the patient is recognized to be unethical by medical philosophy and by law vs. the life of every human deserves exceptional protection and security, and with innovative medical technology should make it more possible to improve quality of life and life span, and palliative care centers are more favorable alternatives to assist dying patients live a better and pain-free
People that are against, say that it is God’s decision when a person dies and no one should hamper with that. Others say it is a humane and compassionate thing to allow people who are close to death and in pain decide to do. The conversely over the Death with Dignity Act as has inspired many pros and cons, for example, legalizing Death with Dignity will help in alleviating the patient’s suffering of terminal ill. It will be unfair and inhuman to allow them stand the intolerable pain vs. Death with Dignity or mercy killing is ethically incorrect and must be prohibited by law, and that is to be considered as homicide and killing or murdering another individual may not be rationalized on any circumstances. Given that Death with dignity must be a normal extension of the rights of the patient enabling him to make a decision about the value of death and life. Keeping a life support method against the wish of the patient is recognized to be unethical by medical philosophy and by law vs. the life of every human deserves exceptional protection and security, and with innovative medical technology should make it more possible to improve quality of life and life span, and palliative care centers are more favorable alternatives to assist dying patients live a better and pain-free