The peer reviewed Quarterly Review of Biology states that the first of these laws were lobbied most ardently by state-employed physicians, but supporters also came from law, scientific, and political backgrounds (Reilly, 1987). Despite protests from anti-eugenics organizations, an upward trend in the popularity of negative eugenics still prevailed in at least several states, whose sterilization trends are shown by Lutz Kaelber, an Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Vermont (Kaelber, 2012). The failure of these protests can be seen in the 1925 Supreme Court Decision, Buck v. Bell. In this landmark case, the practice of compulsory sterilization is upheld when the plaintiff, Carrie Buck, is deemed unfit to bear children (1925). This judicial decision shows the extent to which the ideology of the eugenics movement permeated the United States, which shows the negative impacts of attempting to better humanity through discriminatory practices. Eugenics, though first rooted in science, took a dark turn as seen with compulsory sterilization laws upheld in Buck v. Bell, which allowed for nearly 35,000 sterilizations of “undesirable persons” across the eugenics era in merely the five states of California, Minnesota, Iowa, Georgia, and North …show more content…
Though positive eugenics—the encouragement of those with desirable traits to reproduce—was Germany’s first dip into the eugenics movement as per Garland E. Allen, Washington University professor, the idea of a master race came full force under the reign of Adolph Hitler (Allen, 2005). Hitler’s promotion of the ideal Aryan family led to discrimination against the Jewish people and other undesirable people such as the mentally disabled or handicapped. Hitler released numerous propagandistic posters to show the types of people he felt should procreate (Harris, 2006). Though the specific appearance of the Jews went against the Aryan face, Hitler’s “cleanse” of Germany did not stop with