On May 7, 2015 the Federal Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the National Security Agency's collection of American phone records in bulk is illegal. Specifically, they ruled that the practice did not fall under the scope of the USA Patriot Act, which allows wire tapping of individuals to detect and prevent terrorism. What is the USA Patriot Act? The USA Patriot Act is a 10-letter acronym for uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act of 2001. It was passed by Congress following the terrorist attacks of September 11 and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001. Later when it was set to expire in 2011 Barack Obama renewed the law for another 4 years. The Patriot Act…
After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the United States adopted stringent measures to fight terrorism by passing new legislation and amending existing legislation. The U.S. Senate quickly passed the USA PATRIOT ACT, which mean Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The USA PATRIOT ACT was a new tool to fight terrorism head on. The USA PATRIOT ACT bill was signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2011. The USA PATRIOT ACT bill gives the court authorize to issue the search order for any United States citizen who law enforcement agency believes that maybe involved in terrorist activities. Some states, cities and towns within the United States did not agree with some of…
On September 11, 2001, four passenger planes were hijacked by sixteen members of the terrorist organization known as al-Qaeda. Two of the planes were sent to the World Trade Center in New York City, another was sent to the Pentagon in Washington D.C, while the final plane was forcibly brought down in fields outside of suburban Pennsylvania. These hijackings led to the loss of 2,980 lives, and the events of 9/11 would become the largest terrorist attack on United States soil. In the wake of these attacks, Congress quickly passed the USA PATRIOT Act, also known as the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act. The Patriot Act, as it is more commonly referred to, was created with the goal of providing government agencies the tools to seek out and prosecute any terrorists planning an attack within the country. Unfortunately for the American people, Congress was indifferent to the fact that many provisions of the Patriot Act were a violation of the Constitution. The Patriot Act has granted government establishments the capability of…
The War on Terrorism and Patriot Act are two important acts regarding terrorism. What is the War on Terrorism and Patriot act you may ask? Well the Patriot act was made so that the United States could hold someone in custody if they are connected or could piently be connected to terrorist groups. Now we have the War on Terrorism act. This act was made so that in the case of a terrorist attack they can stop it with military action. Even though they both have their pros they also have cons. Terrorism is horrible and can lead to the death of innocent people but there are ways we can stop it including and not including the patriot act and War on Terrorism.…
No, in any case it's a disturbing and terrible method for completing an awful and noxious act against pure individuals. One local may punch another, and not present a show of war. War is generally acknowledged to be a declared threats between two nations, as when the United States reported the war against the Axis powers Japan, Germany and Italy on December 8, 1941.…
The general purpose of this speech is to demonstrate. The specific purpose is to show how to shoot a lacrosse ball, catch a lacrosse ball and cradle the lacrosse ball. I am going to show you the proper way to shoot the ball, the right way to catch the ball and the correct way cradle the ball.…
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."- Benjamin Franklin…
The attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001 saw the largest loss of life of US civilians, in the US, from an outside enemy. As a result of the attacks, President Bush declared a “Global War on Terror.” To prevent another terror attack, Congress felt it must provide additional powers to US law enforcement and intelligence agencies. In 2001, Congress passed the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept or Obstruct Terrorism Acts of 2001, or colloquially referred to as the PATRIOT Act. While many will argue the PATRIOT Act is helpful in combating terrorism, critics argue it infringes on the 4th Amendment rights of US citizens.…
In light of recent events, tensions amongst American communities and police officers have heightened due to the shootings of unarmed civilians and the alleged use of excessive force. These events have brought the integrity of police officers into question raising the question onto whether or not police officers should wear body cameras. This would serve to improve public relations with the local communities and provide a new source of indisputable hard evidence. Unfortunately, everything also comes with its disadvantages and while the benefits of body cameras do outweigh the negatives on paper, they may still not be enough to result in wide scale implementation. Such disadvantages include cost, as the cost of a single body camera ranges from $400 to $700 (Taser International Inc.) The reliability of these cameras may also be called into question as technological bugs are inevitable. According to research conducted by PERF and the COPS office, officers should be required to activate their cameras when responding to calls meaning that they are turned off while on duty. This may allow a police officer to tamper with evidence or to manipulate the cameras as they are in total control. Body cameras may be a potential solution for a growing problem, and while there seem to be an abundance of benefits, many drawbacks do also question the viability of such a project.…
Recently, police departments across the country have received much scrutiny for recent actions. The latest installment to the never-ending saga, that we all follow on the evening news, is the highly controversial topic of police body cameras. These cameras would attempt to provide an officers perspective to difficult situations and might help explain the actions of our police officers. Two recent articles published by the L.A. Times and The New York Times outline the pros and cons to making body cameras standard issue. The article published by the L.A. Times written by Matt Pearce takes a negative stance on the topic. The article clearly outlines the cons to body cameras and provides little insight to their benefits. The article published by…
Racial profiling is a very widespread topic. Racial profiling is beginning to spread across the United States and many other countries as if a fire spread in a forest. It is important for us to understand that racial profiling is impractical and hurtful to the persons targeted. It is also important for people to recognize that racial profiling puts fear into people’s hearts and that can have an emotional impact on the way people think, act and even their character. Racial Profiling should be a exercise that should be ended in all places including the court system and law enforcement. One can come up with several illustrations declaring its advantages and disadvantages. Although racial profiling can be useful in certain cases it is incorrect…
What exactly is wire tapping? Do you think wiretapping is occurring in your everyday life? Wire tapping is the practice of connecting a listening device to a telephone line to secretly monitor a conversation. This can play a key role in helping law enforcements in the end. As President Obama states, “When I came into this office, I made two commitment that are more important than any commitment I made: number one , to keep American people safe and number two, to uphold the Constitution.”…
Is everything actually secure, or do they mislead us into false hope? The FBI, CIA, and our troops fight vigorously for our safety, but they are only human and cannot stop every crime. A national surveillance system in the government could stop actions before it happened. If violent crimes could be stopped before it happened, who wouldn’t jump to the cause? Millions of people could be living in peace. While security is important, some might reject being monitored because it is against their will. A surveillance system will know everything in people’s public lives and calculate every action. Private things will now turn into public business. If we were stubborn enough to reject an idea of a surveillance system, then we are letting the population die by violent hate crimes. The violence in our country will only grow in time, we must take action to stop it. We must be willing to sacrifice, believe, and fight for justice. There is no protection in the submission to crime. We must take action in the well-being of to nation. If it were to mean giving up some of our rights, it is for a worthy cause. Let’s stop crime and protect our beloved United…
The concept of living in a surveillance society with no fear as long as individuals have nothing to hide sounds ideal; but even if people are not guilty of committing a crime, there are a number of reasons why loss of privacy should concern them. A significant concern is that the…
Criminal profiling, a practice initiated by the FBI, began in the 1970’s (James et al., 2014; 542). Profiling is used by law enforcement officials for all types of crime, including serial killings, “to supply offender characteristics to help investigators narrow the field of suspects based on the characteristics of the crime scene and initial investigative information” (James et al., 2014; 542). It is used to aide investigators in catching the killer or to link a person in custody to a crime, but does not provide any support in court (James et al., 2014; 543) (White et al., 2011; 164). Several definitions of a serial killer exist, but it is most commonly defined as an individual who has murdered three or more people over a period of more than a month (Taylor et al., 2011; 31). Crimes begin to be investigated as serial murders when there are several deaths…