Preview

Pros And Cons Of Houston Bombing

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Houston Bombing
3. WINSTON CHURCHILL SHOULD BE FOUND GUILTY UNDER ARTICLE 8(2)(a)(iv) FOR EXTENSIVE DESTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATION OF PROPERTY, NOT JUSTIFIED BY MILITARY NECESSITY AND CARRIED OUT UNLAWFULLY AND WANTONLY AND ARTICLE 8(2)(b)(ii) FOR INTENTIONALLY DIRECTING ATTACKS AGAINST CIVILIAN OBJECTS, THAT IS, OBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT MILITARY OBJECTIVES.

Hamburg, a major industrial center for Germany, was the target of Operation Gomorrah and extensive bombings by the British military, under the leadership and approval of prime minister Winston Churchill. Hamburg was bombed for ten days. While Hamburg was well-defended, after the first days of bombing the military buildings were effectively destroyed, and the military personnel vaporized. The rest of the bombings would simply be to demoralize and cause more destruction amongst the population.

Incendiary bombs were specially selected to cause the most damage possible, causing fire and
…show more content…
10 days of bombing was overkill. Hamburg’s military defenses were destroyed early in the process, leading to an excessive and unnecessary amount of destruction to a target that was no longer militarily necessary, thus clearly violating Article 8(2)(a)(iv).

Additionally, under prime minister Winston Churchill, there would be a massacre of Greek civilians on December 3, 1944. On this day, a group of civilians demonstrating in support of the National Liberation Front would be massacred by British troops, with Churchill allowing the massacre to be carried out because he felt Communism within the National Liberation Front he had supported had grown too strong. Twenty-eight of the demonstrators would be killed for simply chanting “Viva Churchill, Viva Roosevelt, Viva Stalin” and holding “Greek, American, British, and Soviet flags”.

This act clearly shows that Churchill violated Article 8(2)(b)(ii) by directing civilian objects, who were obviously not military objectives, be massacred by British

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dresden, Germany, 1945. “The British Royal Air Force (RAF) and the U.S. Air Force initiated a strategic bombing campaign in Dresden, Germany” (“Dresden Bombing” par.1). The attacks from Great Britain and the United States were prompted by earlier bomb raids conducted by Germany on British soil. With orders coming in from Arthur Harris, leader of bomb command for RAF, the bombing in Dresden began February thirteenth of the year 1945. The initial bomb raid from RAF was then later followed by 771 tons of bombs being dropped by United States aircrafts (“Dresden Bombing” par. 2-3). To this day there is still controversy around this major event. Whether it should considered a war crime against innocent civilians…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America would bomb Germany throughout the day and Britain would bomb Germany throughout the night. Air planes dropping bombs was not the only change that made this war so much more destructive. This war lead to the war weapon advancements such as tanks, which were used to storm and take over cities which torn cities and towns apart. This war also included a lot more ships than ever before, in fact warships were in the thousands. Along with Air planes, ships and tanks, you need something to destroy them so now they had made huge cannons to shoot these war machines and blow them up. The numbers of these new war weapons could possible explain why the was so destructive with Almost a half million air planes, eight thousand war ships, two-hundred thousand tanks and half a million artillery cannons, it was almost destined to be destructive. Then when you would think the war could not get any more destructive the Manhattan project was put together an Atomic bomb that would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These bombs would deal so much damage it would completely end the war with…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On September 11, 2001, about 3,000 people were killed, and over 6,000 people were injured in the United States. Al-Qaeda, a group of Islamic extremists, hijacked four airplanes to execute suicide attacks. Two of the compromised airliners hit the World Trade Center towers in New York City. Another plane struck the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and the last plane crashed in Pennsylvania in a field. The American people were unfortunately surprised because of those attacks; many loved ones were lost, and many terrorists escaped from our government’s reach. Because of this infamous event, the officials of the United States government have debated and are currently debating whether they, the government, should be allowed to observe and retain information…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the bombing there was no food available and the water was contaminated. The population was desperate, this resulted in the loss of even more lives due to the poisoning. Another issue was pregnancies due to the bombing if a mother had been subjected to the bomb their baby would most likely be deformed, and for those who wanted kids they couldn't have any because they would be at the same risk of deformity due to the affects the bombing causes in a person's body. This poisoning stayed with people for many years following the bombings they couldn't escape the side effects. Also the whole population had to leave their homes and evacuate the infected area.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Pros And Cons

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page

    September 11 2001, marked a very tragic day in history, and immediate action was required in order to handle the situation. During the Bush administration, surveillance programs were put into place in order to monitor possible hostile actions towards our country. In a post Snowden article in 2006, Robert A. Levy went into depth about what Article II is and if current programs put into place can be deemed illegal. After reviewing Article II and Levy’s position I agree that it was illegal, but I believe that this was because what need to take place was described vaguely and was left up to interpretation. The fourth amendment speaks about using “reasonableness,” what might be reasonable to one may not mean the same to another. Due to this, abuse…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Pros And Cons

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “We might have accomplished something if we have been able to treat the terrorist attacks of 9/11 in a way similar to how we treat the damage on the nation's highways-by implementing practices and requirements that are directly related to results (as in the case of speed limit, safety belts, and the like, which took decades to accomplish in the cause of auto safety)-rather than by throwing the nation into a near panic and using the resulting fears to justify expensive but not necessarily effective or even relevant measures.”…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Luftwaffe first targeted shipping convoys and shipping centers, but later focused on destroying RAF infrastructure, including radar sites and airfields (Axelrod). In the later stages of the campaign, they targeted aircraft factories, towns and cities. British fortunes were also helped by the fact that the Luftwaffe had never subscribed to a concept of strategic bombing. “British anti-aircraft and civil-defense preparations were inadequate in the summer of 1940”, yet the Luftwaffe was unable to wreak the devastating effects feared by many (Axelrod). German tactics were changed again and the Luftwaffe resorted to indiscriminate bombing of larger cities, including London, Plymouth and Coventry. British fighters were also inexperienced compared…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equal protection under the law is a legal principal as the United States itself. The term criminal act does not, in modern times, have a universally accepted definition. Terrorism is certainly a crime in that it usually involved casualties. At times I feel that we forget that acts of terror come in many different sizes. Earlier this year the Boston Marathon Bombing shook the nation to its core.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More than 40 000 civilians were killed and one million London houses were either destroyed or damaged. Initial German bombing raids focused on mainly military and industrial targets. However, Hitler believed that by targeting civilians he could force the British to surrender. It was an attempt to shatter British morale and force Churchill into negotiating. However, the bombing had the opposite effect, bringing the English people together to face a common enemy. Encouraged by Churchill, the people became determined to hold out against the Nazi…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due to all the bombs being dropped many people were forced to move out of their homes. This caused a lot of hardship for the civilians because people had to move house due to the “ghastly [air] raids” source 2 says. Source 2 also tells us that “For amidst such suffering and hardship…Everyone seems intent only on patching roofs, propping up walls, cooking fried potatoes on an upturned electric iron” this source tells us that life would have been very hard for the civilians. We know that this would be true because source 1 shows us that houses have fallen down and people are moving out because it is very unsafe to live where they are. Source 4 also tells us a little bit of how hard it was for the civilians in London, it shows a German man dropping bombs on London but it also shows that it did not affect them. Even though a lot of deaths occurred there was lots of buildings destroyed, they still stood strong, this doesn’t mean it wasn’t hard for the civilians though. Warfare did cause a lot a hardship for civilians.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, days after the bombing, the United States went to war with Japan and Germany. President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared the invasion as “ a date which will live in infamy”. This attack was such a tragedy because there were 2,503 Americans casualties and 1,178 people…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages

    There were terrorist attacks against the U.S. prior to 9/11, but it is generally accepted that the War on Terror started with the attacks on September 11, 2002, when four airplanes were hijacked by terrorists and were crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center, the south tower of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon building, and one plane crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after the passengers overpowered the hijackers and piloted the plane into a field so that it would not harm anyone on the ground. George W. Bush, in 2002, took action days after September 11th, and he started what he called a "War on Terror (Samuels).” The George W. Bush administration coined the term "War on Terror" which refers to the battle with the…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oklahoma Bombing Tragedy

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When tragedy strikes, it is not uncommon for a well revered figure to respond to such an event as common people look up to them for guidance. Robert F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton are no exceptions, while the initial is addressing the sudden assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and the latter concerning towards The 1995 Oklahoma Bombing, both are responding towards tragic loss and the aftermath that should follow. In their speeches, “A Eulogy For Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.” and “Oklahoma Bombing Memorial Address,” Robert F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton enhance their claims by appealing towards an emotional appeal, a logical appeal, and personal connection in order to insist that we must try to get over the loved ones that have passed away and continue their legacy through compassion, not hate, but Kennedy utilizes rational reasons more while Clinton incorporates more moving personally touching words in order to impact their audiences.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My paper is about the Oklahoma City Bombing. My paper will include a summary of the event and the charges that the terrorists faced. I will also include information on the youngest survivor, and a famous photo taken showing a firefighter holding a deceased child.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This are the main reasons that I picked out or I thought had the most effect on why the allies dropped 3300 tons of bombs. In their bomb bay was a deadly concentration of high-explosive and fire-causing incendiary bombs. Each Lancaster bomber carried roughly 1.5 tones of high explosive bombs and 2.25 tones of incendiaries. In all, many of the bombs that were dropped were incendiary bombs. These created so much fire that formed a firestorm. The firestorm burned in large amount and since, many buildings were made of wood, the fire caught faster. These types of bombs were mostly used because it needed lots of oxygen to burn. The more, the city burned the…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays