Random locker searches show equality and help keep schools a safe environment.
Random locker searches show equality and help keep schools a safe environment.
Some of the fundamental differences between the Americans and English were the idea of a monarchy, the search and seizure policies, and their judicial interpretations. In England, when the Magna Carta was written, it was used to limit the king’s power without completely taking it away. In America, the Constitution was written in such a way that the president’s power was equal to that of the other two branches of government. America was afraid of a ruler becoming too strong. Another contrast was the policy of search and seizure. The British created the writs of assistance, which allowed the government to take the property of anyone under the suspicion of any crime. The fourth amendment of the Constitution, however, protected anyone from the…
School administrators and law enforcement officers have different regulations when a search or seizure is being conducted, especially concerning that of a minor. School administrators only need reasonable suspicion to search a student while law enforcement officers must have probable cause. In the cases of Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, the issues of search and seizure of a student in school are laid out in different scenarios that clearly portray the difference between a constitutional search and an unconstitutional search. The concept of reasonable suspicion is sufficient for the extended search in the Best V. New Jersey case because the student was in clear violation of school policy and the search was necessary to maintain safety and order in the school;…
In the case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill”, the students’ expectation of privacy outweighs the obligation of the school leaders to maintain good order and discipline in that there is no clear and reasonable threat to student safety or order. The students’ constitutional rights should not be jeopardized over twenty dollars. Furthermore, a bathroom search of any students must be reasonable related to the objectives of the search and must not be excessively intrusive. Since there was only twenty-dollars involved this case, a bathroom search would be highly unconstitutional considering the age of the students and amount of money involved. This is evidenced by a similar case Safford vs. Redding 2008.…
First and foremost, irregular locker searches help to reduce violence and drug use in schools. Randomized locker searches help to find any weapons or drugs being hidden by student in lockers. THe searches can help to save lives, if there is a weapon found. If it is suspected that the student id breaking a law, or even school rule, a locker search may be carried out to see if the allegations are true.…
High school has its ups and downs. My goal is to help you with one of the downsides and give you an advantage over the average Joe. One of the most frequently used objects in high school is the locker. Some people are blessed with wonderful fully functional lockers, while others, like me, for the past two years have been cursed with damaged and unforgiving lockers. If you happen to be cursed like me, or just get in a fix every once in a while, this guide will help you impress you fellow locker mates by teaching you how to quickly and efficiently open your jammed locker and avoid any undesired tardiness. I have drawn out for you three different techniques to try and to master, depending on the situation.…
2. When should a school employee have the right to search you or your belongings?…
There have been 74 school shootings in the United States since the Sandy Hook shooting. This number is extremely high and causes heartbreak to our country; students deserve to attend school with no fear. Security guards and rules are not enough. Targeted bookbag and locker searches should be allowed because it would lower the amount of deaths and injuries in schools, lowers the amount of drug use in schools, brings a positive look to schools, and communities. Believing that these searches or maybe even metal detectors will help with the danger in schools today. According to Kate R. Ehlenberger, “Officials conduct random or blanket searches not because of individualized suspicion, but as a preventive measure. Examples of random searches include the use of metal detectors in school entrances and…
School officals need only reasonable suspicion to search…
Students could start purloin other people's possessions, start pickpocketing, and start going through other people's merchandise. All of this theft needs to be stopped and that is why locker searches are very imperative to our schools.…
Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…
What if you were a teacher and an armed intruder came into your school? How would you protect your students and yourself? If we allowed teachers to carry a firearm that is stored in a locked container a student would not be able to acquire the weapon, and only in emergency situations would the teacher be allowed to remove it from the container. If there was to be a situation where an intruder entered the school building the teacher would be able to protect themselves and the students. There should; however, be a…
The purpose of this paper is assess the limits search and seizure in public schools, apply specific ruling, analyze the New Jersey v. T.L.O. case and explain, recommend changes to existing (specific) laws to create a fairer educational setting in terms of search and seizure and peer review. School officials are responsible for providing a safe and orderly school environment. The officials are required to address disrupting or unsafe behavior that violate school policy and rules. It may require searching of students and their belongings. Dealing with disrupted behavior is a difficult situation that requires decision-making on when, where and how to conduct a search and seizure. My assess limit search and seizure is on hunch or just general search. School officials must have reasonable or proper cause to search.…
To them, it protects students rather then invading their privacy. Going through student's things doesn't ensure safety, it makes them not trust school authority. Others believe that students can't be trusted with bags in school. Again, this causes students to not trust advisors at school. If administrators want students to trust them, they shouldn't search their things without their permission. Limitations on student's Fourth Amendment rights are inexcusable.…
The lockers have been given to the students expecting them to take care of it and being responsible over it. What is the need to go through it? I have been given a locker since sixth grade and never once has a teacher much less a principle gone through my locker. If they were to go through my locker it would make me feel like i'm a suspect for something I have no connection with.On our way into school each day student’s book bags are checked each day. There have even been instances in which the security guards have taken over an hour to go through the student's belongings, while teachers, administrators and principals go through without being checked not only is it hypocritical but unjust. Teenagers should be given the benefit of the doubt. I have been present in an event where a teacher unjustifiably read his messages out loud after his phone rang in class without him even having it in his hands. It wasn't in the teacher’s responsibility nor authority to go through his messages much less reveal his messages.We are called the next generation yet we are restricted to are given liberty's by others insecurities. If people can't practice what they preach then they should change their speech. I would rather be considered a rebellious teenager than a lying hypocrite.Trust has become nothing but a blur and a silver lining with perseption, perseption is all that they can see in the end of the…
Teachers and administrators should be allowed to search students’ lockers because being able to search lockers creates a safer learning environment. According to opinions on the website “Debate.org”, 51% of the people who voted believe that teachers and administrators should be allowed to search lockers. Although searching students’ lockers may be against the fourth amendment ( “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable…