Preview

Pros And Cons Of Repeal The Second Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
648 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Repeal The Second Amendment
When our founding fathers were writing the Bill of Rights, they deemed it necessary to put into place an amendment that protected the common man. This amendment defends his right to self preservation, and helps deter a tyrannical government. In modern America, the second amendment is constantly under fire (pun intended). The liberal left seeks to take away the second amendment, whilst the conservative right seeks to strengthen it. These heated debates have sparked a lot of controversy, and arguments both for and against it. I think that the notion of repealing the second amendment is blasphemous, and that it is, in actuality, .the most important amendment, we have today because it allows citizens to protect themselves and their property, will dissuade any overstepping government or invasionary force, and it allows people to continue their varied lifestyles across the nation. …show more content…
Self defense ranges from killing a snake in your backyard, to stopping a mass shooting. These events happen daily in the United States, and because of the second amendment these threats can be neutralized. As an illustration of this, would an assailant willingly attack someone who they knew were well trained and armed? No, because even criminals enjoy living for the most part. The same could be said for a home invasion or a store robbery. It makes the perpetrator stop and think to himself, “Do I really want to die today?”. Without even using the firearm, a crime has been stopped. If that idea alone could be more common in today’s society, I believe that crime rates would plummet. If a populace can convince criminals that dying for a few dollars is never worth it, then they will have staunched the issue of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Bret Stephens, OP-ED article “Repeal the Second Amendment” he states the point that the Second Amendment needs to be repealed, just as the title insinuates. In the article, many points are brought from different standpoints are brought up and discussed, including a standpoint based on the law, one based on personal-safety, one on national-security, and another on the point of personal liberty. The first point that is mentioned is the standpoint based on law which states, that with a more prevalent appearance of guns there will be more murders. The stance on personal-safety mentions, that with more guns present there is a decrease in safety.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Second Amendment is unnecessary and should be repealed” a fair statement and one that I strongly agree with. The second amendment states that all man has the right to bear arms or own a gun. In July 4,1776 North America got its independence from the British Empire. Next our founding fathers came together and created the Bill of Rights. During the eighteenth century America was a young and newly independent country. In the 1770s they needed to demonstrate their strength as a country. Also, Americans were driven to protect their lands from countries that have a stronger government and army. But in this century,America is a stronger country with a very strong army and government. Considering that American now has a strong military with…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Kasich Pros And Cons

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (source 4). The second amendment is most important because it allows the people to intervene if the government is performing tyranny. If we the people were deprived of this right that means that we would be giving up our freedom to fight against…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment is all about your rights and how these are used in the world today. The "clear and present danger" test is a basic principle for deciding the limits of free speech. It was set by the famous Schenck v. the United States case from World War I. Anti War activist Charles Schenck was arrested for sending leaflets to prospective army draftees encouraging them to ignore their draft notices. The United States claimed that Schenck threatened national security, and the justices agreed. The principle was established that free speech would not be protected if an individual were a "clear and present danger" to United States security.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second amendment is our personal right to own and bear arms. People want to get rid of the second amendment because they blame guns for the crime rate and the murders and etc. There is a debate about keeping it or getting rid of it.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argumentative essay The second amendment has been the one of the most controversial topic in 2018. First the second amendment, what is it? Well, the second amendment states that people have the right to bear arms.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.…

    • 4325 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    THE EVOLUTION AND RESHAPING OF THE INCITEMENT OF VIOLENCE TESTS: TRANSITIONING FROM THE CLEAR AND PRESENT TEST IN SCHENCK TO THE IMMINENT LAWLESS ACTION TEST IN BRANDENBURG Introduction The First Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.”…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment states that all citizens have the right to bear arms, the first draft of this amendment, from James Madison, Federalist Papers No. 46. James Madison states that; “ A regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger.” .He also states , “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” What James Madison is basically saying is that citizens should have the right…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment guarantees “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press.” The freedom of speech, press, and religion have been pillars of the United States and other Democratic nations who knew the need to have these rights guaranteed. This idea was a major element of the Enlightenment period, the thoughts of John Locke, Jean Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Voltaire would be incorporated into the Constitution which included Freedom of Speech as a Human Right. Schenck v United States rules that the First Amendment stands for all speech as long as it doesn’t cause a “Clear and Present Danger.” No laws have been placed to decrease opinion.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has caused many debates throughout the years due to the different ways in which it could be interpreted. Most federal appeals courts have said that, when read as a whole, this amendment protects only the rights of the militia to bear arms. However, on a decision made on March 8, 2007, the majority focused on the second clause, saying that the amendment protects the rights of individual people to own firearms as well. The decision was made in a federal appeals court in Washington to strike down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that made it impossible for residents to keep handguns in their homes. The court ruled that banning the right to own firearms was a violation of the Second Amendment.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As opposed to gun control logic, gun rights advocates argue that 10 rounds of ammunition would not be sufficient in cases of self-defense. For example, if a victim is facing multiple attackers or faced with a threat behind a cover, the extra rounds can be crucial for the victim to survive. (Kopel, “The Costs and Consequences of Gun…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which is in the United States Constitution. The First Amendment basically states that the government may not interfere with our freedom of speech and the press, the right to a peaceful assembly, and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances (Bond and Smith, Pg. 132). With this Amendment it gives and protects our vocals as individuals and as a nation, so is there any backlash this brings? What good comes from this?…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2nd Amendment Advantages

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The right to bear arms is one of the most important freedoms we have as a country. The 2nd amendment right to bear arms is a constitutional right that provides an opportunity for Americans to protect themselves from both the powers of the government and from criminals, in this essay, the many benefits of the 2nd amendment right to bear arms will be reviewed.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays