Pros And Cons Of Rewilding North America

Brian
The issue for this week is very controversial, while both sides presented arguments that favor their idea of rewilding North America, the reality is that it will be very difficult to achieve. The primary reason for this idea to fail is the same one that occurred thousands of years ago “humans”. The level of development of North America will hinder the possibility for these organism to reach level similar to the Pleistocene levels. While similar experiments has been a complete success such as the reintroduction of the Gray Wolves at Yellowstone National Park, nevertheless other experiments has been a complete failure such as the introduction of one-humped camel (Camelus dromedaries) in Australia which have wreaked the desert ecosystems
The reality is that the current level of development of the nations that occupied North America will be the first obstacle in the re-introduction of bigger mammals. The reintroduction of many species worldwide has been in some areas a complete success and the opposite in others. Once an organism disappear from an ecosystem, it creates the opportunity for other organism to thrive and overtime nature takes his course and these organism adapt to the changes in their environment. While is not doubt that rewilding of North America will be beneficial for many species, it also will be the end for others, however nature will recover and adapt to these changes. The main obstacle for the rewilding of North America is the humans. Our current level of development, it will make this experiment almost impossible to achieve, especially for the bigger organism that can possess a treat to human life and for the live hood of many citizens. I believed that best solution for these dilemma is the protection of North America Biota and to encourage other nations to do the same. However, if a decision is made to begin the re-wilding of North America, the worst case scenario will be that we are no longer the top of the food