Firstly, seat belt use should not be mandatory because seatbelt campaigns spend millions of taxpayer dollars that could go toward funds for causes such as schools and charities.…
Primary seat belt laws allow law enforcement officers to ticket a driver or passenger for not wearing a seat belt, without any other traffic offense taking place. Secondary seat belt laws state that law enforcement officers may issue a ticket for not wearing a seat belt only when there is another citable traffic infraction. Montana is an example of a state who uses the set of Secondary seat belt laws, and although it has been proven somewhat useful, 20.7% of Montana’s population, which is approximately 196,000 people, are still not buckling up (Primary Seatbelt Law Factsheet). In 2011 alone, there was a reported 172 vehicle occupant deaths. Out of those 172 deaths, 127 people were not wearing seatbelts (Montana Living). That is a large statistical number and often gets written off as just that, a statistic. But most Montana towns are small, with a wholesome community-feel based environment. That is 127 individual deaths which affect whole communities. If there can be at least one person saved from wearing a seatbelt, it would be beneficial to a magnitude of people. Some people however still dare to think “I don’t need to wear a seatbelt,” or “that would never happen to me.” There are many myths about seatbelt use, and I am going to help relieve some of those…
Every Fourteen seconds someone is injured in a traffic accident in the United States alone. On average someone dies every thirteen minutes. In fact car crashes are the leading killer of Americans between the ages of three and thirty-three. If those people had been wearing a seatbelt the chances are they would have escaped serious injury or death. Have you ever thought about what the difference of wearing your seat belt could make? Or have you ever though if wearing your seat belt would make a different outcome? Wearing a seatbelt drastically increases ones chance of surviving a car crash. Seatbelts are the single most effective way of protecting ones self in a motor vehicle, yet despite the overwhelming evidence twenty-five percent of teens do not. Its time we enforce…
Thesis: Wearing a seatbelt should not be a law because citizens should have the freedom to drive without a seatbelt, as long as they are not putting someone else’s life in danger.…
Several sources were reviewed by the authors to establish the need for the study as well as to stress the importance of preventing the use of seat belt on newly admitted residents. The literature reviewed by the authors dates from the year 1997 to 2010 (Gulper et al., 2012). There are forty-two articles cited by the authors that discuss physical restraints (Gulper et al., 2012). All sources are relevant to the topic of either physical and chemical restraints or fall prevention. (Gulper et al.,2009). The citations within the paper are all referenced correctly.…
With only a fraction of the states in the United States enacting laws that require seatbelts on school buses, most of the 23.5 million children who commute on school buses do so without the safety of a seat belt. Seat belts should be required on all school buses, not just on smaller buses or specials needs buses. This additional safety measure must be available for all who travel in a school bus. Even though opponents to seat belts suggest that requiring them would be costly, and result in diminished seating capacity / bus availability on routes, an average cost of $1.50 per child per year is a small price to pay to ensure children 's safety. With the time that children spend on school buses during the school year, belts should be a requirement just as they are in passenger cars. Considering all the fatalities and injuries that have occurred, seat belts could have changed the…
Car accidents are the leading cause of death and injury in the United States of both adults and children. Seat belts were invented for the purpose to help reduce death and injuries. An airbag is not as effective if it was not for a seat belt. “In the United States, a mandatory seat belt law was first enacted in New York in 1984. Lund et al. [6] found a nine percent decline in traffic fatalities in the first nine months when New York enacted mandatory seat belt law.” (Dissanayake 32) There are two types of mandatory laws, Primary Seat Belt Law and Secondary Seat Belt Law. Depending on the child’s age and weight determines how they should be buckled in. “The lifetime medical cost of crash injuries was estimated to be $18.4 billion: $7.7 billion for treated and released patients and $10.7 for hospitalized patients.” (Bergen 895)…
Today in society it seems our government is taking away more and more of our rights. A law that I would like to discuss is the seat belt law. “New York was the first state to pass a law which required vehicle occupants to wear seat belts, a law that came into effect on Dec 1, 1984.”…
However, a uniform play a key role in getting reputation or success in the life of any persons or groups (Stevens, 1991).…
As you're driving down the highway you will most likely see "Click It Or Ticket" signs, and you may ask yourself, has the government gone too far with this law? People in America have the right to risk their own life by doing things such as rock climbing or bicycling without a helmet, the freedom to choose to wear a seatbelt is no different. Since the forming of our country our rights have become more and more regulated and the seatbelt law is only one example of this. You may want to ask yourself how many freedoms are you willing to loose before you object?…
New Hampshire along with all other states in the US enacted a policy mandating the use of child seats and seat belts for children under 18 years but has no provision in place for adults. The child passenger safety policy has evolved over the years with constant improvements and has been adopted by all states in America. The successful implementation of the child passenger policy into law mandating children below the age of 18 to be restrained in motor vehicles led to a 79% percent decrease in child motor vehicle fatality rate since 1975 (IIHSHLDI, 2016).…
In society today, seatbelts can either save someone’s life or take it away from them. Multiple people everyday in the United States die from not wearing a seatbelt while driving. People should wear seatbelts, not only is it the law, but it makes roads safer and it can save lives.…
Law enforcement jobs are to create, vary and enforce government regulations (Green, 2003). This clearly means that the government has a right and moreover a duty to enforce the law; in this case seat belt laws. Citizens should be compelled to obey, because it is the government’s duty, appointed to them by the citizens to enforce said laws. Yes, individuals will fight that they should have a right to choose if they want to wear a seat belt or not, but we live in a democratic society where as people, we vote for representatives to set laws of the land. If we lived in a lawless society then it would be the people (ultimately the strongest) who would determine right and wrong. If you look around the world there are many autocratic forms of…
I found many websites that are against the safety belt laws. One of the better websites was www.atch.com it is called Seatbelt Law Opposition Forum. The author, a William J. Holdorf states that some people have been more seriously injured and even killed only because of seat belt use. He also states that evidence of seat belt use increasing injuries or causing a person's death in certain kinds of traffic accidents is well documented in the hundreds of successful lawsuits filed against the auto makers since the advent of seat belt laws in 1985. Another good point that the author pointed out was the fact that there is a body of law that states a person has the right to refuse any personal health care device, drug, treatment, or surgery, even if such refusal might result in an earlier death or an increase in medical expenses. All seat belt laws, therefore, violate a person's right to freely choose to use or not to use a "health care" seat belt harness. Any medical professional attempting to do the same would be prosecuted, yet politicians claim they can ignore the law while demonstrating strict compliance from the private…
In 2001 the American Automobile Association reported that young children in the car were one of the leading causes of driver distraction crashes. Studies show that 60 percent of parents felt that driving alone with an infant in that backseat was “very distracting” while 80 percent of parents felt that it could cause an accident. One parent states “When I would lose patience…