Although similar, the two beliefs are not compatible because ethical egoism, in order to be significant, must claim that people can be altruistic; otherwise it would make no sense to say that people should be selfish.
Neither philosophy is very good, though. Both have very big problems. A major problem with psychological egoism is that in order for a person to feel good about doing something (e.g. giving money to the needy) they must actually care about something other than themselves. They must care about what they do if doing that makes them feel good. But if they care about their deed, this contradicts psychologcial egoism which claims that people only care about themselves.
Ethical egoism is just obviously absurd. The only way that it is even remotely plausible is when altruistic moral assumptions are smuggled in and covered up. Ayn Rand is famous for doing this. She claimed that people should be selfish, but at the same time people should not violate others' rights. But respecting the rights of others when violating those rights could benefit you is an altruistic act. Another big problem is that egoism is the same as racism or sexism - it gives unjustified preference to certain beings. Racists give undue moral preference to their race, sexists to their sex, and egoists to themselves. All three violate basic moral ideas about fairness.
Psychological egoism is calculated in a way that is unattainable to prove or disprove. Because psychological egoists claim that evident acts of altruism are merely the acts of persons seeking a good feeling or adhering to social incentives to be seen to be altruistic; which also provides a "good feeling". Since this good feeling is unattainable, or at least improbable to identify, let alone determine, it is unworkable to prove that all people encounter it every time they carry out altruistic deeds or actions.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
What is the primary information system in this area? How is it effective in performing its role? With what systems does it interrelate in receiving data or sending data?…
- 606 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
c. How does the theory of psychological egoism fit within your personal body of ethics and values?…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In our text, it defines psychological egoism as “Human conduct is selfishly motivated and we cannot perform actions from any other motive” (Fieser, Moseley, 2012, p 1.3). I personally disagree with this line of thinking. My values and ethics and values follow the pattern of treating people the same way you wish to be treated and being honest.…
- 360 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
c. How does the theory of psychological egoism fit within your personal body of ethics and values?…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
James Rachel writes about ethic egoism and psychological egoism and the comparison of the two. First it is important to understand the differences’ between the two of them. Ethic Egoism is the moral theory that states we ought to act only from self-love or by a standard view of how men should act. Psychological egoism, in contrast, is a view that all men are in fact selfish and everything that they do is selfish, and the only motive used for acts is in self-interest.…
- 165 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Ethical egoism is the view that every action is performed in order to maximize one’s own self-interest. Shoemaker argues, however, that in order for an ethical theory to be tenable it should be publicizable. He explains that ethical egoism should not be publicized, and is therefore implausible, because by working in their own best interest, ethical egoists will essentially eliminate the best outcome for themselves. When two ethical egoists act together in a way that is beneficial to themselves individually, as seen in the Prisoner’s Dilemma, their result is worse than if they had not acted to fully benefit themselves. Therefore, acting in their own self interests resulted in an outcome that actually wasn’t in their best interests. In other…
- 349 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Egoism and Altruism . Psychological egoism claims that whatever we do, we do out of self-interest. Give an example of an act you think is not done out of self-interest, and explain how the psychological egoist might try to interpret that act as selfish.…
- 715 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
What do you think of when you hear the word “egoist”? many view egoists as selfish and self-centered. In fact, a common synonym for selfish is “egotistic”. They think they only care about themselves. This may be true of some who are on the border of egoism and selfishness. However, those who are egoists but are not selfish barely deserve to be called that.…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Previously, I briefly gave a crude definition of Psychological Egoism, which I will now provide a more exhaustive explanation. Psychological Egoism is the assumed fact that the only actions people are capable of desiring and or pursuing are committed in their own self interest. Frequently, individuals appear to be acting unselfishly but in reality they are just taking these interest of others as means to promoting their own self-interest. This Alludes to the fact that an egoist believes that purely altruistic and benevolent actions do not exist. Psychological Egoism is often confused with Ethical Egoism. At first glance these two theories look very similar yet there is a major difference. Ethical egoism is the belief that all men ought to pursue their own desires and self-interest. The word “ought” in the previous sentence clearly portrays the difference of the two egoisms. A more precise sector of Psychological Egoism is hedonism. Hedonism is the belief that all individuals have one definitive motive in their own voluntary behavior, which is the desire for ones own pleasure and simultaneously avoiding unpleasant experiences. A Hedonist goal is to have the net gain of pleasure minus unpleasant experiences to be as high as possible. Another factor of Psychological Egoism is self-deception. This is the thought process…
- 1151 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Egoism is the act of behaving self-interestedly, and is perceived as a negative trait even though it can be seen as a tool of survival (Rosenstand, 2003: 131). However, there is an opposing theory, which is altruism. Altruism is defined as a concern for the welfare of others and is considered virtuous (Rosenstand, 2003: 150). We are often made aware of heroes who risk their lives for others and these heroes inspire many. We are encouraged to be altruistic, early in our lives. Nonetheless, one notices how altruist acts usually include rewards, even if it’s just a simple thank you. This leads to questions such as, does true altruism exist, or do people always have a motive as to why they perform altruistically?…
- 422 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Egoism—specifically ethical egoism—argues that our moral evaluations should be made in terms of our desires and goals. Something that promotes what I want is regarded as right; something that interferes with what I want, or prevents me from reaching my goals, is regarded as wrong.…
- 591 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Psychological egoism does not imply Ethical egoism. In fact they are two different things. Psychological egoism says that we DO always act selfishly and Ethical egoism says that we SHOULD act selfishly. Psychological egoism is the belief that people are only out for themselves all the time and just trying to be. Take for example an alcoholic, does this person drink and get drunk, act out, in pure self-interest or are they doing this selfishly, with no regards to others around them. He is doing what he wants, selfishly, but not in his self interests, this does not really benefit him to do so. Ethical egoism is more of a moral thing. We should we always do what we want regardless of how it will affect others or should we think about those consequences before acting. Ethically I would think twice about drinking cause while I may get pleasure out of the act and they high I am affecting others with my loud obnoxious behavior.…
- 273 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
People who following ethical egoism do and view things that are in their best interest. The real argument is to decide what really is in the best interest for someone that follows ethical egoism. It does seem in the person’s best interest for them to not go against the society because that could cause legal troubles. But it also may be in the person’s best interest to treat other with respect because they could lash out at them, attach or hurt them. I believe that a person following ethical egoism would choose not to follow the society and would not choose to be racist, sexist, classist and ageist because it is in their best interest not to be hurt. I believe if giving the choice people who follow ethical egoism would choose what is best for them at the given time, and not worry about things that could happen later. If given the choice of possibly placing their selves at harm by being racist, sexist, classist and ageist or going against the society I believe in most cases they would choose to go against the society. People with tent to pick the less of two evils when place in between a rock and a hard…
- 1086 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Egoism can be used to argue from both points of view. According to this theory, “an act is morally right if and only if it best promotes an agent’s interests” (Shaw & Barry, 2010 p59). Following this theory, if the employer drug tests several employees and fires all who test positive, then they are acting in their best interests. On the other hand, if the employee’s best interests are served through their drug usage, then the employee has acted in…
- 2040 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This suggests human moral choices should be made with only their own selfish interests at heart. If we do the best for ourselves, it will benefit others. The problem with this theory is that a person may have both selfish and good intentions when committing and act of kindness. Since ethical egoism only allows one option—self-interest, it is perpetuating flawed logic that would not hold up if reason is applied to the theory. Also, ethical egoism is an “arbitrary doctrine, in the same way that racism is arbitrary…” and it violates the “Principle of Equal Treatment”…
- 891 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays