Preview

Public Policy in Bangladesh

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3238 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Public Policy in Bangladesh
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
Increasing global competition is changing the environment facing most companies today. As trade barriers fall and transaction costs decline, new global competitors are entering previously more isolated domestic markets. In response to this intensified competitive pressure, local companies are pushed to enhance performance by innovating and adopting process and product improvements. This domestic sector dynamic leads to higher productivity, which, in turn, can create sustainable competitive advantages for companies, as well as being the most important driver of job creation and per-capita income growth for the economy (Baily et al., 2005). Higher productivity is the synonym of improved competitiveness. Enterprises are competitive when their productivity of labor and all production factors grow consistently, which situation allows them to reduce the unit costs of their output, etc., but also affect other enterprises at the national and international levels. Higher productivity provides funding for an organization’s expansion plans. In the short term, citizens benefit from the better and cheaper products available on the market, and in the medium term from growing employment. Another effect is constant growth in wages in real terms. As a result, a country’s living standard goes up when its productivity growth (in macro-terms) is sustained. Therefore, an enterprise plays the primary role in generating revenues and employment, and contributes to a lasting and balanced economic and social development (Wysokińska, 2003). 1.2 Conceptualization
Increasing global competition is changing the environment facing most companies today. As trade barriers fall and transaction costs decline, new global competitors are entering previously more isolated domestic markets. In response to this intensified competitive pressure, local companies are pushed to enhance performance by innovating and adopting process and product



References: Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction, Econometrica, vol. 2, pp. 323–351. Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P. and Vickers, J. (2001). Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 68, pp. 467–492. Brad,S. and D.B.A. (2003) Building Organizational Competencies for Competitive Advantages, Business Credit, 105 (2), 16-17. Baily, M.N., Farrell, D., Greenberg, E., Henrich, J.D., Jinjo, N., Jolles, M. and Remes, J.(2005). Increasing Global Competition and Labor Productivity: Lessons from the US Automotive Industry, Mckinsey Global Institute. Barseghyan, L. (2008). Entry Costs and Cross-Country Differences in Productivity and Output, Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 13, pp. 145–167. Carpinetti, L.C.R., Gerolamo, M.C. and Dorta, M. (2000). A Conceptual Framework for Deployment of Strategy-Related Continuous Improvements, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 12 No. 5, 340-9. Christopher, Martin (1998). Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service, Second-Edition, Financial Times Prentice Hall. Cincera, M., and Galgau, O. (2005). Impact of Market Entry and Exit on EU Productivity and Growth Performance, Economic Papers, no. 222, European Economy, European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Cole, H., Ohanian, L., Riascos, A. and Schmitz, J. (2005). Latin America in the Rearview Mirror, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 69–107. Fleury, A. and Fleury, M.T. 2003. Competitive strategies and core competencies: perspectives for the internationalization of industry in Brazil, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(1), 16-25 Goldman,L., Nagel, R Griffith, R. and Harrison, R. (2004). The Link Between Product Market Reform and Macroeconomic Performance, no. 209. Hayes, R.H. and Wheelwright, S.C. (1984). Restoring Our Competitive Edge, Competing Through Manufacturing, Wiley, New York, NY. Kaplan, D., Piedra, E. and Seira, E. (2007). Entry regulations and Business Sgtart-Ups: Evidence from Mexico, Policy Research Working Paper. Lau, R.S.M. (2002). Competitive Factors and Their Relative Importance in the US Electronics and Computer Industries, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (1), 125-35. Lee, Y.C. (2003). Total manufacturing information system: a conceptual model of a strategic tool for competitive advantage, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14/2,114-122. Leong, G.K., Snyder, D.L. and Ward, P.T. (1990). Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy, Omega, 18 (2), 109-122. Loayza, N., Oviedo, and Serven, L. (2002). The Role of Policy and Institutions for Productivity and Firm Dynamics: Evidence from Micro and Industry Data, Working Papers, NO. 329, OECD Economics Department. Madu, C. (1999). Reliability and Quality Interface, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 16:7, 691-698. Madu, C. (2000). Competing Through Maintenance Strategies, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 17:9, 937-948. Michael, P. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York. Nicoletti, G. and Scarpetta, S. (2003). Regulation, Productivity and Growth, Economic Policy, vol. 36, no. 18, pp. 11–72. Nickell, S. (1996). Competition and Corporate Performance, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 104, pp. 724–746. Ospina,S. and Schiffbauer, M (2010). Competition and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Firm-Level Data, Working Paper, WP/10/67, International Monetary Fund (IMF), IMF Institute. Phusavat, K Romer, P. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1002–1037. Syverson, C. (2011). What Determines Productivity?, Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326-365. Schiantarelli, F Srivastava, V. (1996). Liberalization, Productivity and Competition (Delhi: Oxford University Press). Schroeder, R.G., Anderso, J. C. and Cleveland, G. (1986). The Content of Manufacturing Strategy: An Empirical Study, Journal of Operations Management, 6 (4), 405-15. Wheelwright, S.C. (1984). Manufacturing Strategy: Defining the Missing Link, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, 77-91. Ward, P., Duray, G.K., Leong, G.K. and Sum, C. (1995). Business environment, operations strategy, and performance: an empirical study of Singapore manufacturers, Journal of Operations Management, 13, 99-115. Wysokińska, Z. (2003). Competitiveness and Its Relationships with Productivity and Sustainable Development, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, Vol. 11, No. 3 (42)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Egt 1 Task 309.1.3-06

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: McConnell, C., Brue, S., Flynn, S., & et al, S. (2011).Economics. (19e ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill%2FIrwin.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eco 561 Business Proposa;

    • 3681 Words
    • 15 Pages

    McConnell,C.R.. Brue,S.L. and Flynn, S.M. (2009) Economic: principles, problems and policies (18th ed.) Boston Ma. McGraw-Hill, Irwin pg. 224-233…

    • 3681 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hayes, Robert H., and Wheelwright, Steven C. (1984). Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing. New York: John Wiley.…

    • 2067 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rittenberg, L, & Tregarthen, T. (2009). 19.3. Keys to Economic Development. Principles of macroeconomics . Retrieved February 3, 2011, from http://www.web-books.com/eLibrary/NC/B0/B62/096MB62.html…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Porter's Diamond

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When we consider the Porter’s Diamond, the factor conditions in Brazil are numerous. “Porter theorizes that four broad attributes of a nation shape the environment in which local firms compete, and these attributes promote or impede the creation of competitive advantage. The attributes are factor endowments, demand conditions, relating and supporting industries, and firm strategy, structure, and rivalry” (Hill, 2011)…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Porters Diamond

    • 1671 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Porter’s Diamond Model (1990: 73 ) states that nation’s competiveness depends on the capacity of its industry to innovate and upgrade this however depends on the productivity level of the nation. From a company’s point of view a national competitive advantage means that it would have to depend on the nation to implement a home base to improve their existing products and services such as; technology, features, quality as well as being able to compete with international industries. Therefore, the advantage of this model is that it identifies the four factors that develop the essential national environment where companies are born, grow and as mentioned above sustain competitive advantage (Porter,1990:78). The idea of this model is useful because it allows organisations to carry out the necessary research and identify which countries would be good enough to internationalise.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Report: World Economic Forum

    • 266778 Words
    • 1068 Pages

    Beñat Bilbao-Osorio, Associate Director and Senior Economist, Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network, World Economic Forum Soumitra Dutta, Dean, Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University Bruno Lanvin, Executive Director, eLab, INSEAD…

    • 266778 Words
    • 1068 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    McGrath, M., & Gilmore, D. (1995). Achieving growth, competitive advantage and increased profits. World Class Design to Manufacture, 2(6), 11-16.…

    • 4368 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Little, I., Scitovsky, T. and Scott, M. (1970), Industry and Trade in some Developing Countries, Oxford University Press, London. Lockamy, A. and Cox, J. (1995), ``An empirical study of division and plant performance measurement systems in selected world class manufacturing firms: linkages for competitive advantage ' ', International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 221-36. MacCormack, A., Newman, L. and Rosenfield, D. (1994), ``The new dynamics of global manufacturing site location ' ', Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp. 69-80. Mahoney, D., Trigg, M., Griffin, R. and Pustay, M. (1998), International Business: A Managerial Perspective, Longman, Melbourne. Markides, C. and Berg, N. (1988), ``Manufacturing offshore is bad business ' ', Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66 No. 5, pp. 113-20. Marquardt, M. (1999), The Global Advantage: How World-class Organizations Improve Performance Through Globalization, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX. Michaely, M. (1977), ``Exports and growth: an empirical investigation ' ', Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 49-53. Quinn, J. and Hilmer, F. (1994), ``Strategic outsourcing ' ', Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp. 43-55. Textiles, Clothing and Footwear Development Authority (1990), State of the Industry Report, Australian Government Publishing Service, Brunswick. Tuckey, B. (1996a), ``Car chiefs warn on imports ' ', The Age, 9 February. Tuckey, B. (1996b), ``Report rejects level playing field ' ', Business Review Weekly, 22 July. Wheelwright, S. (1984), ``Manufacturing strategy: defining the missing link ' ', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 77-91.…

    • 9501 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Porter and his research team studied ten important trading nations, including the three leading industrial powers (the United States, Japan, and Germany), plus other European and Asian countries chosen to vary widely in size, government policy toward industry, social philosophy, geography, and region. In every case, firms were found to be internationally competitive because of a set of conditions in the home country favorable to the development of their industry.…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alamo Drafthouse

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Manufacturing strategy is viewed as the effective use of manufacturing strengths as a competitive weapon for the achievement of business and corporate goals”…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is evidence that the differences in total productivity among countries - differences that originate in different levels of technology - explain more than 60 percent of the differences among these countries in per-worker income and growth rates. Although growth has its ups and downs in the course of the economic cycle, the average growth rate of the global economy has been accelerating over time. By inference, the rate of increase in technological level in…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manufacturing Strategy

    • 2840 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Manufacturing strategy examines strategy for manufacturing and operations within the firm. The course will examine how manufacturing and operations can be used as competitive weapons. Traditionally, these areas have been viewed as narrow, functional areas, and management of them was based on some simple criterion such as cost minimization. In recent years, managers and business observers have understood that manufacturing and operations have to be managed in the broader context of business strategy. In this sense, decisions on manufacturing capabilities must fit and be consistent with the business strategy. Furthermore, decisions about different areas of manufacturing must be consistent with each other. Choices about facilities, capacity, vertical integration, process technology, control and information systems, sourcing, human resources, organization and other areas are all strategic choices that significantly affect what the business brings to the marketplace. The course will examine how decisions in these areas can be made in a coherent manner. We will also explore operations in general and not just in a manufacturing environment.…

    • 2840 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brightpoint

    • 2631 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Mangan, J, Lalwani, C, Butcher, Tim, Javadpour, Roya (2012): Global Logistics & Supply Chain Management, 2nd edition, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd…

    • 2631 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mrs Anthony

    • 11039 Words
    • 45 Pages

    The focus of this article is to clarify the meaning of international competitiveness at the country level within in the context of Porter’s (1990a) thesis that countries, like companies, compete in international markets for their fair share of the world markets. At a country level, there are two schools of thought on country competitiveness: the economic school, which rejects Porter’s notion of country competitiveness, and the management school, which supports the notion of competitiveness at a country level. This article reviews and contrasts the theories pertaining to these two schools of thought with specific reference to trade theories and the ‘theory’ of the competitive advantage of nations originally advanced by Porter (1990a, 1997a, 1998b, 1998c, 2000). Although Porter’s Diamond Framework has been extensively discussed in the management literature, its actual contribution to the body of knowledge in the economic and management literature has never been clarified. The purpose of this article is to explain why Porter’s Diamond Framework is not a new theory that explains the competitiveness of countries but rather a framework that enhances our understanding of the international competitiveness of firms. Key words: Porter, Diamond Framework, international competition, competitiveness of countries, international business, national competitive advantage, country sources of competitive advantage…

    • 11039 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Good Essays