Preview

Public Surveillance Impinging on Our Privacy and Assist for Crime Prevention

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1607 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Public Surveillance Impinging on Our Privacy and Assist for Crime Prevention
PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE IMPINGING ON OUR PRIVACY AND ASSIST FOR CRIME PREVENTION

In the modern world there have been a lot of technological advances within societies. Technology concerns about security and surveillance has changed the thoughts of people. This surveillance technology consist of spying video cameras, CCTV security and surveillance cameras, surveillance electronic communications, face recognition and many others. Some people think this technology is okay while others carry a different view. These people feel that it is an invasion of privacy, especially when it is in a public place. Use of surveillance technology are impinging on our privacy as they are affecting student moral, privacy at workplace, behavior of people, life style and are susceptible to abuse or misuse surveillance data. The evidence supporting this argument is ways that technology is abused, privacy for employees, women, and students as public moral right and many others.
There are five ways that surveillance-camera systems are likely to be misused: first is criminal abuse, in 1997, a police official of Washington DC was caught using police database to gather information on patrons of gay club. They trapped the plate number of vehicle that was parked at lot of the club and found the background and the owner of that vehicle through camera surveillance and he blackmailed patrons who were married. This is how this CCTV surveillance is misused and there are many more such critical things happening in USA and UK. Second is institutional abuse, during civil rights movements and Vietnam War there was a lot of illegal use of CCTV and other sources of surveillance by FBI and many individual police to harass political activities who were involved in racial segregation and Vietnam War. Computerized information is very easy to hack for police and easily can be misused. Third is the abuse for personal purpose, by Detroit free press there is many police in USA caught leaking database. A database

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Privacy is the state of being free from intrusion in one’s personal life, or so it used to be. In Simson Garfinkel’s article “Privacy Under Attack” he discusses how technology has invaded people’s privacies over the years and continues to do so. From telephone systems and mail to car computers and surveillance cameras.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Surveillance is a feature used by the modern government. Surveillance is supposedly used by the government for preventing /investigating crimes and gathering information, however it can also be used by criminal organisations for planning and committing crimes, which is ironic. Technology allows the government to track online activities, people’s movements and communications. Most people would consider surveillance a breach of privacy and it is opposed by numerous activist groups since most authoritarian governments don’t have any domestic restrictions, which means that governments are allowed to access your information whenever they choose without relevant justification. George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty Four” warn of the negative effects of surveillance and how the government can use it to control people. It is believed if…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of police body cameras is very controversial. When the looking at the big picture, the cameras are beneficial because of the general positive influence it has on both sides of the police- civilian interaction. There might be slight concerns about the privacy of the public but there is substantial proof that the police body cameras have an overall positive affect on…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Rivalry In Texas

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If you’re from Texas, then you are aware of how huge this state really is. Texas happens to be home to three of the top ten largest cities in the country. According to the 2010 US Census, Houston weighs in at number four; San Antonio at number eight; and Dallas at number nine. These big cities being in such close proximity to one another can lead to even bigger rivalries. Dallas, Texas vs. Houston, Texas is a tale as old as time. However, what’s interesting is that a lot of Texans aren’t even sure why this rivalry exists in the first place and how it’s still going so strong. Well, there are a couple of major factors that play a part in this unique rivalry. There’s the big sports rivalries, pop culture differences and similarities, differences…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Congressional Digest, 94(10), 8. Sun-ha, H. (2017). Criticizing surveillance and surveillance critique: Why privacy and humanism are necessary but insufficient. Surveillance & Society.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We currently live in a world that surveillance camera are used almost everywhere, at homes and businesses, airports, etc. They are also used by law enforcement to conduct investigation. Since the 2001 terrorist attack, cameras have increased (Surette, 2015). One of the issues with surveillance camera that many individuals bring up is that it violates their privacy. Expectation of privacy is one of the many things that the public is concern. Surveillance cameras should be acceptable and it should not matter whether they are hidden or openly displayed if there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. For example, any person that step foot outside of their home and go to the store, or on the road, or to any business open to the public should be…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world use social media sites. However, many do not realize that governments are able to use surveillance programs to spy on them. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, surveillance is the close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal and it can be defined as processes of information collection and processing. Surveillance on social media has its positives and negatives and people should know how to use it responsibly, critically and effectively. Surveillance programs endanger the privacy of each Internet user. The reason that surveillance is accepted is because it can help governments find terrorists and can help solve crimes. However, it is a concern for multiple people that there is no law or regulation on how governments are able to use the programs. Moreover, the surveillance programs are sold off the shelf to governments so…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    but body cameras can be a bad idea on some occasions because if a person is being arrested and spot the camera it can cause the person to go insane and start doing/saying things that can hurt the police and him/her.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    concerns with the camera is the privacy and security (Hermann and Weiner). Privacy towards the…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many Americans that worry about the invasion of their privacy. An American’s privacy can be lost by- an IP address internet cookies, government surveillance cameras, and social networking sites. There are many ways Americans can control their privacy, but sometimes the invasion of privacy is out of their control. For example, computers save all of the American’s private information without their consent.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Police body cameras do raise some substantial privacy issues. The nature of police work has officers interacting with citizens during their most vulnerable moments. For example, most people would not be comfortable knowing that anyone could request a video of an incident that happened in their home. Or footage of them at a scene of a crime.” (Erstad). Some people believe that body cameras worn by police officers are an invasion of privacy; however, they will benefit citizens just as much as they will the law enforcement. “Although it may seem like the positive effects of having the police wear body cameras outweighs any negative effects, there is another side. If the police are recording everything are they encroaching on personal privacy? Many people would say yes. What if a potential suspect does not want to be recorded? Is the recording infringing on his rights? During an arrest, police cannot turn off the camera, so the suspect will be recorded whether or not he agrees” (Dimoff). Invading privacy to save someone's life is important. If there is one piece of evidence from a body camera that could save someone from getting the death penalty encroaching on someone's privacy is worth it. “While mounted police cameras can’t pick up on absolutely everything an officer sees, the video obtained from these cameras can help paint a much clearer picture of what…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only way this technology can be utilitarian is after the crime has taken place so the police can try to find the suspect. Amanda Alvarez, a write, editor, and a college instructor, explains in her article the reason why these cameras are not ready to be used. She states, “ Hair, hats, sunglasses, and facial expressions can throw off automated recognition” (Alvarez). Even though these cameras are “able” to recognize certain faces, sometimes they fail, and the police end up arresting the wrong person. In addition, Ms. Kelly states, “But it 's still not clear whether they are effective at preventing crimes” (“After Boston”). Even though the technology on these cameras has work to capture criminals, they still are not able to prevent crime, and sometimes, they can cause an unnecessary arrest. This means that these cameras function the same way as a normal camera would. Congress should pass a law that bans this technology until the cameras are able to guarantee success 100% of the time. Instead of installing expensive cameras with face- and object-recognition technology, cities can have normal cameras installed, so the police will not arrest an innocent…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of living in a surveillance society with no fear as long as individuals have nothing to hide sounds ideal; but even if people are not guilty of committing a crime, there are a number of reasons why loss of privacy should concern them. A significant concern is that the…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Privacy Issues

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Police officers argue that body cameras can deal with privacy issues. Privacy won’t become an issue if some of the police officers actually did their job right. Many of the police departments have been denying to wear body cameras because cameras may prevent people from coming forward as credible witnesses to help assist with investigations, due to fear of public exposure and the fear of someone coming after them to kill them. Technological issues related to the cameras may prevent proper functioning at times and the cops are not able to fix them because they don’t know much about technology. This could be due to a dead battery, damaged components, obstructed lens, and other problems. This could result in personnel missing important witness statements or crucial behavior by officers or citizens. The equipment is expensive as well. Some police departments don’t have the money to buy expensive cameras. The cameras the cops need have to have a lot of storage in them. Plus, cameras need to have long-term batteries so that it won’t die out while on duty. Yes,…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you have got nothing to hide, why are you scared? This is one of the main arguments supporting government surveillance. But if you went out and found someone snooping through your bin, would you say, “Oh, it’s okay, I have got nothing to hide”? Of course not! Would you be comfortable telling all the people in the near vicinity all the information that the government is going to see with the surveillance programme, even if you have got nothing to hide? Of course not!…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays