Preview

Punic War: Rivalry Between Carthege And Rome

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Punic War: Rivalry Between Carthege And Rome
Rivalry between Carthege and Rome after several defeats to Rome especially the lost of first Punic war to Rome. Hannibal was determined to revenge for his father. Cartheginian put their trust in him. Hannibal had promised his father in response to his Father’s request to hate Rome till death.

The second Punic war was battle between carthage , Hannibal and Rome. The war saw massive destruction of Roman army in the hands of a great commandant Hannibal. He Hannibal had early Victory over the Rome, which saw destruction of many Romans. This does not deter Romans as they regrouped and raised new armies. Hannibal destroyed several thousands of Roman army, but the Romans were still courageous and ready to defend their Fatherland. At the battle
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did The Abigail Break The Treaty Of Hannibal
    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Abigail Break The Treaty Of Hannibal

    Furthermore, they most likely did not have the power or the military force to stop Hannibal had they wanted to do so. Moreover, should they choose to confront Hannibal, they most likely would lose all their economic gains in Spain after the First War. By fighting Rome, they were protecting their interests. A common misconception portrays Hannibal as the sole protagonist against the Romans, but the Carthaginian government also involved themselves in the conflict. Although they did not do as much as Hannibal during the war, the senate still helped in the war. Yet again, the Barcid faction triumphed over the impotent Hannonite…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Silent Death Of Fog: The Battle Of Lake Trasimene
    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Silent Death Of Fog: The Battle Of Lake Trasimene

    From a snapshot of the Second Punic War, the Carthaginians defeated the Romans while under the consul of Gaius Flaminius. The battle is considered one of the largest and most successful ambushes in military history. The battle consisted of around 50,000 Carthaginian soldiers versus about 30,000 Roman soldiers. The aftermath of the battle produced well over 15,000+ lost soldiers for the Roman army while Hannibal only lost approximately 2,500 of his own. Despite the overview of the battle, much more can be examined when looking at the events leading up to the brilliant ambush set by…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Delian League Research Paper
    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Delian League Research Paper

    The Punic Wars were three conflicts between Carthage and Rome. The first conflict was from 264-241 B.C. It grew out of an altercation between Messana and Syracuse. The Messanians asked Carthage for help and Syracuse asked Rome for help. The Strait of Messana, which separated the Italian Peninsula from Sicily, was important strategically, and both Carthage and Rome responded. The Punic army (Carthaginians) arrived in Sicily and mediated peace between the two and established a military base. When the Roman army arrived, they drove off the Punic army from the military base and war ensued (Columbia…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Punic War: The Battle Of Cannae
    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages

    2nd Punic War: The Battle Of Cannae

    One general, wreaking havoc throughout the Roman lands was known as Hannibal Barca. Following in his father’s footsteps as a superior military general, he challenged Rome in battle every chance he could. After several attempts of coaxing Rome into battle he achieves a decent victory at the Battle of Trasimene in 217…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Third Punic Wars: Clash Between Romans And The Carthaginians
    • 4407 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Third Punic Wars: Clash Between Romans And The Carthaginians

    By 246 BCE, the Carthaginians controlled the trade routes and maritime trade in the Mediterranean. The Rome Republic was founded in 509 BCE as a result of an overthrow of Tarquinius Superbus, King of Rome. By 246 BCE, Rome, a small city, was unable to trade in the Mediterranean, only the Tiber River, but it dominated the Italian Peninsula, and only had access to the Italian Peninsula. However, Rome was growing stronger. The Punic Wars were fought to determine who controlled the trade in the…

    • 4407 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Second Punic War Hannibal Research Paper
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Second Punic War Hannibal Research Paper

    While the Carthaginian government make some valid points in their explanation of the blame for the Second Punic War Hannibal. Both they and Hannibal can be seen to share the responsibility for Carthage’s defeat in the Second Punic War. Hannibal’s quixotic plot to attack Rome without a veritable intention to destroy her left Carthage stranded in a war that would ultimately turn against her. However, the circumstances and misfortunes faced in a war on foreign soil against the might of Rome can at times be seen as beyond Hannibal’s control.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Rome And Carthage
    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Rome And Carthage

    Rome rule its people in a very organize and civil manner, which draws loyalty among its citizens. Rome has an effective and distinct way in managing people, particularly to the inhabitants of their newly acquired lands and territories. One of the best example was the Latins in Latium, whose devotion and loyalty were exceedingly commendable, especially during the Second Punic War, where they fought valiantly--along with the Romans --against the forces of Hannibal. On other hand, Carthage "great advantage" was they have a "permanent able leader," that command its military forces. Unlike Rome, the order of its military resides in the hands of its civil magistrates, who were constantly replaced…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical THinking
    • 958 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Critical THinking

    During the Punic Wars, Rome made an effort to take over Italy(most importantly Sicily). Although they had a land power advantage, they realized they could not win without a navy. The Roman navy eventually defeated the Carthaginian navy, and won the first Punic War. Sicily became the first Roman province as a result. Eventually, Carthage retaliated, and with the help of general Hannibal, almost retook all of Rome's provinces. However, Rome fought back and won the Second Punic War. After the Battle of Zama(202 B.C.E), Carthage signed a peace treaty and lost Spain. Fifty years later, the third and final Punic War defeated Carthage once and for all (which was advocated by the politician Cato). This marked the beginning of the great Roman Republic and Empire.…

    • 958 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why The Battles Of Hannibal, Baal, And Rome
    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why The Battles Of Hannibal, Baal, And Rome

    Hannibal Barca was one of the greatest Generals of his time. Although his abilities at developing battle strategies were unequaled in his day, the driving forces behind his successes as a general, were not only his superior military ability, but also his feelings of hostility toward the Romans. Because of his ability to plan and organize military campaigns he was able to succeed in crossing thousands of troops across the Alps to invade Italy. Hannibal, son of General Hamilcar Barca, showed hostility toward the Romans due to the fact that he had been indoctrinated in the theology of the Carthaginian god Baal. This indoctrination along with the fact that Rome and Carthage were enemies only served to fuel his hostility and aggression.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad
    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved most of Caesar's qualities. He was a good and popular leader and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a problem with Caesar and plotted to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil war between the Romans. This war may have been prevented if Brutus and Cassius had done things a little differently. Cassius would have made a better leader rather than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did not have the morals of a killer like Caesar did.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Romans Continue Overseas Expansion Of Rome
    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did The Romans Continue Overseas Expansion Of Rome

    The Second Punic War was a major turning point for Rome and its continued overseas expansion. The Romans drove the Carthaginians out of Spain, and then attacked Carthage itself. The Romans, led by Scipio Africanus, defeated the Carthaginians,…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Frederick Douglass 'And' Malala Yousafzai, The Fighter
    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparing Frederick Douglass 'And' Malala Yousafzai, The Fighter

    He defeated the Carthaginians led by the legendary general, Hannibal at the northern city of Zama in Africa. By doing so, he ended the nearly 20 year old war. In this battle, the Romans were numerically deficient in infantry but where outnumbered in cavalry. After an extended skirmish between Rome and the Carthaginians, the light infantry and the mix of light infantry and war elephants deployed by Hannibal, and cause the man formations of the 2 sides to meet. Hannibal sends his army in echelon formation to envelop the roman flanks but ends up loosing the battle. The Battle of Zama was the last and decisive victory to the second Punic war. Zama was one of the three wars between Carthage and Rome and resulted in the destruction of Carthage and is annexed by Rome. A modern but similar battle to Zama was the Battle of Waterloo. Napoleon, another legendary general, led the French to battle against the English and their allies. Although Napoleon had a great reputation, Wellington, the general of the European side, proved to have more intelligence when he outsmarts Napoleon's plan and defeats the French. Both battles saw the final defeat of a famed and "invincible" military leader, Hannibal at Zama and Napoleon at Waterloo. Also, both battles were decisive battles in that they ultimately end the great wars. The Battle of Zama ended the 2nd Punic war and the Battle of Waterloo ended the Napoleonic wars. All in…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Third Mithridatic War: The Roman Republic
    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Third Mithridatic War: The Roman Republic

    The Third Mithridatic war (75-63 B.C.) was the last and longest of a series of conflicts involving the Roman Republic and other regional powers. The long fought war eventually led to a total victory for the Republic, with the Pontic Kingdom who was the belligerent in the previous wars, coming to an end. The Third war was triggered by the death of the ruler of Nicomedes IV, the King of Bithynia.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Punic Wars
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Punic Wars

    gave them the advantage in the first war, although they suffered a large loss at the battle…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Charles Dickens Contribute To A Christmas Carol
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Charles Dickens Contribute To A Christmas Carol

    “The pain of parting is nothing to the joy of meeting again.” This is a quote by Charles Dickens, a timeless author who wrote memorable stories. Dickens had a life full of travel and had a few different homes. He made many contributions to literature with his classic books. One book was the beloved story, A Christmas Carol, where Dickens used character development to change a character’s view on Christmas. Charles Dickens was, and still is, one of the best authors of all time.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More