Preview

Punishment and Sentencing Paper

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1267 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Punishment and Sentencing Paper
Punishment and Sentencing Paper
CJA/224
Garrett LeGrange
September 17, 2010

There are many different philosophies that are in use in the court systems when determining what sort of punishment will be imposed on someone who is found guilty of committing a crime. These philosophies are in use in both the adult courts and juvenile courts. The juvenile court system is similar to the adult courts, but there are many differences between the two. Both court systems try and keep crime from happening and both courts sentence those found guilty to some sort of punishment through the punishment philosophy that the court determines is a suitable approach for preventing future crime. Deterrence is the first punishment philosophy. Deterrence is the philosophy that if fear of punishment for committing crimes is present, then crimes are less likely to be committed. Deterrence in today's society is more for police and their presence in the community to prevent or slow down crime. The idea of deterrence also can be helped through punishment of crimes to be carried out swiftly and being a punishment that will make others think twice before committing the same crime. With the philosophy of deterrence, people are going to be less likely to commit a crime if they are more than likely going to be caught committing the crime, and they will be punished for committing the crime. The adult court systems rely on deterrence to come from punishments people found guilty are sentenced to. Punishments should fit the crime and when punishments are severe, most people will reconsider committing the same crime in fear that incarceration will result. Juvenile courts use the threat of punishment as a deterrent for minors that commit crimes. Rehabilitation is another punishment philosophy. In this philosophy, people that are found guilty of committing crimes might need to have a change in behavior to prevent a person from committing future crimes. Under this philosophy people who commit



References: Meyer, J. and Grant, D. (2003). The Courts in our Criminal Justice System. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall http://www.suite101.com/content/the-philosophies-of-punishment-a199184 Hodgkinson, P., and Rutherford, A. (1996) Capital Punishment, Global Issues and Prospects, (Waterside Press). Honderich, T. (1971) Punishment The Supposed Justifications, (Pelican Books). Hudson, B. (1987) Justice Through Punishment: A Critique of The Justice Mode of Corrections, (MacMillan Education Ltd). Zedner, L. (2004) Criminal Justice, Clarendon Law Series, (Oxford University Press). Honderich, T. (1971) Punishment The Supposed Justifications, (Pelican Books). Hudson, B. (1987) Justice Through Punishment: A Critique of The Justice Mode of Corrections, (MacMillan Education Ltd). Zedner, L. (2004) Criminal Justice, Clarendon Law Series, (Oxford University Press). Honderich, T. (1971) Punishment The Supposed Justifications, (Pelican Books). Hudson, B. (1987) Justice Through Punishment: A Critique of The Justice Mode of Corrections, (MacMillan Education Ltd). Zedner, L. (2004) Criminal Justice, Clarendon Law Series, (Oxford University Press).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joe Cinque - Law

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The justice system is divided between providing a punishment or a rehabilitation sentence. Varied opinions are voiced throughout the novel, yet the court system…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 5 of the textbook, the author examines retributive justice from the standpoint of the means of punishment (Section 5.2). He calls attention to the length of prison sentences and, in particular, the issue of mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Meyer, J.F., & Grant, D.R. (2003). The courts in our criminal justice system. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargaining is a process of negotiation and resolution that is an efficient, informal and by and large, successful alternative to the formal process of a criminal trial. Despite this less formal approach, the goal that drives plea bargaining is exactly the same: to bring about a fair, balanced and just resolution to an act of wrongdoing (Larson, 2000). In this regard, the use of plea bargaining is not only beneficial to all concerned in the judicial process; but may be preferable to a formal trial.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: CJi Interactive Learning Modules. (2012, Spring). Chapter 12: Correction in the Community. Retrieved from http://media.pearsoncmg.com/pcp/pcp_94869_mutchnick_cj_uop/learning _modules/chapter12/12.4historyof parole/index.html…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The complexities of human nature, emotions, thought, morals and ethics have been debated for centuries, and the dilemma of sentencing another human to a form of corporal punishment, incarceration or death, requires a firm foundation in the laws of the land, tempered by years of study and dedication to the law one has sworn to uphold. The several reasons for sentencing of a crime is: Revenge, for an actual or perceived need for vengeance on a violation, usually one that is very personal and emotional in nature. Incapacitation, which is to prevent the criminal from repeating crimes against society by placing them into a correctional facility on a long term or permanent basis. Restoration, is a form of sentencing when the convening authority is attempting to protect the victims by helping them to feel safe and secure. Deterrence is a sentence where the courts attempt to prevent the subject of a crime from offending again. Retribution, which is probably the oldest reason for sentencing was utilized for equal punishment to the crime, drawing from the old adage “eye for an eye”. Lastly is the sentence of rehabilitation, which in societies modern view, the ideal and preferred sentence,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, Incapacitation, and Rehabilitation. Retribution is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered. It relies on the principle of just deserts, which holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion of the severity of the crime. Deterrence is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender, so rather than seeking only to punish the offender this strategy is to try to sentence to prevent future crimes along with incapacitation and rehabilitation. Incapacitation is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal behavior activity. There are three steps to help determining sentencing. When public opinions move toward more severe strategies of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, legislatures have responded by asserting their power of over determining sentencing guidelines. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    institutional racism

    • 3087 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Easton, S & Piper, C (2005) Sentencing and Punishment, The Quest for Justice, Oxford University Press, Hampshire…

    • 3087 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories regarding Punishment and Rehabilitation have evolved with the civilization of man. There was a time in history when the rights of the accused were not considered when rendering punishments. Rehabilitation for offenders was unheard of. ( Katz & Walker,2008) noted “A tradition of vigilantism persisted well into the twentieth century and represented some of the worst aspects of American criminal justice. People just killed others whom they did not like, or mobs would drive them out of town. The lynching of African Americans was used to maintain the system of racial segregation in the South”. An offender was totally without rights and at the mercy of only his accusers.…

    • 2858 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is being overlooked is that restorative justice responses often contain retributive and punitive elements themselves – and sometimes, such as in serious cases, necessarily so. (Barton 1999, Ch. 10) Therefore, blaming retribution, or even punitiveness, for the ills of the criminal justice system is largely beside the point. Punishment and retribution cannot be ruled out by any system of justice. By implication, a more plausible critique of the status quo is…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophies

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are; retribution, this philosophy is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered, deterrence, this strategy is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender. Incapacitate is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The only way that we’re going to feel secure in this country again and that we’re going to feel good about ourselves is if we use these systems we’ve put into place to create positive change around the world. I really believe we can do that”(John Perkins). Sentencing and corrections have changed over the years. Before, the criminal justice system believed prison sentences were the only way to rehabilitate criminals, when in fact, it did the exact opposite. The judicial system began to see that the solutions they applied were not beneficial to the inmates.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Delfino, M. & Day, Mary E. (2007). Death Penalty USA 2005 – 2006. Tampa, Florida: Better MoBetter Publishing. Retrieved from: http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=3086135123&searchurl…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty is a subject of much debate amongst the American people. Some people support capital punishment while others do not. Examination of sources and analyses of important history regarding the death penalty will hopefully add to the understanding of why it is so important in our day and age to have such a penalty to deter and deal with the most violent of offenders in our modern day society. A major influence on my position is my uncle being murdered when I was younger. The points I use to support my argument for being Pro Death Penalty are the history of the death penalty, the death penalty as a deterrent, cost comparison between the sentences of life and death, and is victim’s justice served. Knowledge of this personal influence, and the points mentioned above adds to the understanding of being Pro Death.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays