Qualitative Leadership In Macbeth

Andrew Carnegie once said, “No man will make a great leader who wants to do it all himself or get all the credit for doing it.” Teamwork is the key component to achieving something great, if a leader wants to be great, his team must also be great. Ruling and dictating as one individual never leads to positive results. Authoritative leadership is less effective than collaborative leadership because fear and power create anarchy and dissent, while respect and decency create a harmonious society. This claim can be supported by Confucius, Machiavelli, Plato and Macbeth.

Primarily, authoritative leadership creates anarchy and dissent through the use of fear and power. The play, Macbeth, provides a prime example of authoritative leadership
If the proper people are brought together, then more authentic and stronger outcomes will arise. Source D clearly portrays the needed qualities in being a leader. It states, “Managing people can be as challenging as it is rewarding, and it is similar to parenting in that both need to guide, teach, encourage, discipline, complement and provide the atmosphere needed for their team or family members to be successful,” (Forbes). One must lead the way they want to be followed. Similarly, Hobbes believes that people place their trust into the one person that would take care of their safety. He explained that people will follow people would would insure, “peace at home, and mutual aid against their enemies abroad” (Hobbes). This idea supports collaborative leadership by describing how strong leadership comes only through conversation and shared ideas. Collaborative leadership generates a more compatible society by being admirable and respectable.

On the contrary, some may think that authoritative leader is more effective than collaborative leadership, but they are wrong. Collaborative leadership is more effective because it is impossible for one person to represent everyone's opinions and fear only drives people