Preview

Questions on the New Model Army and the Battle of Naseby

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
397 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Questions on the New Model Army and the Battle of Naseby
What was the New Model Army and how was it different to earlier armies?

The New Model Army was created by Parliament in February 1645. This army was a military force based on a person's ability rather than position in society. One of the leading officers in the New Model Army had been a butcher. This removal of social obstacle meant that the New Model Army was open to new ideas as social class meant nothing. It was a force based mainly on lightly armed cavalry. These cavalry soldiers wore thick leather jerkins for protection as full plated armours would slow down their horses. The horses were the key to the success of the New Model Army as their attacks were based on speed, so they could surprise the enemy. The New Model Army also meant a change in tactics they now decided to attack from the sides- to avoid artillery and muskets, which were hard to handle.

Why did Charles I move out of Oxford just prior to the Battle of Naseby?

In May 1645 Parliaments army besiege Oxford (the King's wartime capital). Initially, Charles welcomed this move as the army would not be able to interfere with his move north. Then at the end of May he was told that Oxford was short of provisions and that it could not hold out long. So on the 31st of May, just before (2 weeks) the Battle of Naseby, Charles left Oxford. Royalists stormed the Parliamentary garrison at Leicester to distract Fairfax who was controlling the army. After this Charles' army marched south to relieve Oxford.

Why did Parliament's army win the Battle of Naseby?

Parliament won the battle because they outnumbered the Royalists by 19,000 to 9,000. Parliamentarians walked all the way around the royalists to attack the other half of the land. This took the royalists by surprise and they were not completely prepared. Oliver Cromwell devised a plan to outsmart the royalists. He placed the New Model Army on a slant hill so the Royalists failed because if they came up it would be suicidal. He

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oliver Cromwell: military leader of the Parliamentary side in the English Civil war, served as Lord Protector after the parliamentarians won.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the British referred to the Continental Army as a “rabble in arms” (McCullough 25), the author carefully paints his story to show how the colonists were prepared to defeat the British. He does so by mentioning the fact that the size of the Continental Army was twice the size of the British Army that was occupying Boston: “[T]here were perhaps 7,000 of the King’s men in Boston, or roughly half the number under Washington’s command.” (McCullough 25). Although the British troops were better trained and had more experience than the volunteers who were a part of the American army, the multitude in number was still a notable quality of Washington’s men that foreshadowed their ultimate victory.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the first things that Charles did once he had removed Parliament from the equation was to end the wars with Spain and France. This would stop him spending unnecessary money, and it would mean that he would not need Parliament to aid him in gaining any more, though he swiftly realised that he needed to find some new sources of income on his own. He went about discovering these using financial antiquarianism i.e. he looked back in history for ways to make money through taxes without creating new Acts of Parliament. One of the most famous of these was 1634 Ship Money. Ship Money was an ancient tax payable by those in coastal communities for their defence. Originally, it was only imposed on these coastal areas, though in 1636, Charles extended it to the whole country, with payment on an annual basis. Ship Money was a big earner – Charles achieved 90% of what he needed through each annual tax. However, opposition to these taxes was growing, and in 1637, and man by the name of John Hampden refused to pay. Hampden was taken to court and ultimately put into jail. This example of rebellion caused the opposition to strengthen even more, with the whole country being aware that it was Charles who imposed these rules. Another…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first line of the American troops were armed with rifles while the Britsih soilders were armed with muskets. The rifles fired with more accuracy and distance then the muskets. This allowed American soilders to pick off British officials before they were even in range to fire back. Taking out a lot of officials and even calvarymen really softened the blow of the British soilders This was a massive advantage for the American soilders.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of bosworth

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moreover Tudor had a very strong tactical setup going into the war, the vanguard, under the control of the Earl of oxford, was strengthened by the mercenaries of Philibert de Chandee, Sir Gilbert Talbot commanded the right wing and john savage on the left wing. However, the most important part of their strategy was the Stanley’s. The Stanley’s had been pushing towards the side of Richard due to the capture of Lord Strange, However during the time leading up to the battle negotiations and meetings between Tudor and the Stanley’s were building and Richard started to question whether he could trust them. Tudor began to gain more and more support as he travelled through wales and the key sign of allegiance to Tudor was when the Stanley family advised the bailiffs of Shrewsbury to open the town gates to let them in. So, the Stanley’s did not actively fight at the beginning of the battle but their betrayal soon became apparent when they attacked Richard near the conclusion of the battle. Other higher powers that Richard thought he would have the support of also backed out, for example Northumberland decided to not take part in the battle at all.…

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ability of Cutler’s Brigade to repel multiple attacks to the northwest of Gettysburg on the first day of battle was instrumental in the Union Army’s success at Gettysburg. Because Cutler’s Brigade was able to stop the enemy from flanking the Division line, the rest of the Army of the Potomac was able to move into position around Gettysburg. This emplacement of the rest of the Union Army around Gettysburg was vital to its success in the Gettysburg campaign; its success in the Gettysburg campaign was vital to the Union victory in the Civil War.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This capture gave the British’s plan to isolate New England the firm start it needed and kept them on plan, though ultimately, the plan turned into a British surrender.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The patriots defeated the British in Princeton, Bennington, Saratoga, Oriskany, Ft. Stanwix, Concord, Valley Forge, Trenton, and Yorktown. The Winter at Valley Forge was a lose for the patriots, over 2,000 men died that winter, and many gave up and went back home to their families. These victories have caused loses in large numbers and bigger hopes and dreams of our Patriotic forces. There were some patriot loses: Philadelphia, Brandywine, Germantown, New York City, and Ft. Ticonderoga. The victory in Yorktown was our last but one of our greatest victories this whole revolution. The 17,000 American and French troops that were sent into the battlefield made the British General Cornwallis surrender his troops and himself in October 19,1781. It…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many soldiers lost their lives, including General Braddock. Although the odds that England would win the war were very slim, they ended up winning because they captured French forts Quebec and…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It could be argued that because the colonists did have the help of France, and that Britain was in a poor economic state. For one, Britain forced its soldiers to fight or sign up, and then trained them to follow every command. This meant that Britain had complete control over their soldiers. This also meant that they had more soldiers to fight with. More soldiers that are more skilled is, based on common sense, almost a guaranteed win. The final reason why it was improbable for the British to lose was that they had more supplies than the colonists. More supplies would mean a higher moral, and not as famished soldiers. These are a few of the reasons why Britain should have won, but there are some good reasons why they…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evident in many ways, England wasn’t as motivated as the North was during their war because unlike the North, the loss of the colonies wouldn’t have had as big of an impact as it would have if the war had taken place on the same continent. Majority of British soldiers were only fighting because they were paid to, not because they felt a burning desire for change like the North did. The North was also a lot closer than England was to the battle, making it easier for reinforcements or supplies to quickly reach the front grounds, where as England had to wait for supplies to not only cross the ocean but then be transported to where they were stationed; along with that it took a lot less time to receive news and information about the war than it would have for the…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each European country had developed or was in the process of developing large standing armies. These armies were well disciplined and obeyed orders. An army would face his adversary across the field and progressively march towards them, shoulder to shoulder, in tight formation. When in range the soldiers in the first row would drop to one knee, present arms, and fire in unison on command. Then the soldiers would reload while the opposing force fired upon them. The point was not to kill all of the soldiers in the opposing force but to thin their numbers so it would be easier to charge in with bayonets and succeed. Discipline was crucial to victory because a disorganized army could not stand against a bayonet charge. This is called linear tactics due to the fact that the armies lined up and marched in straight…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Colonist had very leaderful leaders. The British leaders decided to have a plan where they would seize the Hudson River and cut off New England from the rest of the colonies. They would do this with a three-pronged attack. This strategy did not work because the leaders did not take into consideration that there will be battles along the way and supplies will be lost along with soldiers. The American leaders knew to take battles into consideration so they developed their plan around battles. They would retreat from battles so they can work their way up the appalachian Mountains to attack down hill. This was excellent leadership at work. Their excellent leadership definitely won the war for the Colonists.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriots won the Battle of Saratoga. The patriots went north to the village of Saratoga with 5,000 surviving troops. On October 13, about 20,00 patriots surrounded the British and four days later Great Britain was forced to agree with the…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1629 Chares the 1st suspended parliament and decided to rule as an absolute monarchy. However, he soon began to run out of money and begged for parliament to levy taxes once again. Kind Charles began to irritate parliament by suspending them again twice in one year. This caused the outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642. It was Cavaliers vs. Roundheads. Oliver Cromwell was the leader of the Roundheads and defeated the kings forces in 1649. The significance of this war was for parliament to not levy the taxes the Charles demanded. Parliament…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays