Quid Pro Quo Harassment Essay

Quid Pro Quo harassment occurs in the workplace when a manager or other authority figure offers or merely hints that he or she will give the employee something (a raise or promotion) in return for that employee’s satisfaction of a sexual demand. (Reuters, 2017). In this case, Mary is the victim of unwelcome sexual advances and must result in the tangible employment action. “This consists of a significant change in employment status; hiring, firing, failing to promote, reassignment, or a significant change in benefits”. (10.12 Civil Rights- Title VII- “Tangible Employment Action”). The type of hostile environment that Mary is experiencing is the remarks made by Bob and it is negatively affecting her job, he is making it a very offensive work environment for her. A hostile work environment harassment has nothing to do with the superiors actions or tangible employment actions.
Bob is a supervisor and he has enough authority to cause this action upon Mary. As an HR manager, he/she must ensure that both Bob the respondent and Mary the complainant are aware of the seriousness of the
of any harassment? Her and Bob were in a relationship at one time and because since they have broken it off Mary has been treated differently at work with poor performance evaluations by Bob. This is a red flag and Mary should be grated by the EEOC as a victim of tangible employment action. HR should notify Bob that he is breaking policy by harassing Mary and he should be fired, and the poor performance evaluations on Mary should be removed off of her