Preview

qwertttyutrey

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
qwertttyutrey
Timed-Write

In Act III scene ii of Julius Caesar, Antony delivers his famous funeral speech to the citizens of Rome. In his speech he utilizes ethos, logos, and pathos to sway the Plebeians against Marcus Brutus’s speech vilifying Caesar, moments before. Using the Short Analytic Essay format (Intro with Thesis, Body Paragraph, Conclusion) analyze one of these persuasive techniques utilized by Antony and explain how and why the information was included into Antony’s memorable address; what effect it had on the hostile crowd. Be sure to use specifics and analysis, rather than summary.

Timed-Write

In Act III scene ii of Julius Caesar, Antony delivers his famous funeral speech to the citizens of Rome. In his speech he utilizes ethos, logos, and pathos to sway the Plebeians against Marcus Brutus’s speech vilifying Caesar, moments before. Using the Short Analytic Essay format (Intro with Thesis, Body Paragraph, Conclusion) analyze one of these persuasive techniques utilized by Antony and explain how and why the information was included into Antony’s memorable address; what effect it had on the hostile crowd. Be sure to use specifics and analysis, rather than summary.

Timed-Write

In Act III scene ii of Julius Caesar, Antony delivers his famous funeral speech to the citizens of Rome. In his speech he utilizes ethos, logos, and pathos to sway the Plebeians against Marcus Brutus’s speech vilifying Caesar, moments before. Using the Short Analytic Essay format (Intro with Thesis, Body Paragraph, Conclusion) analyze one of these persuasive techniques utilized by Antony and explain how and why the information was included into Antony’s memorable address; what effect it had on the hostile crowd. Be sure to use specifics and analysis, rather than summary.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    UHC Cbcm's Analysis

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Page

    Over the past 2 -3 months Kelly has repeatedly been recognized by provider's during my face-to-face visits, they have described her as an exceptional advocate for our members and valued collaborator to our providers. One-on-one provider visits are primarily led by the providers to address the topics they feel would be most helpful for them, which almost always leads to requests for a specific guided training or claim resolutions; so it was especially rare and inspiring to have several of them voluntarily make it a point to identify and praise one of our UHC CBCM's. It was encouraging to hear their perspective on how dedicated Kelly is to her members, and how reliable they find her to be in working with them to address any obsticles they may…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast the ways in which the passage below attempts top discredit Anthony with the ways this is done in the speech attributed to Octavian die ( in reading 1.1 of book 1. Chapter 1.)…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast the ways in which the passage below attempts to discredit Anthony with the ways this is done in the speech attributed to Octavian by cassias die…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Struggles

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The passage (http://www.forumromanum.org/history/morey22.html) is from William C. Morey’s history text Outlines of Roman History. The outline examines the rise and fall of Antony and Octavius following Julius Caesar’s death. Review this information as well as your notes from class carefully. Then write an essay in which you analyze the power struggle in Rome.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antony understood the audience very well and knew they would consider any other viewpoint on any topic. He realized that using his emotions would be the most beneficial way to persuade. He was able to use ethos by stating how Caesar was not too ambitious to have his life taken away from him (III,ii,94-99). Antony used pathos by having a visual, emotional impact on the people. He lifted up his cloak, showing the wounds, and telling where each conspirator had the power and the evil motivation to kill this worthy man…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar’s Mark Antony prevails as the master of persuasion through language. In a eulogy speech for the recently deceased Caesar, he expertly employs repetition, reverse psychology, and flattery to manipulate the minds and hearts of his audience.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    [Exordium] Imagine your most noble friends turned out to be your murderers. {Subject}(3) Miserably, Julius Caesar experienced this in his final hours before his death. [Background]Caesar’s death took place on March 15, 44 BC in the Senate House, Rome. [Additional details] [A] Innocent of the knowledge of the plot, Caesar was with the other senators, all who had turned against him, when the famous historically known deed was done. [B] Brutus, one of Caesars best friends and trusted senator, was one of the leaders of the plot against Caesar's life. [C](4) Surprising, Caesar thought until the time of his death, that he was surrounded by his friends, although he was accompanied by his enemies. [Enumerations] This essay has three topics, which…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society, we often look to those in authority for guidance or clarification in times of darkness and distress. In these situations, we look to the most righteous and trustworthy of them all to be our candles in the darkness. Julius Caesar was murdered because a collection of conspirators assumed that he may in the future abuse his power. The conspirators were Cassius, Metellus, Ligarius, Cinna, Casca, Trebonius, and Brutus, Caesar's close friend. People who are used to being public speakers, such as public leaders are able to sway their audience in any direction they want with the assistance of logos, pathos, ethos. Antony and Brutus were equally honorable and well-respected, but after comparing the two funeral speeches , there’s no debate that Antony had the most effective speech because his excellent range of logos, ethos, and pathos.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethos Pathos And Logos

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Purpose and Overview: Thus far in the semester we have discussed the Rhetorical Appeals (Ethos, Pathos, and Logos) and writing as a means of entering a conversation. The purpose of this essay is for you to exercise the skills you have learned thus far of identifying the rhetorical appeals and how two authors use them in two selected essays. Essentially, I am asking you complete a rhetorical analysis of two authors’ essays and compare and contrast them to determine which of the two is more effective and why.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Initially, Antony uses Ethos to establish himself as a trusted and loyal figure to gain respect and trust of the plebeians. To gain the citizens’ attention, Antony begins Caesar’s funeral speech by reassuring them that he only “[came] to bury Caesar, not [to praise] him” (3.2.83). By only intending to bury Caesar, Antony convinces the audience to listen to his words because they are spoken with bitterness toward Caesar. With Antony in agreement with their newly instilled anger, the plebeians begin to trust Antony’s words even though his bitterness was not…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare presents the internal conflict that occurs in Brutus when he contemplates the assassination. He tries to rationalise his decisions through the balance of the language, weighing the arguments of the situation. “Th’ abuse of greatness...disjoins remorse from…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays