HS10306 YooJeong Min http://happilyeveraftermylife.wordpress.com/ Source: News.au.com
Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, has declared the groundbreaking news recently. With a device the laboratory is working on and a brain implant that will stir the visual cortex and optic nerve, blind people would be able to see the basic shapes; these eyes are called bionic eyes. "It will enable someone who is completely blind to see edges of tables and footpath in a coarse, dot-typed matrix, enough to give them mobility and connect them to their loved ones," said Professor Mark Armstrong, the director of Bluesky Design Group. (Pike) For sure, exponential development in technology is blurring the boundary of impossibility. In Radical Evolution, the readers can observe two diverging ideas with the side worshipping this development and trying to let people approach the sphere of the God with it -Heaven Scenario- and another side urging the demolition of humanity and pessimistic future -Hell Scenario-. I would like to identify more humanistic scenario, which is the Prevail Scenario.
People who have not read the book will fall into a flutter by the word Prevail
Scenario. Unlike two previous scenarios that predestinate the future, "uncertainty suffuses the Prevail Scenario." (Garreau 196) Humans, in the Prevail Scenario, become the main subject who will decide the future with changing technology. In this scenario, people will not measure the techonological development itself. Rather, the mass will observe the co-evolution in their society, made by their hands. The nation will adopt positive improvement in technology for themselves, and relinquish negative influences for themselves.
Source: http://authors.simonandschuster.com/James-Carse/313085
I confirm this scenario as it is very sincere with the future. It lets people ponder about their dazzling potential and prospects. James P. Carse, the emeritus