only animals that I know I can use for food.
only animals that I know I can use for food.
In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford is hard hearted and does not care about the animals that he pursues; however, when Rainsford is being hunted he realizes the fear of the prey, and his perspective shifts, therefore, he gains empathy for the quarry.…
“The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is a story about a hunter, Rainsford, who finds a deserted island, where he meets General Zaroff who too shares an interest in hunting. On this island, General Zaroff hunts humans that have had the misfortune to end up on his island. Although Zaroff lives in a very civilized home with electricity and fancy food, Zaroff himself is a very uncivilized being. In the story, General Zaroff is explaining to Rainsford why he hunts humans. “...If I wish to hunt, why should I not? I hunt the scum of the earth...a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than the score of them.” (Connell, 64). Zaroff is saying that it is okay to hunt people if you are better than them. He does not value human life. This makes…
Rainsford is uncompassionate, this is seen when he’s talking to Whitney. “‘Don’t talk rot, Whitney.’ Said Rainsford. ‘You’re a big game hunter not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels’ ”.This shows how he’s uncompassionate because he takes no account for how the animals feel. It’s all about the sport. He is also a very proud person. This is seen when he boasts about his sport, hunting, and how it’s the best sport in the word. Rainsford is also courageous. This is seen when he is not deterred by the superstition that surrounds Ship Trap Island. He could also be perceived as strong when he swims to the shore after he is thrown off the boat. This is…
In the story “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford a world-renowned big-game hunter gets hunted by general Zaroff. Rainsford was traveling to the amazon on a yacht but falls off and stranded on a island where general Zaroff finds him takes him home. At the end Zaroff dies and Rainsford lives but there is still one unanswered question?Will Rainsford ever hunt again?Rainsford would probably hunt again because he knows what it's like to be hunted,his whole life he has hunted why would he stop, and Rainsford will think it's better to hunt humans than animals. Basically Rainsford has hunted his whole life if he he’d stopped that would be just a waste of his life. So because he has to hunt animals to eat to survive in the wild or even be cannibalism…
For example, Whitney says, “I’d rather think they fear one thing- Fear, the fear of pain, and the fear of death.” At this time in the story Whitney is explaining to Rainsford how animals feel when they are being hunted. Rainsford doubts him and insists animals do not have feelings. He is being very naive about fear and does not think hunting is wrong. His view on fear and hunting…
Rainsford will not take over General Zaroff’s game of hunting other humans. For instance, when General Zaroff asks Rainsford to go hunting, he says, “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.”(25) Rainsford classifies himself as someone who hunts animals, but not humans. He disapproves of General Zaroff’s game and most likely still does. In addition, while Rainsford is being hunted, he thinks, “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.”(31) Rainsford is truly afraid at this point just like other humans are when they are being hunted. He has had the horrifying experience and probably doesn’t want anyone to feel this fear. As a result, Rainsford is a gentleman and animal…
In The Most Dangerous Game, Connell describes Rainsford, the protagonist, as a renowned hunter. Connell uses the opening conversation between Rainsford and Whitney, Rainsford’s companion on the yacht, to enlighten the reader to Rainsford’s attitude of indifference concerning the prey that he hunts. As fate would have it, Rainsford is marooned on an island where he meets another hunter, General Zaroff. As the story progresses, Rainsford begins to see the façade of civility disappear and the real nature of the General come to surface. The General explains how hunting man is the logical progression of their art and that they are actually kindred souls. Rainsford is appalled by the comparison of their two natures and clings to the moral high ground. That is until the General forces Rainsford to now become the prey. Rainsford, now the prey, calls upon not only his vast knowledge and experience of the hunt but also his primeval instinct of survival. Connell takes the reader through many twists and turns giving hope for Rainsford around each corner only to take it away. Due to the cunningness and resourcefulness of Rainsford, the General is given literally the best hunt of his life. In the end, Rainsford outsmarts the General…
Sanger Rainsford is the type of person that benefits a society or environment. Rainsford hunts most animals and this helps maintain the number of species in one location. A previously read article stated, “Without the hunter, many breeds of animals would become overpopulated and eventually die off from starvation due to the excessive numbers and lower food percentage per herd.” The difference between Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff is the type of hunting they each practice. Sanger Rainsford is more justified than General Zaroff because Rainsford hunts animals which help the number of breeds remain the same instead of killing humans with a life, feelings, and a family. Rainsford is justified and was not thought bad of because of what he hunted, and the reason behind…
As the population of whitetail deer continues to rise in Kentucky, chances of taking one increase as well. In “Kentucky Deer Season 2013: Hunting Forecast” Darren Warner of OutdoorLife.com states that “The current statewide population estimate for Kentucky's deer herd is about 900,000 animals.” Due to the abundancy of deer, during the apocalypse they will be a great source of food for you and your group. However, after the kill, most hunters do not know what to do next, and those who do often do not take the most ethical route to processing a deer. Compocalypse students need to know how to efficiently process a deer because venison will provide large, protein packed meal during the apocalypse and can also provide skin to make clothing out of,…
In the story, The Most Dangerous Game, Richard Connell shows that Rainsford is regretful, anxious, and fearful. First, it is shown that Rainsford is regretful due to the fact that General Zaroff gives him the option to play the most dangerous game or be whipped by Ivan, to which Rainsford chooses to play the game. Rainsford tries again and again to fall asleep at night, but he is helpless with his choice replaying in his mind. “Rainsford could not quiet his brain with the opiate of sleep.” Second, Rainsford’s anxiousness is shown because he is uneasy about the thought of not being able to see the day after next. Although he is a marvelous hunter, there is a possibility that he may be no match to someone who is undefeated in assassinating humans.…
This is a grisly joke. ""Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting.""Hunting? General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder"" (Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game). Before Rainsford was swept away on the island, he would never have taken another person's life, as looking at this action as murder, not just a game.…
Concerning his conversation with Whitney at the beginning, his opinion of hunting could have easily changed after being in the position of the jaguar; he understands them now and pities them. He wouldn’t want to hunt humans now that he’s been in their place. Also to note the fact that Rainsford says multiple times things like “...What you speak of is murder.”, “-Did not make me condone cold-blooded murder.”, and “... I’m a hunter, not a murderer.” This shows that in Rainsford’s eyes, he strongly thinks that what Zaroff is doing is morally wrong. If he so strongly feels that hunting humans is murder, then why would he become a murderer himself? Another point, many people see Rainsford as being comfortable in Zaroff’s bed as him taking on Zaroff’s power, but have you ever considered the fact that it could just be Rainsford finally feeling safe? Now that Zaroff is gone, he knows for sure that he can sleep soundly and not be killed.…
Hunters should hunt for food, not just for the thrill of it. The number of animals in the world has declined by 95 percent in the last century. Some hunters kill just for fun. Hunting for fun is different than hunting for food. If a person is doing it for fun it is just killing an animal that did not do anything to them. Some animals that are extinct are tigers, rare leopards, deer, and a lot of other animals . Hunting just for trophies is wrong. when you hunt you should hunt for food, not just for the trophies or money. There needs to be more protection of endangered animals in Africa from foreign hunters.…
If one is a hunter, one goes through life wandering through several other lives or careers with no real sense of understanding or purpose other than his or her emotions, and through their personal experiences, live many lives. A sage, however, lives many lives in a myth, by literally entering the thoughts of another (or in reality) by studying the myths of a religion or people. A historian of religion, in order to best understand the intricacies of a religion and the people who follow that religion, must be able to do both. A hunting sage is a person who can experience many lives through personal experience, and through the entering of other people’s thoughts. To do this effectively one must be able to use their mind and heart in order to both…
Hank Shaw’s “On Killing” is an article showing the readers that there is more than meets the eye on the sport of hunting. His style, use of first-person, and emotion really capture the reader’s attention and makes it easy to build a convincing connection through text. This relationship allows the reader to learn more about him as an individual versus just an author. Shaw’s title and opening line insinuates the piece might be about death and killings of some sort. A sad topic, yet he finds a way to turn this around into something beautiful and worth reading.…