Preview

Refuting Arguments In Aristotle's Debate

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Refuting Arguments In Aristotle's Debate
Another factor that Aristotle mentioned is being knowledgeable about both sides of the topic. A good persuasive speaker would think about the refuting arguments that might arise in a speech and would be look that the topic from the other point of view so they would be able dispute the speaker’s side. Aristotle talks about how we should not tell people their beliefs are wrong but "We may see clearly what the facts are, and that, if another man argues unfairly, we on our own part may be able to confute him” (Aristotle 23). By doing this the audience will see how well rounded the speaker is on the subject and thus establishing credibility. In terms of personal character if the speaker takes the time to understand the other point of view he will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Almost 2500 years ago Aristotle was born, he was born into a wealthy educated family in Greece. He was a student of the famed Plato (another Greek philosopher) and went on to make many great discoveries and theories. One of Aristotle's greatest teachings was in the art of rhetoric. Aristotle said that to be persuasive in ones arguments that one must establish credibility (ethos) use logical argument (logos), and appeal to the audience on an emotional level (pathos). Twenty two hundred years later a young statesman named Patrick Henry would exemplify these three techniques to near perfect use, in his speech to the Virginia House of Burgesses.…

    • 856 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many different tactics that a rhetorician can use for the effectiveness of persuasion. Gorgias declares that trickery is a bad use of rhetoric. Rhetoricians should not use trickery in order to convince someone of something. Instead, they should speak the truth and have evidence for their facts. He states "those who have persuaded and do persuade anyone about anything are shapers of lying discourse". Also, rhetoricians should describe the argument at hand to make sure that both sides understand what exactly the argument is about. However, it might be difficult if one beliefs if they are peaking the truth yet they are speaking fallacies.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive approaches are different depending on the relationship you have with your audience. For a challenging person I would have to use a presentation of facts. I would have to prove my point by using logos and supporting it with facts, studies, reports and credible resources that support the information presented. A challenging person will already have their perception of a situation for subject and to persuade them I would need proof not just my own opinion.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goal of argumentative writing is to persuade an audience. Academic writers use rhetoric (language designed to have a persuasive effect) to persuade or convince readers that their position on an issue or topic is the correct one. In his study of rhetoric, the Greek philosopher Aristotle designed a model called a “rhetorical triangle.” This model describes every act of speech or text as being composed of three parts: the subject, the speaker, and the audience. According to Aristotle, all three points on this triangle must be taken into consideration in order to produce a successful persuasive…

    • 8284 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When writing academic papers, try to set your other interests & behaviors aside & write as a scholar. This will make you a credible writer. Ethos is very important when presenting an argument. To persuade readers to agree with you, writing must be credible. How can you appeal to your audience? You must find a way to reach your audience & impress them w/your ability to use shared values & culture to persuade the reader. Aristotle used the term pathos to describe the humanistic appeal to emotion & values of your audience.…

    • 932 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different authors use different techniques to persuade. The three main ways of persuading are through: pathos, which uses emotions, ethos, which proves their credibility, and logos, which implies the general message. Shakespeare, Lance Armstrong, and Amanda Ripley have all written articles arguing their opinion on the value of life. Of the three articles Lance Armstrong best persuades the audience with his argument that life is very valuable and that you could better your life from something negative, through his exceptional use of both logos and pathos.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crucial Conversations: Tools for talking when the stakes are high Patterson, Grenny, McMillan and Switzler The first version of this book was actually published in 2002, the Authors traveled the world and addressed hundreds of thousands of people, after a period of 25 years and more research, the authors revised their book with their new findings and published the second edition. They studied successful communicators and then concluded that what typically set those communicators apart from the rest was their ability to deal with crucial conversations. They found that this specific group of people possessed a skill-set that is easy to learn and in return allowed them to face any situation with nearly anybody,no matter power, position, or authority.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In your first paragraph, you talk about people’s ability to influence others into decisions that may or may not benefit them but you do not explain what rhetoric is. Ethos (appeals based on the character of the speaker), logos (appeals to logic and reasoning), or pathos (appeals to emotion) (Austin 177). The explanation would give a reason why they might they might be persuaded.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The words chosen and the tone employed are important. Is the writer using repetition to make his point more memorable? Is the tone sarcastic, scholarly, or friendly? Are comparisons being made? These details are important to understanding the arguments being made and the points the author is making.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To persuade your audience you must first help your audience recognize the quality of your ideas, using techniques that will work is the best way to do this.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Argument Analysis

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To Plato, there existed fundamental patterns in the universe, Forms so pure and unblemished that most people will never know them, even as they act as existence in its purest form. All around us, everyday objects toe the line between these pure existences, never committing to one yet never abandoning one. To those few who could gaze upon these paradigms and look beyond the pale imitations in every object, Plato gave the name Philosophers. In the Book V of the Republic, Plato’s definition of philosophers is essential in illustrating the closest possible parallel in real life to his model city by taking account of the occasion of the argument and acting as the foundation of his argument.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that there are a lot of things together that make a good speech. I think that the base of a good speech starts with using all ethos pathos and logos, i think that a good speech leads with one of these but still uses the others almost as much. I think out of ethos pathos and logos is logos because i think that people would rather believe something they can know to be true instead of someone with authority or something that emotionally speaks to them. Also it's almost always most rational to go with the facts for example if someone says “ i am a doctor and i think that glass is toxic to human skin” and someone else says “ actually i did various studies on glass by having multiple people touch it and it had no effect” you would most likely believe the second person.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric

    • 848 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “We can all benefit from learning to influence, persuade, negotiate, train and sell to others in a variety of contexts from direct selling to clients to coaching, team building, appraising, motivating and leading” (Atkinson, 2012). Rhetoric is a tool that we can use throughout our careers and in our daily lives. I will be defining rhetoric, listing the benefits of persuasion, the five stages of the persuasion process, and how I feel persuasion will help me in my profession.…

    • 848 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    convincing by which he is able to get his message understood at all levels of an…

    • 612 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    You persuade by demonstrating the workability of your superior knowledge through your actions and allow others to make up their minds to relate with you or not. Every individual is different and independent of others. Level of understanding and receptiveness of new knowledge also differs from individual to individual. People see things from different perspectives depending on various factors ranging from background, education, exposure, experience, faith, etc. Therefore never attempt to force your life style on others. This might be counterproductive and…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays