The first flaw is that while Descartes supposedly doubts all things, even his own existence in the beginning, however he does not doubt the existence of God and claims his idea has no outside cause except for God. Another flaw in his reasoning is that he offers no reason for the mind to be attached to the body or how the mind and body communicate. Another problem for which Descartes has no real answer is why the mind perceives pain rather than observing it. With the flaws of Cartesian Dualism, I do not find the position to be entirely plausible. If there was a more definitive and explainable link between the mind and immaterial body given by the Cartesian Dualism, then it may have been more
The first flaw is that while Descartes supposedly doubts all things, even his own existence in the beginning, however he does not doubt the existence of God and claims his idea has no outside cause except for God. Another flaw in his reasoning is that he offers no reason for the mind to be attached to the body or how the mind and body communicate. Another problem for which Descartes has no real answer is why the mind perceives pain rather than observing it. With the flaws of Cartesian Dualism, I do not find the position to be entirely plausible. If there was a more definitive and explainable link between the mind and immaterial body given by the Cartesian Dualism, then it may have been more